• Reuters


The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that almost $2 billion in frozen Iranian assets must be turned over to American families of people killed in the 1983 bombing of a U.S. Marine Corps barracks in Beirut and other attacks blamed on Iran.

The court’s 6-2 ruling dealt a setback to Iran’s central bank, finding that the U.S. Congress did not usurp the authority of American courts by passing a 2012 law stating that the frozen funds should go toward satisfying a $2.65 billion judgment won by the families against Iran in U.S. federal court in 2007.

Bank Markazi had challenged a 2014 ruling by the New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that the assets, bonds held in a Citibank trust account in New York, should be handed over to the more than 1,000 American plaintiffs.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs said the ruling resolved all the legal issues and they would now ask a federal judge to authorize distribution of money to the plaintiffs.

“We are extremely pleased with the Supreme Court’s decision, which will bring long-overdue relief to more than 1,000 victims of Iranian terrorism and their families, many of whom have waited decades for redress,” said Ted Olson, a lawyer for the victims.

Jeffrey Lamken, the Iranian bank’s attorney, declined comment.

The plaintiffs have waged a long legal battle seeking compensation for attacks they say Iran orchestrated. Congress inserted itself into the dispute by passing the law to help the plaintiffs obtain the Iranian funds.

The plaintiffs accused Iran of providing material support to Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed Shiite Islamist political and military group responsible for the 1983 truck bomb attack at the Marine compound in Beirut that killed 241 U.S. service members.

They also sought compensation related to other attacks, including the 1996 Khobar Towers truck bombing in Saudi Arabia that killed 19 U.S. service members.

The lead plaintiff is Deborah Peterson, whose brother, Marine Lance Cpl. James Knipple, died in the Beirut bombing.

The ruling, written by liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, said the U.S. Congress did not violate the separation of powers principle enshrined in the U.S. Constitution giving specific authority to the government’s executive, legislative and judicial branches.

Ginsburg said the 2012 law was “no threat to the independence of the judiciary” because it did not apply simply to one case, but rather “multiple civil actions” against Iran by numerous plaintiffs. The law simply set a new legal standard and left it to the courts to determine how that standard should be implemented, Ginsburg said.

As such, the law “does not transgress constraints placed on Congress and the president by the Constitution,” Ginsburg wrote.

She also noted that courts generally give Congress and the White House greater leeway in foreign affairs.

Chief Justice John Roberts, a conservative, criticized the ruling, saying he believes Congress was “commandeering the courts to make a political judgment look like a judicial one.” Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor joined his dissent.

The plaintiffs are due to receive varying amounts of compensation depending on the size of the judgments they obtained in court against Iran. It was unclear how soon the funds will be distributed.

The ruling came during a delicate period in U.S.-Iranian relations, following January’s implementation of a landmark accord reached last year by the United States and five other world powers to lift economic sanctions in exchange for Iran accepting limits on its nuclear program.

Democratic U.S. Sen. Bob Menendez of New Jersey, who authored the 2012 legislation in question, called the ruling “a long-awaited victory for justice” that ensures victims receive compensation.

Menendez said financial windfalls Iran’s government may receive due to the nuclear deal’s lifting of economic sanctions could now go toward paying U.S. victims of state-sponsored attacks.

“So long as Iran continues its support for terrorism, its regime will be held liable for its actions,” Menendez said.

Leading Republicans including House of Representatives Speaker Paul Ryan and presidential candidate Ted Cruz expressed support for the ruling.

The Obama administration, the U.S. Senate and a legal group representing House leaders all filed court papers backing the families.

The assets held in New York were part of the Iranian bank’s foreign currency reserves. They were traced to a Citibank account held by Luxemburg-based Clearstream Banking, which acted as a intermediary for Banca UBAE, an Italian bank of which Bank Markazi is a customer.

In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.