Women who applied unsuccessfully to Tokyo Medical University intend to demand compensation from the school for manipulating entrance exam results in favor of male applicants and hiding the discriminatory practice, their lawyers said Wednesday.
A university investigative panel said Tuesday it had identified 69 people, including at least 55 women, who were rejected due to the university’s systematic alteration of the scores of female applicants and applicants who had failed its entrance exams multiple times in the past.
The group of lawyers said over 20 former applicants who took the university’s entrance exam in 2006 and later plan to file a request with the university on Monday demanding that it pay ¥100,000 ($900) in damages for every year an applicant took its entrance exams, refund exam fees and cover other associated costs such as traveling expenses. They will also demanded that the university disclose their exam scores.
They said filing a lawsuit was an option if they do not get a satisfactory response from the university in two weeks.
The investigative panel has already urged the university to compensate those affected and consider accepting them into its program, among other measures to redress their grievances.
“We were appalled by the large number of people who were rejected” as a result of the manipulation, said Yukiko Tsunoda, who heads the lawyers’ group, referring to the findings of the investigative panel.
“It is terrifying to think this would have been shrouded in darkness if it wasn’t exposed,” she added.
Tokyo Medical University admitted in August it had manipulated exam scores for over 10 years to curb female enrollment, which officials claimed was to avoid a shortage of doctors at affiliated hospitals on the grounds that female doctors tend to resign or take long periods of leave after getting married or giving birth.
The group of lawyers plans to assist more applicants as their number is expected to grow after the education ministry, which is conducting a survey of 81 universities with medical departments, said Tuesday that similar malpractice had been found at other institutions.
In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.