OPEC+ is heading for a politically consequential showdown with U.S. President Joe Biden as Saudi Arabia and its allies weigh up whether to heed American demands for more oil.
If the cartel rebuffs the request, it’s headed for a bare-knuckle fight with the White House, which is worried that inflation caused by high energy prices could derail its economic agenda. Bowing to the pressure and opening the taps would keep Saudi Arabia’s closest ally onside, at the expense of the hard-won crude price recovery that has swelled the kingdom’s coffers.
“You take a look at oil prices,” Biden told reporters at a news conference at the United Nations climate summit in Glasgow, Scotland, on Tuesday. Fuel costs are high because of “the refusal of Russia or the OPEC nations to pump more oil.”
It’s a fight that transcends the oil market and goes deep into America’s troubled relationship with longstanding allies in the Middle East. Biden has so far refused to speak with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, infuriating the royal palace in Riyadh, which had nearly unfettered access to the White House during the Trump administration.
Despite the president’s arm-twisting, which has been supported by Japan and India, several key members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies show little sign of bending. Iraq and Kuwait, for example, have said publicly that they should stick to the current plan — reviving just 400,000 barrels a day of idle supply each month and leaving the market in deficit for the rest of the year.
That outcome is widely expected by OPEC-watchers, yet the diplomatic pressure continued on Wednesday, according to people familiar with the conversations, opening the door for a potential last minute deal.
“OPEC+ is likely to stick with the 400,000 barrel-a-day tapering plan tomorrow,” said Bob McNally, president of consultant Rapidan Energy Group and a former White House official. “Barring a last minute Washington-Riyadh deal or arm twist.”
Either way, the oil market may be in for a volatile few weeks as the conflict between the world’s largest producers and consumers plays out in the aftermath of Thursday’s OPEC+ meeting. That was evident on Wednesday, as crude futures had dropped 3.6% to $80.93 a barrel as of 12:22 p.m. in New York.
If OPEC+ does bow to American demands, it’s unclear how much extra oil beyond the planned 400,000 barrel-a-day increase would be enough for Biden. But if the cartel were to pledge an increase of 600,000 or even 800,000 barrels a day for December, there would be questions about whether the group could follow through.
The group is already struggling to meet its monthly output targets, as lack of investment in oilfields in countries such as Angola, Nigeria and even Kuwait hamper production. Saudi Arabia, Russia and the United Arab Emirates may be have the capacity to exceed their quotas to compensate for the weaker countries, but doing so would require changes to the existing OPEC+ deal.
One reason for OPEC+ resistance is the risk that, if the extra oil were supplied, it could tip markets swiftly in the other direction. Supply is tight now, but the balance is expected to shift back into surplus early next year.
“OPEC+ expects a challenging year in 2022,” said Matthew Holland, analyst at consultant Energy Aspects Ltd. Some members think that any extra barrels added now will only to need to be removed from the market later. “The bar for OPEC+ to add more than 400,000 barrels a day in December is extremely high,” he said.
If OPEC+ does ignore Biden’s request, the U.S. has other tools at its disposal. It could revive antitrust legislation against OPEC+, something unlikely to have any price impact in the short-term. There are more radical measures, such as banning American crude exports, but those could hurt the U.S. domestic oil industry and further disrupt global markets.
The most potent and perhaps most likely measure would be a release from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Such action could have an even larger impact on prices if it were done in conjunction with other industrialized nations that are members of the International Energy Agency.
India and China, the largest oil consumers in Asia that have their own strategic reserves outside the IEA system, could also be asked to join.
Since the creation of the IEA in 1974, there have been three coordinated releases from emergency fuel stockpiles. The first was in the buildup to the Gulf War in 1991, after Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait shut down a large portion of Middle Eastern crude exports. The second followed Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, which badly damaged offshore U.S. oil facilities in 2005. The most recent action was in 2011, to mitigate the supply disruption caused by the Libyan civil war.
“We think the Biden administration is prepared to release crude from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve in an effort to cap prices,” said Helima Croft, commodities strategist at RBC Capital Markets LLC and a former CIA analyst.
In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.