American tribes to eject members

Thousands of Indians set to be 'disenrolled,' left without an identity and share of revenues


Mia Prickett’s ancestor was a leader of the Cascade Indians along the Columbia River and one of the chiefs who signed an 1855 treaty that helped establish the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde in Oregon.

But the Grand Ronde now wants to disenroll Prickett and 79 of her relatives, and possibly hundreds of other tribal members, because they no longer satisfy new enrollment requirements.

Prickett’s family is fighting the effort, part of what some experts have dubbed the “disenrollment epidemic” — a rising number of dramatic clashes over tribal belonging that are sweeping through more than a dozen states, from California to Michigan.

“In my entire life, I have always known I was an Indian. I have always known my family’s history, and I am so proud of that,” Prickett said. She said her ancestor Chief Tumulth was unjustly accused of participating in a revolt and executed by the U.S. Army — and hence did not make it onto the tribe’s roll, which is now a membership requirement.

Some tribal members were recently cast out for being enrolled in two tribes, which is prohibited. But for Prickett’s relatives, who were tribal members before the casino was built, the reasons were unclear.

The prospect of losing her membership is “gut-wrenching,” Prickett said.

“It’s like coming home one day and having the keys taken from you,” she said. “You’re culturally homeless.”

The enrollment battles come at a time when many tribes — long poverty-stricken and oppressed by government policies — are finally coming into their own, gaining wealth and building infrastructure using revenues from Indian casinos.

Critics of disenrollment say that the rising tide of tribal expulsions is due to greed over increased gambling profits, along with political in-fighting and old family and personal feuds.

But at the core of the problem, tribes and experts agree, is a debate over identity — over who is “Indian enough” to be a tribal member.

“It ultimately comes down to the question of how we define what it means to be native today,” said David Wilkins, a political science professor at the University of Minnesota and member of North Carolina’s Lumbee tribe. “As tribes who suffered genocidal policies, boarding school laws and now out-marriage try to recover their identity in the 20th century, some are more fractured, and they appear to lack the kind of common elements that lead to true cohesion.”

Wilkins, who has tracked the recent increase in disenrollment across America, says tribes have kicked out thousands of people.

Historically, ceremonies and prayers — not disenrollment — were used to resolve conflicts because tribes are essentially family-based, and “you don’t cast out your relatives,” Wilkins said. Banishment was used in rare, egregious situations to cast out tribal members who committed crimes such as murder or incest.

Most tribes have based their membership criteria on “blood quantum” (the proportion of ancestry from a group that a person has) or on descent from someone named on a tribe’s census rolls or treaty records — old documents that can be flawed.

There are 566 federally recognized tribes, and determining membership has long been considered a hallmark of tribal sovereignty.

Mass disenrollment battles started in the 1990s, just as Indian casinos were becoming profitable. Since then, Indian gambling revenues have skyrocketed from $5.4 billion in 1995 to a record $27.9 billion in 2012.

Tribes have used the money to build housing, schools and roads, and to fund tribal health care and scholarships. They have also distributed casino profits to individual tribal members.

Of the nearly 240 tribes that run more than 420 gaming establishments across 28 states, half distribute a regular per capita payout to their members. Membership reductions lead to increases in the payments — though tribes deny money is a factor in disenrollment.

Disputes over money come on top of other issues for tribes. American Indians have one of the highest rates of interracial marriage in the U.S., leading some tribes in recent years to eliminate or reduce their blood quantum requirements. Also, many Native Americans don’t live on reservations, speak native languages or “look” Indian, making others question their bloodline claims.

Across America, disenrollment has played out in dramatic, emotional ways that have left communities reeling and cast-out members stripped of their payouts, health benefits, fishing rights, pensions and scholarships.

In central California, the Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians has disenrolled hundreds. Last year, sheriff’s deputies were called to break up a violent skirmish between two tribal factions that left several people injured.

In Washington, after the Nooksack Tribal Council voted to disenroll 306 members over documentation errors, those affected sued in tribal and federal courts. They say the tribe, which has two casinos but gives no member payouts, was racially motivated because the families being cast out are part Filipino. Last week, the Nooksack Court of Appeals declined to stop the disenrollments.

And in Michigan, where Saginaw Chippewa membership grew once the tribe started giving out yearly per capita casino payments that peaked at $100,000, a recent decline in gambling profits led to disenrollment battles targeting hundreds.