Abe vows to help women in workforce

More day care centers, longer leave among latest pledges


Staff Writer

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe set forth on Friday new goals to spur economic growth by tapping the potential of women in the workforce, including dramatically increasing the number of day care centers and giving both men and women longer child care leave.

To shorten the waiting lists for day care centers, the government will encourage the building of more facilities through deregulation and subsidies, Abe said at the Japan National Press Club. The goal will be to accommodate 200,000 more children nationwide by 2015 and another 200,000 by 2017.

The government meanwhile will establish a subsidy for companies that allow men and women to leave their jobs until their children are 3 years old, he said. Currently, workers are entitled to take infant-related leave of 12 to 18 months.

To make sure such people return to the labor force once the leave is over, the government plans to set up another fund to help them recover their work skills, Abe said.

“Many women are still forced to make a choice between child-raising or quitting their job,” he said. “We will create a society where excellent workers will be able to play active roles. That will boost productivity of the whole society.

“I believe (utilization of women) should be the core of our strategy for (economic) growth,” he said.

Abe has been urged to hammer out strategies to spur real economic growth and not just create a financial bubble with fiscal spending.

Since taking power in December, he has surprised the world by advocating BOJ measures that have shoved Japanese stocks higher and the yen lower. However, many economists and market players fear the effects of “Abenomics” may not last over the long term.

“We should not be satisfied now. We need to make this bright sign (of economic recovery) stronger and sustainable,” Abe said Friday.

He has also been trying to win support from female voters ahead of the Upper House election in July. As part of this effort, he appointed Sanae Takaichi and Seiko Noda, both noted female lawmakers, to two of the Liberal Democratic Party’s top four executive posts.

The size of the new funds and the target number of workers to take longer child leave have yet to be decided, government officials said.

Meanwhile, Abe also said one of the administration’s key areas of focus will be advanced medicine, such as regenerative medicine that uses iPS cells.

  • chomskyite

    Which is better: tap the women of the nation and put them into the workforce into low paying jobs to boost the economy, while destroying the family fabric that keeps it together? Look how well it worked out for the USA, millions of frazzled parents playing hot potato with a child, just so they can pay the day-care center.

  • Glen Clancy

    Not very conservative of them.

  • YoDude12

    The is obviously a cost-benefit equation at work here. There aren’t enough jobs for recent college graduates, especially jobs that pay much more than minimum wage, so why encourage more women to enter the workforce if it isn’t absolutely necessary for their personal survival, or that of their family?
    So now Abe wants to spend money to help retrain women who have left the workforce. Tax money? This guy is leading Japan into a deeper fiscal hole than it is already in, and the vast majority of the populace has no idea what is coming. Increasing inflation for a country that imports the vast majority of its resources in the hope of increasing private consumption, thus tax revenue and all in the hope of eventual wage increases. The depreciating yen is going to put the consumer in a deeper hole, and the under-paid consumer is the up-and-coming consumer in this nation. Abe-nomics is as short sided as it could possibly be.

    • chomskyite

      Abe and Japan are at the end of the rope. They are pulling out all stops to revive the country. Of course who can blame him? All one has to do is read the headlines here day after day to see how all the old taboos are being thrown out the window in hopes of lightening up the sinking ship. History in the making.

    • Guest

      “so why encourage more women to enter the workforce if it isn’t absolutely necessary for their personal survival, or that of their
      family?” – – seriously?
      That’s like the “close the borders” rant, because the foreigners might take all of our resources and jobs.
      Graduating from college doesn’t make a worker worth their salt. They still have to be trained, perhaps for years, following college. If a female can do the job, why should she be denied employment simply based on gender?

  • “forced to make a choice”?

    As if they necessarily have to have children?