ANA, JAL, Peach now disregard China ADIZ


ANA Holdings Inc. and Japan Airlines Co., the nation’s largest carriers, flew through China’s newly declared air defense identification zone without notifying the country after Japan asked airlines to stop giving flight information to China.

ANA’s flight from Tokyo touched down in Taipei at 1:11 p.m. Japan time, said Yoichi Uchida, a spokesman for the company. JAL’s flight from Osaka touched down in Taipei at 12:24 p.m., Kazunori Kidosaki, an airline spokesman, said.

The Japanese government on Tuesday told its domestic airlines to stop providing flight information to China, which has mandated that planes give details when flying through the new ADIZ it unilaterally declared. Japan has denounced the move and the U.S. military flew two unarmed B-52 bombers into the area, which includes the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea that are controlled by Japan but claimed by China, which calls them the Diaoyu.

Peach Aviation Ltd., a low-fare carrier affiliated with ANA Holdings Inc., said it also flew safely through the new Chinese ADIZ after Japan on Tuesday asked carriers to stop giving flight information to China.

The Wednesday morning flight from Osaka to Taipei was uneventful, Peach spokesman Naoto Domeki said. ANA and JAL separately said Tuesday they are reversing an earlier decision and would stop reporting flight plans for planes traveling through the Chinese zone that Japan rejects.

ANA and JAL said they would halt the sharing of the flight-plan data starting Wednesday, spokesmen said.

The carriers shifted their stance on instructions from the Scheduled Airlines Association of Japan, the airlines’ trade group, which acted as an intermediary between the airlines and the Civil Aviation Bureau, said Maho Ito, an ANA spokeswoman.

The U.S. military flew two unarmed B-52s into the zone without incident, according to a Pentagon. China announced the ADIZ effective Nov. 23 and said its military will take “defensive emergency measures” if aircraft enter the area without reporting flight plans or identifying themselves.

The information ANA had been supplying to China was the same shared with other countries, according to Ryosei Nomura, a spokesman for the Tokyo-based carrier. The data included planes’ routes, cruising altitudes and flight times, Nomura said.

Other countries’ carriers are awaiting government guidance.

“There has been no change to our operations,” Lee Hyo-min, a spokeswoman for Seoul-based Asiana Airlines Inc., said Tuesday. “We have not yet provided any flight plans to China on services that pass through the zone because there has been no guideline from the government. We will make changes if and when the government revises this guideline.”

Hong Kong-based Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. said its flight operations are normal. The creation of the zone hasn’t affected operations of commercial flights so far, the International Air Transport Association said in an emailed response.

“Some airlines have had to take some extra steps at the moment, such as filing flight plans manually,” IATA said. “We are trying to get more details from the Chinese authorities to clarify ongoing operational requirements.”

The announcement of the zone follows a decision by Communist Party leaders this month, after a meeting led by President Xi Jinping, to form a state committee to coordinate security issues as China broadens its military reach.

  • Mike Wyckoff

    I don’t blame JAL or ANA, they are private companies interested in making a profit above protecting national pride. They are correct not to get into the politics as doing such could backfire and give china reason to remove key landing slots at Beijing, Shanghai and HK airports.
    This matter doesn’t and shouldn’t concern businesses, it’s for the govt to deal with.

    Having said that, I personally think the ADIZ is a load of crap.

  • SooKim475

    Just a few hard facts:

    1. Japan had ADIZ since 1969, the area of Japan’s ADIZ is 5 times the Japan’s domestic territory area. While China’s ADIZ area is a fraction (<10%) of their territory area.
    2. US developed the ADIZ back in 1950.
    3. There are 20+ countries had their own ADIZ in this world, including Korea, Japan, RC (republic of China, Taiwan area), Phillipine, etc.
    4. China publicly acknowledged they may consider withdrawal ADIZ, conditionally on Japan withdrawal their 1st, after 44 years of Japan’s withdrawal.
    5. When Korea, Japan, RC (republic of China, Taiwan area), Phillipine set up their own ADIZ, none of these countries consulted China.

  • SooKim475

    Take an east asia history 101, then you will know Potsdam Declaration and Cairo Communiqué said:

    “Japanese sovereignty shall be limited to the islands of Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku and such minor islands as we determine.” As had been announced in the Cairo Declaration in 1943.

    Who is trying to change the rule set by world war II? Did the above wording clear enough?

    Only another world war can change the rule of world war II, just like a decision of a meeting can’t be changed by a few persons in a dark room without calling another meeting with all previous attendees invited. Whoever challenge the rule of world war II is an aggressor in this world. Whoever challenge the rule of world war II is calling world war III.

  • SooKim475

    What US should do is to patent the ADIZ back in 1950s. Then all the 20+ countries have to pay US loyalty for using the ADIZ system, including China.