Soot ranked second-worst climate factor

2012 global average makes top 10 of hottest years on record

The Washington Post

Soot ranks as the second-largest human contributor to climate change, according to a new analysis released Tuesday, exerting twice as much of an impact as previously thought.

The four-year, 232-page study of black carbon, published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, shows that short-lived pollution known as soot, for instance emissions from diesel engines and wood-fired stoves, has about two-thirds the climate impact of carbon dioxide. The analysis has pushed methane, which comes from landfills and other forces, to third place as a human contributor to global warming.

Black carbon, or soot, accelerates warming because the fine particles absorb heat when they are in the air and when they darken snow and ice. Although some lighter-colored fine particles can have a cooling effect because they block sunlight, other black carbon sources have a warming effect because they absorb it. They also accelerate glacier melting and can disrupt regional weather patterns.

The findings came out on the same day that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration announced last year’s global average temperature ranked as the 10th warmest on record, and NASA declared it was the ninth warmest. The two agencies analyze temperature data differently, but both found that with the exception of 1998, the nine warmest years since 1880 all have occurred since 2000.

Piers Forster, one of the soot study’s authors and a professor at the University of Leeds’ School of Earth and Environment in England, said in a statement that reducing black carbon can help address rising temperatures.

“There are exciting opportunities to cool climate by reducing soot emissions but it is not straightforward,” Forster said, adding that cutting emissions from diesel engines and domestic wood and coal fires is “a no-brainer” because it would improve public health and the climate. Fine particles cause heart and respiratory problems, leading to premature death, as well as asthma and other illnesses.

These emissions cuts would produce an immediate cooling effect, the authors estimated, which would avoid nearly a 1-degree Fahrenheit (0.56 Celsius) temperature rise in the near term.

“You save lives, and you produce really fast cooling,” said Durwood Zaelke, president of the Institute for Governance and Sustainable Development.

Veerabhadran Ramanathan, an atmospheric scientist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the University of California, San Diego, identified black carbon in 2008 as the second-biggest human contributor to climate change.

However, a number of researchers questioned his analysis because it was based on observations rather than computer modeling. “We seem to have put one major debate behind us, that black carbon is a significant contributor to the planet’s heat,” Ramanathan said in an interview.

Although the United States has made major strides in curbing soot — Ramanathan and his colleagues recently found that black carbon concentrations in California have fallen by 50 percent in the past 25 years, largely because of stricter diesel emissions rules — Southeast Asia and China still suffer major pollution from diesel engines and wood- and coal-burning combustion.

Just this week, for example, the Chinese capital experienced a string of hazardous air days, driven, in part, by soot emissions.

The new study’s authors emphasized that in the long term, major cuts in carbon dioxide would be required to avert dangerous climate impacts.

“Mitigating black carbon is good for curbing short-term climate change, but to really solve the long-term climate problem, carbon dioxide emissions must also be reduced,” said one of the paper’s lead authors, Tami Bond, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

Coronavirus banner