U.S. leader eyes place in history

Obama to call for big cuts in nuclear arms


U.S. leader Barack Obama will Wednesday propose major cuts in American and Russian nuclear arsenals, making a pitch for his own place in history in an evocative open-air speech during his first visit as president to Berlin.

Almost 50 years to the day since John Kennedy declared “Ich bin ein Berliner” and 26 years since Ronald Reagan exhorted Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev to “tear down this wall!” Obama will unveil plans for a one-third reduction in Cold War nuclear stocks.

He will also hold talks with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, with whom he usually has respectful relations, but who is pointedly demanding details on the exact extent of recently leaked U.S. surveillance programs.

Obama will use the speech at the Brandenburg Gate to propose cutting U.S. and Russian strategic nuclear warheads to around 1,000 each, and also seek cuts in tactical nuclear stocks in Europe.

“We will seek to negotiate these reductions with Russia to continue to move beyond Cold War nuclear postures,” a senior U.S. official said.

It remains unclear whether Russian President Vladimir Putin — with whom Obama held a frosty meeting on the sidelines of the Group of Eight summit in Northern Ireland on Monday — will agree to such bold cuts.

Russia has previously demanded changes to the U.S. missile defense system before agreeing to return to the nuclear agenda.

Obama will also commit to attending a nuclear security summit in The Hague next year, and to hosting his own version in 2016 in the final year of his term.

Obama inaugurated the first such summit, designed to ensure unsecured nuclear stocks do not fall into the hands of terrorists, in Washington in 2010 and went to a follow-up meeting in Seoul two years later.

His announcement on Wednesday is intended to ensure that his nuclear weapons agenda remains at the center of his foreign policy legacy, following the conclusion of the New Strategic Nuclear Arms Reduction Treaty with Russia during his first term.

Although he remains popular in Germany, Obama will struggle to meet the expectations he spun for himself as a presidential candidate, in a speech to 200,000 Berliners in 2008 that made him a political rock star in Europe.

Since that call for a joint U.S.-European bid to “remake the world” by battling terrorism, global warming, Middle East violence and poverty, Obama has been schooled in the power of the status quo at home and abroad to thwart change.

But frustration will not temper his rhetoric, according to U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes.

“Any time a U.S. president speaks in Berlin, it’s a powerful backdrop to our postwar history,” Rhodes said.

“This is a place where U.S. presidents have gone to talk about the role of the free world. With that historical backdrop . . . sometimes it’s easy to think that history is behind us, essentially. The Wall is down. There’s not a threat of global nuclear war. The threats that we do face are far more distant,” Rhodes said.

“The overarching point that he’s going to make is the exact same level of citizen and national activism that was characterized in the Kennedy speech and in the Cold War needs to be applied to the challenges we face now.”

In his meeting with Merkel, Obama is under intense pressure to explain the reach and scope of U.S. National Security Agency spy programs that vacuum up data from phone records and the Internet in the United States and abroad.

The programs, which have special resonance in a nation still pained by the communist Stasi secret police’s snooping operations, have triggered alarm across the political spectrum in Berlin.

“I will call for more transparency,” Merkel, who grew up in communist East Germany, said Monday, adding that Germans wanted to know if their online habits were being spied on by the NSA. “We have to be clear — what is being used, what is not being used,” she said.

Obama, who arrived in Berlin on Tuesday after the wrap-up of the G-8 summit, has said he welcomes public debate on the trade-offs inherent between protecting privacy and citizens from the threat of terrorism.

  • zer0_0zor0

    Any moves toward building a rapport with Putin toward preserving peace are welcome. Obama needs to assuage concerns over his recent capitulation, albeit reserved and understated, to provide arms to the rebels in Syria.

    Putin was the only world leader to stand up to Bush and put him in his place. I’d hate to see a second consecutive American president subjected to the same treatment.

    Obama is smarter than Bush, and I believe that he is not a war monger, but is faced with a plurality of difficult scenarios from which he has to extricate the USA against opposition from hawkish politicos like McCain, etc., who seek to gain political capital by portraying him as weak.