Human drivers biggest threat to developing self-driving cars



Japanese carmakers will have to convince the public that letting go of the steering wheel in a self-driving car is safe, while also dealing with the biggest threat to the cars’ security: the humans using them.

Toyota, Nissan and Honda are intent on putting autonomous cars on highways — as well as city streets for Nissan — by 2020, and the triumvirate keenly stressed the advances made so far at the recent Tokyo Motor Show.

Their stated goal — preventing traffic deaths — is laudable, but the technological arms race is also highly lucrative: Consultancy AT Kearney has estimated the market for self-driving cars could be worth more than $566 billion (¥69.4 trillion) by 2035.

Nissan Chief Executive Carlos Ghosn told reporters at the show it has high hopes the technology will save lives while altering car journeys forever.

“It compensates for human error, which causes more than 90 percent of all car accidents.

“As a result, time spent behind the wheel is safer, more efficient and more fun,” he said.

But Ghosn’s comments belie the work still to be done, as its engineers edge forward in steps rather than leaps.

Google offers promises of a fully autonomous car, but the nation’s automakers are taking a more gradual approach, focusing on aspects such as self-parking and crash avoidance technology.

Functions such as emergency braking and speed-limiting devices that track the distance between vehicles already exist, but getting drivers to abandon the steering wheel completely is a harder sell.

“We must make sure our clients understand how the machine works,” said Philippe Klein, Nissan’s chief planning officer.

To instill confidence, the artificial intelligence that will power Nissan’s autonomous cars will mirror the driver’s driving style as closely as possible, while “ironing out any bad habits,” the automaker said.

Obtaining the trust of drivers is crucial, as without it “we cannot move forward,” said Moritaka Yoshida, a Toyota executive.

And even if the user of a self-driving car is convinced of its superior safety, other road users need to feel secure sharing the road.

Manufacturers are experimenting with icons or written messages on windshields, warning sounds and, in one case, a light strip along the length of the car with a color and intensity that will change in different situations.

Intersections present a particular challenge, said Melissa Cefkin, who is based at Nissan’s Silicon Valley research center.

“Sometimes drivers communicate between themselves and with pedestrians or cyclists directly, by swapping looks, with a hand gesture, or even verbally,” she said.

“Sometimes it’s interpretative: We look for signals while judging the vehicle’s speed and movements.”

The tiny pointers that motorists pick up from one another are not yet within the reach of the technology.

“Currently, the machine isn’t capable of grasping all the subtlety of these clues,” Cefkin said.

To better understand them, Nissan is undertaking the immense task of studying thousands of intersection scenarios in an attempt to identify cultural patterns by country or context.

Besides, once everyone on the road feels comfortable with autonomous cars in their midst, the automakers will still have to convince regulators of their safety before they hit the streets.

“Today, you have to drive with your eyes on the road and your hands on the wheel. If the regulation doesn’t change, having a self-driving car will be totally useless,” said Nissan’s Ghosn.

“Everything depends on public-private cooperation,” he added.

Car companies are already conducting intense exchanges with such authorities across the globe, said Toyota’s Yoshida, adding he hopes that Europe, Japan and the United States will succeed in shaping the “global norms” for the industry.

This month, Toyota unveiled a vehicle that can drive itself along a highway, but CEO Akio Toyoda is acutely aware of the legal minefield his firm must navigate before putting it on commercial sale.

“Imagine if a major accident occurred that implicated a self-driving car. We have to go step by step,” Toyoda said.

And while humans may be the architects of their own downfall on the roads, self-driving technology cannot yet match our level of sensory perception, emphasized Honda Chairman Fumihiko Ike, urging caution over the limits of the technology in the short term.

“Human intelligence has no equal for working out what is happening on the road, so I think fundamentally it won’t be easy to leave it to the machine except in very restricted conditions such as motorways or specific routes,” Ike said.

  • Google tell you that how to EARN $65789.If you are some intelligent you make many more Dollars.I am also earning many more, my relatives wondered to see how i settle my Life in few days thank GOD to you for this…You can also make cash i never tell a lie you should check this I am sure you shocked to see this amazing offer…I’m Loving it!!!! ☻ ▼ ▼ ▼

    For more details click on my comment any where..It’s a great opportunity…..


  • AmIJustAPessimistOrWhat?

    The evolution of self driving cars will surely include incremental improvements in computer assisted driving. Two heads are better than one?

  • nanka

    “Two heads are better than one?” No, I think “Many cooks will spoil the porridge.” The best way to implement self steering cars is to cut the human driver out of the equation at all. A self steering car is more like a horizontal elevator and so should not be an individual, private property but part of a traffic system: I think, a company should own and operate all self steering cars: You press a Button in a smart phone app and one car stops in front of your house to pick you up. The car is just a cabin without any controls for steering exept destination input and emergency stop button, so no passenger interfers with the computer. Individual traffic has no future in a world of increasing population and so traffic.

    • Clickonthewhatnow

      That’s an interesting idea. That puts the question of legal liability to rest, too. The cost is one point that would be problematic.