• Bloomberg, Reuters


U.S. President Donald Trump’s latest trade gamble has set the stage for a tense round of negotiations this week between the U.S. and China, which has the markets on edge.

Trump’s unpredictability was on full display Sunday, when he took to Twitter to abruptly announce he’s increasing tariffs on Chinese goods. The U.S. says that threat was prompted by Beijing reneging over the past week on some key commitments it made during the talks.

A diplomatic cable from Beijing arrived in Washington late on Friday night, with systematic edits to a nearly 150-page draft trade agreement that has blown up months of negotiations between the world’s two largest economies, according to three U.S. government sources and three private sector sources briefed on the talks.

In each of the seven chapters of the draft trade deal, China had deleted its commitments to change laws to resolve core complaints that caused the United States to launch the trade war: theft of U.S. intellectual property and trade secrets, forced technology transfers, competition policy, access to financial services, and currency manipulation.

Chinese negotiators said they couldn’t touch the laws, said one of the government sources, calling the changes “major.”

Changing any law in China requires a unique set of processes that can’t be navigated quickly, said a Chinese official familiar with the talks.

Whether the world’s two largest economies will sink deeper into their trade conflict may depend on negotiations Thursday and Friday, when a Chinese delegation led by Vice Premier Liu He will visit Washington.

The hawkish turn by the U.S. has forced investors, many of whom were expecting a deal soon, to adjust their expectations. The S&P 500 index has fallen more than 2 percent since Trump’s tweet.

The 225-issue Nikkei average tumbled 321.13 points, or 1.46 percent, from Tuesday to 21,602.59, its lowest close since April 2, amid fears over the trade row, which has renewed concern about global growth.

The index lost about 650 points over two days after trading resumed following the unprecedented 10-day holiday through Monday to celebrate the new emperor’s ascension to the throne.

“A trade deal had been priced into markets and now we are living through the fallout of altered expectations, so it wouldn’t be surprising to see continued volatility,” said Kristina Hooper, chief global market strategist for Invesco Ltd. “We’re going to see both sides playing a game of chicken.”

There are several possible outcomes from this week’s negotiations.

A first scenario could see tariffs rise amid ongoing talks.

U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer said tariffs on $200 billion in Chinese imports will increase to 25 percent from 10 percent at 12:01 a.m. on Friday. He also indicated the U.S. wants to keep talking.

The Chinese are preparing their own retaliatory duties on U.S. imports should Trump carry out his threat, according to people familiar with the matter. But they, too, are staying at the table.

It’s an awkward equilibrium, but it may just hold. Neither country wants a long, bruising trade war that undermines growth. The incentive to reach a deal grows stronger by the day for Trump, who’s seeking re-election in November 2020.

“Both sides would walk away angry” if tariffs escalate this week, said Clark Packard, trade policy counsel at the R Street Institute, a think tank in Washington. “But these two countries are the largest economies in the world. After a cooling-off period, they’ll come back to the table.”

Another scenario would see tariffs rise and talks collapse, with the stakes arguably higher than ever as both countries prepare to slap more tariffs on each other.

In an all-out trade-war scenario, annual gross domestic product may shrink by as much as 0.6 percent in the U.S. and by 1.5 percent in China, according to the International Monetary Fund.

“My most likely scenario is that there’s no final resolution, not for some time,” said Chris Rupkey, chief financial economist at MUFG Union Bank NA. “They’re talking about changing the way another country is doing business. It’s like another country telling the U.S. to stop being capitalist.”

The increase in tariffs could also be delayed by a truce, as was the case late last year.

Tariffs have been on hold since Dec. 1, when Trump and Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping agreed to a truce to give their officials time to work out an agreement. Before then, the two nations had imposed duties on $360 billion of each other’s products.

The truce, as well as a dovish shift by central banks, has driven a surge in U.S. stocks. Trump will be reluctant to see the rally end. If talks take a promising turn, he may still hold off on a tariff hike.

“This is something you have to take week by week,” said Ed Mills, managing director of Washington policy at Raymond James & Associates Inc. “Our base case for this week is that they find a way to delay the tariffs.”

Finally, a deal in principle could still be reached.

Before threatening to hike tariffs, Trump expressed optimism about the prospect of a deal. A preliminary agreement could come together quickly if Trump chooses to endorse it, perhaps after speaking by phone with Xi.

The outlines of a deal have been apparent for months. It would likely feature a major increase in Chinese purchases of American goods such as soybeans and aircraft. Beijing would probably commit to shoring up protection for U.S. intellectual property and refraining from devaluing its currency. It’s all but certain both sides would tout any pact as a victory. The biggest question left unanswered is whether the existing tariffs would stay in place.

But any preliminary accord would probably require final approval by Trump and Xi at a face-to-face summit. Even after a deal is signed, it could take years to see it succeed in correcting the trade imbalance. The threat of renewed hostilities won’t soon fade.

“The larger question is: Can you get a deal, and can that deal stick? That’s where we’ve always been skeptical,” said Mills of Raymond James.

Information from Kyodo added.

In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.