• Tokyo


I very much enjoyed the March 13 editorial, “Japan’s ambivalent English,” and I strongly agree with the argument that awareness of one’s cultural identity comes as much from comparison as from knowledge of oneself. I know this is true from the years I spent in Britain as a postgraduate student and as an interpreter. Having said that, however, the reasoning behind the main idea of the editorial is fundamentally flawed, mainly because it is apparently based on the idea that multilingualism is a panacea for many of Japan’s problems.

A country needs more than a good command of English to achieve economic development. Although India might not have developed as much as it has without fluency in English, the Indians owe their economic prosperity to many other factors also, particularly its supreme education system.

Unable to view this article?

This could be due to a conflict with your ad-blocking or security software.

Please add japantimes.co.jp and piano.io to your list of allowed sites.

If this does not resolve the issue or you are unable to add the domains to your allowlist, please see out this support page.

We humbly apologize for the inconvenience.

In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.