Tokyo Electric Power Co. in early December made public an interim report by a study panel that it had appointed itself on the disaster that occurred at its Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant following the March 11 earthquake and tsunami. The report details the unfolding of the disaster from the loss of all electric power sources to the meltdowns of the cores of three reactors.
Unfortunately, the report is loaded with self-justifying excuses. It is clear that the investigation of the disaster cannot be left solely to Tepco. Other entities, including the government third-party examination panel, the Diet examination panel and nongovernmental organizations, should carry out thorough investigations of their own and break any attempt by the nuclear power establishment to hide or distort information.
Tepco’s official worst-case tsunami scenario for the plant involved a wave with a maximum height of 5.7 meters. Although in 2008 the company had carried out an assessment that predicted the possibility of a tsunami with a maximum height of 10.2 meters striking the plant, Tepco did not take measures to prepare against such an event. The report states that Tepco did not take such measures because the 10.2-meter scenario was based on a “groundless hypothesis,” despite the fact that its own staff had made the assessment, and despite having been warned in the past by outside experts that a massive tsunami could strike the region.
Tepco also said the loss of all electric power sources was not attributable to its negligence. The report states that Tepco worked with the government to prepare against severe disasters and that in doing such a loss of power sources was not expected.
The report fails to fully record accounts by workers who were on the scene when the disaster struck. One wonders whether Tepco is sincerely trying to preserve accurate accounts of what happened at the plant to develop a true picture of the disaster.
A peculiar characteristic of the report is that Tepco blames the tsunami for causing the nuclear crisis while adamantly taking the position that the earthquake itself did not damage reactor components that play a vital role in ensuring that reactors operate safely. But Tepco employees working inside the reactor buildings at the time the quake struck reported seeing what they believed to be damaged cooling pipes. In addition, some experts say evidence exists that suggests the reactors’ cooling systems had suffered damage before the tsunami struck.
To maximize the safety of Japan’s nuclear reactors, it is imperative that accident examination entities take an approach contrary to Tepco’s attitude of underrating or ignoring the March 11 earthquake’s effect on the reactors’ cooling systems and other vital components. Given that Japan is one of the most earthquake-prone countries in the world, this approach, not Tepco’s, is the only rational one to take.
In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.