The recent news that two of the most popular English-language proficiency tests in Japan can no longer be accepted as prerequisites for student visas to Britain may have come as a shock to students, parents and test administrators. But the exams have long been suspected of having problems, even as they proliferated.

The refusal to accept TOEIC and TOEFL exams were the result of the uncovering of fraud at a testing center by a BBC program. It will be hard to calculate the loss of confidence in such exams that will result from the BBC’s reporting.

The announcement should also come as a bit of an embarrassment to the administration of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who recently suggested the possibility of using the two exams as part of the admission and graduation requirements for Japanese universities.

While the intention was surely a good one — to improve the level of English in Japan — if test fraud is so easy to perpetrate and to uncover, it may not be the best choice of exam here, either.

In addition to the inconvenience to many students who must now switch to other exams in order to apply for visas to U.K. universities, the ban will only make it harder for Japanese students to convince themselves to study abroad.

Students should understand that such tests are only one small step in the process, and that the value of studying abroad is immense.

While the exams have expanded in recent years to include the measurement of more active skills, such as essay writing and speaking, they are still an incomplete assessment of any student’s overall ability to study well in English.

Such exams can only be a rough measure and should amount to just one aspect of any application to university study. As with entrance exams in Japan, they are often considered the single most important point for entering many schools.

The spotlight on the tests should also highlight how much money is involved in the international English testing industry. The practice books, preparation courses and test-taking fees have continued to rise over the years and now form a significant barrier to students who cannot afford all the expenses. Continued reliance on such exams to evaluate students does not help students really learn English, or any other subject for that matter.

The over-emphasis on passing such exams comes at the expense of building up other creative and critical skills that really are needed for serious study.

The exams alone are not adequate for testing the truly important interpersonal, communicative skills that are the most needed, both in school and in real life.

In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.