Ukraine, rebels vow to back peace plan, cease-fire


Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and the main pro-Russian rebel leader said they would both order cease-fires on Friday, provided that an agreement is signed on a new peace plan to end the five-month war in Ukraine’s east.

The breakthrough came after a week in which the pro-Moscow separatists scored major victories with what NATO says is the open support of thousands of Russian troops.

Speaking on the sidelines of a NATO summit in Wales, Poroshenko said the cease-fire would be conditional on a planned meeting going ahead in Minsk on Friday of envoys from Ukraine, Russia and Europe’s OSCE security watchdog.

“At 1400 local time, provided the (Minsk) meeting takes place, I will call on the General Staff to set up a bilateral cease-fire and we hope that the implementation of the peace plan will begin tomorrow,” he told reporters.

Alexander Zakharchenko, head of the main rebel Donetsk People’s Republic, said in a statement his men would also order a cease-fire, from one hour later, provided that Kiev’s representatives signed up to a peace plan at the Minsk meeting.

There have been local agreements to hold fire, for example during the recovery of bodies from a Malaysian airliner shot down over rebel territory in July, but Thursday’s announcements were the first time the two sides have called for a full truce.

Rebels still expressed skepticism. Oleg Tsaryov, a senior rebel official, told Reuters the separatist truce would depend on the government providing guarantees, “because in the past we had some cease-fire agreements Poroshenko didn’t honor.”

A source close to Zakharchenko said government forces bombarded Donetsk within 15 minutes of Poroshenko’s announcement of the cease-fire plan: “We’ll see how the talks go tomorrow, but it won’t be easy. All this talk of truce amid more and more shelling.”

The announcements come a day after Russia’s President Vladimir Putin put forward a seven-point peace plan, which would end the fighting in Ukraine’s east, bring in outside monitors and aid, while leaving rebels in control of their territory.

To keep the pressure up on Russia, a White House official attending the NATO summit said the United States was preparing a new round of economic sanctions, but progress toward a truce could halt new European financial sanctions that EU leaders had been expected to agree on Friday. French President Francois Hollande said the decision on the sanctions package would depend “on the coming hours.”

There is no sign of a halt in fighting in the east, where rebels have rapidly advanced in the past week, backed by what Kiev and NATO say is the support of thousands of Russian troops with artillery and tanks. Moscow denies its troops are there.

Reuters journalists heard explosions and saw columns of smoke on the eastern outskirts of Mariupol, a government-held port of 500,000 people that is the next big city in the path of the rebel advance. A Ukrainian military source said troops were bracing for a potential attack on the city.

Government shells rained down overnight on a residential district of Donetsk, capital of one of the rebels’ two self-proclaimed independent states.

The West has backed Kiev by imposing economic sanctions on Moscow, but has also made clear it will not fight to protect the country, where pro-Russian rebels rose up in two provinces after Moscow annexed the Crimea peninsula in March.

Poroshenko was invited to meet U.S. President Barack Obama, Germany’s Angela Merkel, France’s Francois Hollande and other Western leaders at the NATO summit in Wales, hosted by Britain’s David Cameron.

The summit stage was set with harsh words for Russia: “To the east, Russia has ripped up the rule book with its illegal, self-declared annexation of Crimea and its troops on Ukrainian soil threatening and undermining a sovereign nation state,” Obama and Cameron wrote in a joint newspaper editorial.

But after the announcement of the potential cease-fire, Western officials appeared to take a softer line. German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said he was moderately optimistic that de-escalation could be achieved.

The prospect of a cease-fire could also give France an opportunity to reverse a decision to postpone the delivery of a French helicopter carrier warship to Russia, due next month.

“What are the conditions (of delivering the ship)? A cease-fire and a political settlement. Today those conditions are not in place,” Hollande said. If there were further complications the delivery would be delayed, but the contract would not be suspended, he added.

