/

Document release puts pressure on Tokyo

China shines light on past Japan wars

JIJI

China’s leadership is putting more pressure on Japan by emphasizing the history of wars between the two countries.

The Jilin Provincial Archives in northeast China recently released dozens of historical materials on the acts committed by the now-defunct Imperial Japanese Army.

But the Qiushi Journal, a magazine published by the Communist Party of China, is poised to push historical issues beyond the wars Japan waged against China in the 1930s and 1940s. It may soon assert that modern Japan’s aggression in China originated in the hallowed Meiji Era (1868-1912).

The party and the Chinese government decided to adopt the policy of using wartime history to isolate Japan after Prime Minister Shinzo Abe visited war-related Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo last December, a party official said.

With aggressive appeals both at home and abroad, they are believed to be aiming to build anti-Japanese sentiment ahead of the 70th anniversary of the end of World War II next year.

The Jilin Archives, which started releasing historical materials in January, said last Friday it had recently discovered 89 items relating to such issues as the Nanjing Massacre of 1937, the “comfort women” Japan forced to provide sex for its soldiers in military brothels, and Unit 731, a division of the Imperial Japanese Army that carried out research on biological warfare, including live vivisections.

The capital of the Manchukuo puppet state established by Japan between 1932 and 1945 was situated in what is now Jilin province.

The People’s Daily, the official newspaper of the Communist Party, devoted a full page to introducing the newly released materials, saying they filled gaps in studies on Japan’s aggression in China and restored the truth of history. A book containing a compilation of the materials has already been published.

Chinese authorities have stepped up publicity efforts targeting not only its people, but also foreign journalists, calling on them to support the government’s stance.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry has arranged tours for foreign journalists to visit war-related sites including the Museum of the War of Chinese People’s Resistance Against Japanese Aggression in Liaoning province in January, and the Memorial Hall of the Victims in Nanjing Massacre by Japanese Invaders in Jiangsu province in February.

The ministry also recently arranged a two-day tour to the Jilin Provincial Archives.

  • FRPSR

    All this effort to expose a foreign power seems a little backwards . Most if not all the difficulties facing China at the present have little to do with anything beyond the problems of their own policies .

    Issues of Chinas deliberate vagaries concerning neighboring littoral continental shelves are more likely then the insults of previous generations to create the sort of intractable deadly problems they are rehashing .
    Insisting first on “Eleven Dash” nonsense , and then apropos of nothing the “Nine Dash” nonsense , are more likely to raise invasions of angry neighbors than just about anything else that comes to mind .
    This game is played at the expense of progress . When “Leaders” decide they don’t know what to do , they may attempt to shift attention from disaster , to spin webs of distraction , while sinking deeper and deeper into the morass of inaction .

    China and Japan have very serious issues before them , not behind them .

  • Ron NJ

    Trust Chinese people and their wisdom? As if they are more trustworthy or wiser than other ethnicities?

    We’re all created equal, take orientalist exoticism bollocks like this elsewhere.

  • Steve Jackman

    In Japan’s case, it destroyed most of its WW2 documents. Care to guess why?

  • Shuami

    I have encountered characters like you plenty of times before–you can’t really provide any evidence or source to support your own argument, yet when others do, you would dismiss them as “biased, poorly-sourced nonsense”.
    Well, maybe you can be a little more specific as to WHY
    they are “biased” and HOW they are “poorly-sourced”?? I can claim you
    are a 4-legs 1-eye troll for that matter, and that “it’s what you are”, duh!!

    Similarly, just because something is “discussed extensively” does not imply that “it’s just biased nonsense”. It means it’s a highly contentious subject, which it is. But by no means is it an indication that “it’s just biased nonsense”. Plate tectonic theory was “discussed extensively”, but
    obviously, at least by now, it is NOT nonsense.

    It’s funny that you can without so much as a glance at Mr. Lohmeyer’s thesis and dismiss
    its 800+ references as (without) “any semblance of quality or
    accuracy”. How could have you reached such a conclusion without even a
    casual browse of it. Did you even download it?? It’s true that
    “Creationists, anti-vaccine advocates, racists, all of them publish
    papers with lots of references”, but you neglect to mention one
    thing–there are even more Darwinists, pro-vaccine advocates, and
    equal-right activists who’ve published rebuttals with scientific proof,
    research data, etc. to soundly defeat their claims. But you certainly
    have NOT done any of that to refute the arguments brought forward by the
    authors I mentioned. You simply repeat your assertion again and again,
    which certainly can’t win you any argument.