U.S. President Joe Biden’s avowed intention to close the Guantanamo detention camp offers hope to end an embarrassing episode in the most recent history of the United States. The abuses committed at Guantanamo have been criticized by many countries around the globe and condemned by all leading human rights organizations.
The Constitution Project, a Washington-based nonpartisan research and advocacy group, stated that “U.S. forces, in many instances, used interrogation techniques on detainees that constitute torture. American personnel conducted an even larger number of interrogations that involved ‘cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. Both categories of actions violate U.S. laws and international treaties. Such conduct was directly counter to values of the Constitution and our nation.”
Equally appalling has been the involvement of medical personnel who supervised the interrogation of detainees, as denounced by Open Society and the Institute of Medicine as a Profession (IMAP) to the point that the U.S. Department of Defense considered those health professionals “safety officers” rather than doctors. In its report “Deprivation and Despair: The Crisis of Medical Care at Guantanamo,” Physicians for Human Rights (USA) gives a detailed account of the abuses that detainees were subjected to in Guantanamo.
One argument for denying constitutional protections to Guantanamo prisoners rests on the fact that Guantanamo is in Cuba, off American soil. Respect for basic human dignity, however, is not limited by nationality or territory. And if the Bill of Rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution were not enough, international human rights law (customary and treaty-based,) extends such protection to Guantanamo detainees. Although the most glaring abuse of prisoners in Guantanamo has reportedly ceased, keeping this facility open perpetuates a situation of injustice, should serious ethical concerns not suffice.
There are some obvious practical hindrances to closing Guantanamo, including the need to ensure that some prisoners will no longer pose a threat and to relocate those that do, a challenge aggravated by the coronavirus pandemic.
A starting point to address these questions is to re-establish the State Department post of Guantanamo closure envoy. The post was created by former President Barack Obama but was eliminated by former President Donald Trump. The Pentagon should restart a thorough review of the remaining prisoners’ cases to determine who among them continues to pose a security threat and expedite those cases that don’t.
One of the toughest foreign policy challenges for the Biden administration is to continue its war on terrorism while continuing to adhere to international human rights standards.
In its report titled “USA: Right the Wrong” Amnesty International says, “After a period in which many pressing social, environmental and justice issues have been set back, the Biden administration’s plate will undoubtedly be full.
“But not as full as to be unable to prioritize and resource closure of the Guantanamo detention facility, to immediately begin to work for a lawful resolution of every single case, and to commit to a new and full respect by the USA for international human rights law.
“In the end, this is about even more than the 40 people still held at Guantanamo. It is not only about the detentions today, but also about crimes under international law of yesterday and the continuing lack of accountability and remedy for them. It is about the future too, of moving towards the 20th anniversary of 9/11 and beyond with the USA striving for real and enduring justice and with a commitment to being a genuine supporter of human rights.”
The conditions in which prisoners have been held at Guantanamo have been an indelible stain on the U.S. reputation throughout the world. Closing this infamous facility would signal a welcome change in U.S. national and international politics. The time to close Guantanamo is long overdue.
Cesar Chelala is an international public health consultant, and a co-winner of an Overseas Press Club of America award for the best article on human rights.
In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.