U.S. military official says time running out to begin upgrading nation’s nuclear forces


The top U.S. nuclear war-fighting commander says time is running short to begin modernizing the decades-old U.S. nuclear forces.

Navy Adm. Cecil Haney and other Pentagon leaders contend the force is still in fighting shape — “safe, reliable and effective” is the official mantra. But they also argue the time has come to begin modernizing the force or risk eroding its credibility as a deterrent to attack by others.

The debate in Congress over spending hundreds of billions of dollars to build and field a new generation of nuclear-capable bombers, submarines and land-based missiles is just beginning.

Critics say full-scale modernization is neither affordable nor necessary.

The debate is influenced not only by the perceived need to fully replace aging weapons but also by worries about North Korea’s nuclear ambitions and concern over what Defense Secretary Ash Carter calls Russia’s “nuclear saber-rattling.”

Robert Work, the deputy secretary of defense, said the Pentagon will need an estimated $18 billion a year between 2021 and 2035 to modernize the three “legs” of the U.S. nuclear triad — weapons capable of being launched from land, sea and air.

“We need to replace these,” Work said. “We can’t delay this anymore.”

The enormous sums needed are at risk of getting squeezed by high-priority requirements for non-nuclear, conventional weapons. And Work’s numbers do not include the billions that will be needed to modernize the nuclear warheads on the business end of missiles and bombs.

“Modernization now is not an option” — it must happen, Haney, the commander of U.S. Strategic Command, said in an interview Friday, just hours after watching a test launch of an unarmed Minuteman 3 intercontinental ballistic missile, or ICBM. The Minuteman, which has been on constant 24-hour alert since 1970, has long surpassed its 10-year life expectancy.

Haney said the U.S. stockpile of nuclear warheads is the oldest it has ever been. As head of Strategic Command he is the military’s top nuclear war-fighter.

“We have to realize we can’t extend things forever,” Haney said, noting that the navy is planning to replace its aging Ohio-class ballistic nuclear missile submarines, while the air force intends to build a new nuclear-capable bomber to replace the B-52.

Work said that although the Pentagon is closely monitoring Russia’s nuclear modernization, which includes development of new versions of its ICBMs, those moves are not driving U.S. decisions about how quickly and broadly it should modernize its nuclear forces.

Some private analysts, however, see the U.S. and Russia entering a new arms competition.

“It’s disturbing how quickly both the United States and Russia are sliding back toward the Cold War, both rhetorically and operationally,” said Stephen Schwartz, an independent nuclear policy analyst and author.

“Worse still, both the United States and Russia are now using each other’s nuclear programs and military activities to justify and rationalize their own,” he added.

Haney and Work both were present Thursday night for the Minuteman 3 test launch, which was the second such test of the year. Work said Friday that the test was successful, with the missile’s payload landing within a targeted area of water near Kwajalein Atoll in the South Pacific. He said it was the eighth consecutive successful Minuteman test launch, which would mean the last unsuccessful test was in December 2013, according to a chronology provided by the air force.

  • Lee Larsen

    We just have to spend 252 billion dollars to more effectively and efficiently destroy planet Earth and it’s inhabitants in case of nuclear war to protect our way of life. And somehow in the minds of the leaders of the military weapons complex, this makes perfect sense. Uh, just drop me off at that next planet. No signs of intelligent life on this one.

    • Sergei Popkov

      Did you mean ” to protect our Agenda we pushing around forcefully on every country on this earth “

  • Mark Jamison

    Well that explains it. Change the triad. Times up!

  • Barry Nicholson

    The current F22 /F35 program is said to have been able to give everyone in America below the poverty line…..500 thousands dollars…but wait it still will not outperform the 20 yr old F16…who are these aliens in DC…

    • Bill Merritt

      Incorrect. The F-35A already out manuevers the F-16. You forget the F-35B is a quantum leap better performer than the AV-8B Harrier, and the F-35C is far superior to the F-18 Super Hornet. The F-35 program is an unqualified success for the Navy & Marine Corps.