The Diet debate on media-related legislation has stirred controversy over freedom of expression. The main concern, expressed by legislators from both the ruling and opposition camps, is that it would put unreasonable restraints on the media. Even former members of the government panels that drafted the legislation are calling for changes to the bills.
At issue are two government bills designed to protect personal data and human rights. Originally they were not meant to regulate the media, as a former panelist points out. A thorough review is needed of the proposed clauses that could unduly restrict or prevent reporting activity. Preferably the government should withdraw the bills and draft new ones.
The personal data bill is seriously flawed in three ways: First, it requires those handling personal data to (1) restrict its uses, (2) acquire it properly, (3) use it accurately, (4) keep it safe and (5) make it transparent. The problem is that these ground rules, though not legally binding, could still make media organizations legally liable for noncompliance.