• Tokyo

  • SHARE

Professor Gavan McCormack’s Nov. 11 article, “Yet Another ‘Battle of Okinawa,’ ” is a rare and welcome retort to the vacuous platitudes one often reads in The Japan Times about the need to avoid disrupting Japan-U.S. security cooperation by being too sensitive about U.S. nuclear weapons — as if Hiroshima counts for nothing — and being inflexible about U.S. bases in Okinawa. Recent articles by two Japan Times regular contributors plus the Oct. 23 editorial (“A base Okinawans can live with”) suggested that democracy should take a back seat to relations between the United States and Japan.

McCormack clearly illustrates how the Guam Treaty, which forms the basis of the relocation issue, is colonial in nature and a violation of Japanese sovereignty. To that I might add that the U.S. bases in Japan have over the last four decades served as the launching platform for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese, Iraqis and Afghans — inconvenient truths that are swept under the rug by manipulation of security concerns. In truth, U.S. militarism worldwide promotes instability and justifies huge expenditures.

Unable to view this article?

This could be due to a conflict with your ad-blocking or security software.

Please add japantimes.co.jp and piano.io to your list of allowed sites.

If this does not resolve the issue or you are unable to add the domains to your allowlist, please see out this support page.

We humbly apologize for the inconvenience.

In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.

SUBSCRIBE NOW