Stigmatized workers quitting Tepco in droves



Stigma, pay cuts and risk of radiation exposure are among the reasons why 3,000 employees have left Tepco, the utility at the center of the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster. Now there’s an additional factor: better paying jobs in the feel-good solar energy industry.

Engineers and other employees at Tokyo Electric Power Co. were once typical of the nation’s corporate culture that is famous for prizing loyalty to a single company and lifetime employment with it. But the March 2011 tsunami that swamped the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant, sending three reactors into meltdown, changed that.

Tepco was widely criticized for being inadequately prepared for tsunami despite Japan’s long history of being hit by giant waves and for its confused response to the disaster. The public turned hostile toward the nuclear industry and Tepco, or “Tohden” in Japanese, became a dirty word.

Only 134 people quit Tepco the year before the disaster. The departures ballooned to 465 in 2011, another 712 in 2012 and 488 last year. Seventy percent of those leaving were younger than 40. When the company offered voluntary retirement for the first time earlier this year, some 1,151 workers applied for the 1,000 available redundancy packages.

The exodus, which has reduced staff to about 35,700 people, adds to the challenges of the ongoing work at Fukushima to keep the meltdowns under control, remove the fuel cores and safely decommission the reactors, which is expected to take decades.

The factors pushing workers out have piled up. The financial strain of the disaster has led to brutal salary cuts while ongoing problems at Fukushima No. 1, such as substantial leaks of irradiated water, have reinforced the image of a bumbling and irresponsible organization.

“No one is going to want to work there, if they can help it,” said Akihiro Yoshikawa, who quit Tepco in 2012.

After leaving he started a campaign called “Appreciate Fukushima Workers,” trying to counter what he calls the “giant social stigma” attached to working at Fukushima No. 1.

Many of the workers, as residents of the area, also lost their homes to no-go zones, adding to personal hardships.

The Fukushima stigma is such that some employees hide the fact they work at the plant. They even worry they will be turned away at restaurants or that their children will be bullied at school after a government report documented dozens of cases of discrimination.

While Tepco is out of favor with the public, the skills and experience of its employees that span the gamut of engineers, project managers, maintenance workers and construction and financial professionals, are not.

Energy industry experience is in particular demand as the development of solar and other green energy businesses is pushed along by generous government subsidies.

Currently the government pays solar plants ¥32 per kilowatt hour of energy. The so-called tariff for solar power varies by states and cities in the U.S., but they are generally lower than Japan’s version. The rate in Germany is about half that in Japan.

Sean Travers, Japan president of EarthStream, a London-based recruitment company that specializes in energy jobs, has been scrambling to woo Tepco employees as foreign companies do more clean energy business in Japan.

“Tepco employees are very well trained and have excellent knowledge of how the Japanese energy sector works, making them very attractive,” he said.

Two top executives at U.S. solar companies doing business in Japan, First Solar director Karl Brutsaert and SunPower Japan director Takashi Sugihara, said they have interviewed former Tepco employees for possible posts.

Besides their experience, knowledge of how the utility industry works and their contacts, with both private industry and government bureaucracy, are prized assets.

“It’s about the human network and the Tepco employees have all the contacts,” said Travers, who says he has recruited about 20 people from the utility and is hoping to get more.

Since September 2012, all Tepco managers have had their salaries slashed by 30 percent, while workers in nonmanagement positions had their pay reduced 20 percent.

But last year, Tepco doled out ¥100,000 bonuses to 5,000 managers as an incentive to stay on.

  • Rex

    Just letting you know that the description on the home page states “3,000 employees have Tepco…”. Looks like you forgot “left”. Love the articles, keep up the good work!

  • Earl Kinmonth

    I did a Google search on stigma and {Japan, Italy, and Britain}. “Stigma” seems far more common in Japan than Italy or Britain (and probably other countries as well). Is this becaue the Japanese have longer intestines? Or, is it because journalists writing in English about Japan have a compulsive disorder that leads to repeated usage of cliches?

    • warota

      So this is the problem you have with the article? The wording?

      I’m sure the affected workers the article talks about appreciate your dedication to the correct usage of the English language. Most people will understand when it talks about “stigma” it means “social stigma”.

      But I guess if you can’t parse anything outside of what you feel is correct I suppose it would be hard for people like you to understand. Thanks for pointing it out.

      • Earl Kinmonth

        Yes, the wording. Japanese language articles stress economic factors – both pay cuts and incentives to accept voluntary redundancy. A better of test of “stigma” will be if graduates of elite universities shun Tepco now that it is hiring again in a big way. If you check the Japan Times archive, you will see that previously the JT has reported that Tepco was under government pressure to reduce employment and was offering incentives for people to accept voluntary redundancy. Even this article makes a good case that many have quit for economic reasons, not because of any real or imagined “stigma.” The article says that people who quit find that their former connection to Tepco makes them valuable. In other words the “Tepco stigma” can be monetized, perhaps a first in the world of “stigma.”

      • warota

        Alright so how do you explain Akihiro Yoshikawa mentioned in the article who quit Tepco in 2012 and started a campaign in response to the “giant social stigma” surrounding Tepco workers? Is he and others like him an outlier then?

      • Earl Kinmonth

        Quite possibly. In 2012, the last year for which a complete figure is given, Tepco had 48,757 full time employees. I would imagine that a sample of one is inadequate to gauge the feelings of the other 48,756. Further, I looked at some of the stuff written by 吉川彰浩. I did not see him using any of the standard translations of “stigma.” He does use “bashing” (in katakana) and 懸念 (be apprehensive) to describe public attitudes toward Fukushima workers, but as far as I can tell, he is not talking about Tepco workers. He is talking about attitudes toward the casual laborers who are employed by subcontractors, some quite probably underworld controlled, who do the dirty and dangerous work at Fukushima. They may well be stigmatized but they are NOT Tepco employees. Casual laborers including the homeless who have been recruited for dirty and dangerous work at Fukushima would probably not be highly regarded in any country at anytime. But, unless I am missing something completely, 吉川彰浩 is a former Tepco employee who is an activist concerned with casual laborers who are not now and never were Tepco employees. If I am wrong, please point me to the appropriate Japanese language sources.