• Reuters


Japan and the United States unveiled new guidelines for defense cooperation on Monday, reflecting Japan’s willingness to take on a more robust international role at a time of growing Chinese power and rising concerns about nuclear-armed North Korea.

The first revision to the guidelines since 1997 allows for global cooperation militarily, ranging from defense against ballistic missile, cyber and space attacks and maritime security, following a Japanese Cabinet resolution last year reinterpreting Japan’s pacifist constitution to allow the exercise of the right to “collective self-defense.”

The guidelines reflect a changing world and mean Japan could shoot down missiles heading toward the United States and come to the aid of third countries under attack.

A centerpiece of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s U.S. visit this week, the guidelines are part of Abe’s wider signal that Japan is ready to take more responsibility for its security as China modernizes its military and flexes its muscles in Asia.

In return, the conservative Japanese leader, who is scheduled to meet U.S. President Barack Obama on Tuesday, has been seeking fresh assurances that America comes to Japan’s aid if necessary in a clash with China.

A joint statement issued after the meeting “reconfirmed the alliance’s commitment to the security of Japan,” as well as Japan’s sovereignty over islets in the East China Sea known as the Senkakus in Japan and the Diaoyus in China that are the subject of a bitter territorial dispute.

The surge in China’s military spending since 1997, when the last U.S.-Japan defense cooperation guidelines were issued, and its more assertive stance in maritime and territorial disputes has worried both Japan and U.S. allies in Southeast Asia.

Announced after a meeting of the U.S. and Japanese foreign and defense ministers in New York, the guidelines eliminate geographic restrictions that had largely limited joint work to the defense of Japan and the surrounding area, a senior U.S. official said.

“We will be able to do globally what we’ve been able to do in the defense of Japan and regionally,” the official said, adding that the new guidelines also meant Japan “can respond to attacks on third countries, not just the United States.”

The changes would allow greater coordination and information sharing, for example, in missile defense, and allow Japan to shoot down any missiles heading for U.S. territory or to defend U.S. ships engaged in missile-defense in the vicinity of Japan, he said.

At a joint news conference of the two nations’ foreign and defense ministers, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry called the first revision of the guidelines since 1997 “an historic transition.”

In a pointed message to Beijing over its increasing assertiveness in the region, Kerry said the United States rejects any suggestion that freedom of navigation and overflight were “privileges granted by big states to small ones subject to the whim and fancy of the big state.”

The guidelines are expected to lead to greater U.S.-Japan coordination in the South China Sea, where China and other regional states have competing claims on scattered islands.

However, at the news conference, Japanese Defense Minister Gen Nakatani and Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida repeatedly dodged questions about the possibility of joint patrols of Asian maritime shipping lanes, saying legislation in Japan had still to be worked out and regional countries consulted.

Asked about joint patrols, Obama’s chief East Asia adviser, Evan Medeiros, said Washington and Tokyo were “in lock step” on the need for freedom of navigation and unimpeded commerce and that China’s reclamation and building work on disputed South China Sea reefs presented “real challenges.”

“The speed, the scale and the scope of this is very problematic . . . raising anxiety,” he told reporters.

China’s statement this month that reclaimed land would be used for defense had “raised all sorts of questions among Southeast Asian countries, in the United States, in Tokyo about what China’s long-term strategic intentions are,” Medeiros added.

Despite U.S. assurances of its military commitment, worries persist in Tokyo that one day Washington, which is reining in its defense spending and is deeply intertwined economically with China, may not come to Japan’s defense, for example in a clash with Beijing over the disputed East China Sea territory.

Patrol ships and military aircraft from both countries have routinely shadowed each other near the tiny islands since then, raising fears that an unintended collision or other incident could develop into a larger clash.

Obama has said the Japanese-controlled isles are covered by a bilateral security treaty obliging the United States to defend Japan, but Washington has also made clear it does not want to get dragged into a Sino-Japanese conflict.

On Tuesday, South Korea responded cautiously, demanding close consultations on issues concerning security on the Korean peninsula.

Seoul had been concerned that the new rules for defense cooperation unveiled on Monday might allow Japan to exercise the doctrine of collective self-defense around the Korean peninsula without its consent.

“The government expects the United States and Japan . . . to implement the guidelines in ways that contribute to regional peace and stability and to maintain close consultations with us in issues relating to security on the Korean peninsula and our national interests,” South Korea’s foreign ministry said in a statement on Tuesday.

The revisions to the guidelines reflect a profound evolution in Japanese security policy.

In the most dramatic shift since Japan’s military was rebuilt after World War II, Abe’s Cabinet in July reinterpreted the Constitution’s pacifist Article 9 to allow Japan’s armed forces to provide military aid to the United States and other friendly countries under attack.

The shift, to be enabled by legislation later this year, will allow Japan’s military to take actions such as mine-sweeping during hostilities in the Hormuz Strait in the Gulf. It will also allow logistical support for U.S. forces in conflicts beyond Japan’s immediate neighborhood without a specific law for each operation, Japanese lawmakers and government sources said.

A key Liberal Democratic Party lawmaker said Abe’s ruling LDP party wants to revise the Constitution by late 2018 to remove constraints on his defense strategy and avoid time-consuming legal gymnastics over the interpretation of the current charter.

In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.