Hatoyama visits Crimea, met by pro-Russian official


Former Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama arrived Tuesday in Crimea despite stiff opposition from Tokyo to a trip that could be seen as legitimizing Moscow’s annexation of the Black Sea peninsula.

The government had urged Hatoyama not to visit the region, which was annexed by Russia about a year ago. Officials feared that if a former prime minister entered the territory with a Russian visa, it could conflict with Japan’s stance that Russia unilaterally took the territory from Ukraine in violation of international law.

But Hatoyama, who served as prime minister for just nine months from 2009 to 2010, paid no heed to Tokyo’s concerns, kicking off his three-day Crimea trip with a visit to the seaside city of Yalta, Russian news agency RIA Novosti reported.

“I possibly could in some way promote the development of cultural and humanitarian ties between Crimea and Japan,” the agency quoted Hatoyama as saying.

The former prime minister was set to give a speech to university students in Crimea on Thursday, RIA Novosti reported.

The Ukrainian province was annexed by Moscow on March 18 last year, triggering international condemnation.

Japanese officials fear Moscow could exploit his visit in its efforts to justify the annexation.

Earlier on Tuesday in Tokyo, Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida said the government would “continue to urge former Prime Minister Hatoyama” not to visit Crimea.

Yukio Edano, secretary-general of the Democratic Party of Japan, to which Hatoyama formerly belonged, said the former prime minister “can’t escape being criticized for being improvident” by making the trip.

Hatoyama, 68, was prime minister from September 2009 to June 2010 when the DPJ was in power.

Hatoyama told reporters in Moscow on Monday he wanted “to take a look at” whether the annexation was justified.

“Facts haven’t been delivered to Japan accurately. I would like to see myself how residents are feeling,” he said.

“An opinion poll showed that residents expressed their wish for annexation,” he said. “What’s most important in democracy is what local residents feel.”

Hatoyama said he held “various consultations with the Russian side” about his plan to visit the Crimea.

He said the trip may contribute to solving the dispute with Moscow over the group of small islands off Hokkaido that are controlled by Russia and claimed by Japan.

“If we are at loggerheads with Russia, it will be all the more difficult to get the Northern Territories back,” Hatoyama said, referring to the islands.

“The Northern Territories will be returned only when President (Vladimir) Putin is in power. In resolving the Northern Territories issue, we need to understand what Russia thinks about Crimea.”

He also questioned whether Japan’s participation in sanctions against Russia over its annexation of Crimea is appropriate.

“Japan should think hard whether imposing sanctions, just following European countries and the United States, is the right decision to make,” he said.

  • Jud Mag

    Hatoyama does not seem to know that the Northern Territories were populated by Ukrainians at the urging of the Soviet government after the take-over. Should there be a “democratic” vote, Hatoyama might be mighty surprised. He should know history and politics better.

  • Korey D

    It is important for all countries to make up their own minds (as well as people) instead of worrying what America or anyone else thinks. Doing the right thing instead of the expediate or politically correct thing will build a moral base for any country or person

  • drivin98

    baka baka

    Sadly, I doubt he was able to meet with the significant Tartar community to see what they thought of their new Russian overlords.

    • Alex Surname

      He will be able to meet with anyone he wishes, Russia is a free country.
      Russia has own Tatarstan republic as one of the federal subjects. It is also one of the most developed and wealthy territories of Russia. Crimean Tatars had no reason to feel anything positive towards Ukraine, even (much) less now. Almost half of Tatars, who comprise 15% of Crimea population, actually participated in the referendum.

  • Law

    I suggest you not to judge a country, if you have never been there personally. And please spell the name correctly – not “Tartars”, but “Tatars”. As an insider I can assure you that Tatars are much more positive towards Russians, than Ukrainians. Historically, they aren’t, but seeing how deep in “dermo” is Ukraine, they’d prefer to stay with Russians for now.

    If you are worried about human rights so much, why don’t you read a bit about a lovely resort, called “Guantanamo camp”, caring bombings of ancient civilizations of Middle East (Babylon=Iraq) and 36 kiloton messages of love and peace to Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    • drivin98

      Firstly, I didn’t misspell Tartars, “Alex Surname” did. Now, I certainly understand how viewing a place from a distance can never give a totally accurate picture. I was shocked at how much more interesting Florida is after I had a chance to spend some time there. Likewise, Japan. Still, I read a lot, have seen a number of documentaries and feel I have at least a feel for the region. Also, I have faith in the research done by Freedom House, and their assessment matches up with what I’ve taken from many other sources.

      Secondly, perhaps some Tartars might prefer Russia to Ukraine, I’m not there and can not interview each one. The coverage I have read suggest many are unhappy with how things turned out. Here’s an interesting piece for your perusal: http://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/tatars-resist-moscow-sourced-intimidation-in-crimea-1.2141866

      Finally, I am quite familiar with Guantanamo and am hugely disappointed that it was not shut down by this administration as it had promised. I think many crimes have taken place there that will go unpunished. I’ve always been opposed to the war in Iraq and think George Bush and his co-conspirators ought to be in prison. Additionally, I strongly oppose the mass bombings of civilian areas and am sickened by the use of nuclear weapons at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as well as the firebombing of Tokyo and Dresden, which actually produced more casualties than the nuclear attacks.

      I reserve the right to speak out against any government that tramples human rights.

      In addendum, just so we understand each other a bit more, I am not totally opposed to the concept of the Crimean split from Ukraine. However, such a move should take place only after the citizens of a region are given a reasonable amount of time to weigh and consider their future. Not under conditions of intimidation, or during an occupation by foreign troops and not in a reaction to one singular event.

      Peoples everywhere should have the right of self determination, but the political process has to be transparent and fair, not hurried, with heavy manipulation from an outside government.