Moscow had accused him of caving in to U.S. political pressure: “France’s reputation as a reliable partner that carries out its contractual obligations has been thrown into the furnace of American political ambitions,” Russian Foreign Ministry deputy spokeswoman Maria Zakharova wrote on Facebook.

The past few days have seen conflicting signals from both Moscow and Kiev. Putin made a number of belligerent statements over the past week before unveiling his peace proposal on Wednesday and discussing it by telephone with Poroshenko.

The Ukrainian leader hinted at a possible cease-fire on his website on Wednesday, but that wording was later dropped. His prime minister, Arseny Yatseniuk, derided Putin’s peace proposal as a “deception” and said Putin’s real aim was to “destroy Ukraine and restore the Soviet Union.”

Ukraine has previously refused to discuss any political deal with the rebels, calling them terrorists and proxies of Moscow. But with the hope evaporating of a swift victory, Poroshenko may have felt it is now time to hear the Kremlin’s offer.

This week the rebels dropped a demand for full independence and said they would accept some kind of special status in Ukraine. That lifts one of the main obstacles to peace talks.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov discussed the cease-fire with his French and German counterparts, and accused Washington of trying to undermine the nascent peace process.

Putin’s peace offer would leave rebels in control of territory that accounts for a tenth of Ukraine’s population and an even larger chunk of its industry. It would also require Ukraine to remain unaligned. Kiev had said last week it would try to join NATO, although full membership is unlikely since several members oppose it.

The rebels said they would agree as part of the cease-fire to allow a humanitarian corridor for aid and refugees. The truce would be monitored by observers from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.

On the ground, there has so far been no sign yet of any cease-fire. Government forces shelled the southern outskirts of the rebel bastion of Donetsk overnight.

Houses in Donetsk’s leafy Petrovka district were pockmarked with shrapnel. Residents had sought refuge in a bomb shelter.

“I don’t think they can reach any agreements now. Each side comes up with conditions unacceptable for the other. And so we get shelled,” said Lena, who declined to give her surname.

Reuters journalists saw a rebel column including a tank driving south from Donetsk toward the village of Berezovo. Residents said three burnt out military trucks in the village had carried Ukrainian troops that came under attack.

Government troops had been on the offensive since Poroshenko took office in June, squeezing the rebels into two provincial capitals, Donetsk and Luhansk. But last week the rebels turned the tide with an advance along the coast of the Sea of Azov.

A NATO officer, speaking on condition of anonymity, said NATO believed several thousand Russian troops were in Ukraine with hundreds of tanks and armored vehicles.

  • preventallwarsdotorg

    This ceasefire would not have occurred but for Mr. Poroshenko’s personal commitment to peace.
    “The highest value is human life, and we must do everything possible to stop the bloodshed and put an end to suffering;
    “I have given orders to the chief of my military to declare a cease-fire,” said Mr. Poroshenko, the President of Ukraine.

    Thanks Mr. Poroshenko for the high value you have placed on the lives of all Ukrainians, its soldiers and the rebels.

    He was only recently elected into office and has indeed succeeded in stunting the effects of the pro-war utterances/activities of some of his ruling political colleagues of the ‘Svoboda’ party – with a slogan of: ’20 years of Fight’!

    An atypical national political leader who does not seem interested in scoring short-term personal political advantages by using up the blood and suffering of his people, Mr. Poroshenko is politically an Independent and has been a very successful businessman. He has a deep understanding of the wastefulness of all wars and the fact, that nowadays, negotiations are always required for deriving war prevention or to stop them.

    Generally, it is too convenient for national political leaders to easily order their barracked soldiers out to their early deaths in wars; and that, only for securing their personal political objectives. Mr. Poroshenko seem different.

    In the short-term, some unwieldy political opponents may now consider that they have scored some military/political victories at his expense. However, in the long-term, Ukraine, under Mr. Poroshenko’s calm, patriotic and honest leadership, will prevail.