MOX imports have cost at least ¥99.4 billion, much higher than uranium fuel

JIJI

Five nuclear plant operators have spent at least ¥99.4 billion on imports of plutonium-containing mixed oxide (MOX) fuel since it was first shipped to Japan in 1999, Jiji Press learned on Saturday.

Some of the imports cost nine times more than conventional uranium fuel. The MOX expenses are partly reflected in monthly electricity bills.

The MOX fuel, a mixture of plutonium extracted from spent nuclear fuel and uranium, is a core component of Japan’s nuclear fuel cycle. But the use of the fuel has drawn criticism for its high costs.

Japanese power companies that use or plan to use the MOX fuel commission the fuel’s production from companies in France and elsewhere.

The five that imported MOX fuel are Tokyo Electric Power Co., Chubu Electric Power Co., Kansai Electric Power Co., Shikoku Electric Power Co. and Kyushu Electric Power Co., according to the Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan.

Of the five, Kansai Electric, Shikoku Electric and Kyushu Electric have revised their monthly power rates to reflect the cost of using MOX fuel.

Since 1999, MOX fuel has been shipped to six of the five companies’ nuclear power stations. Trade statistics compiled by the Finance Ministry and other data show that the imports since that time have totaled ¥99.437 billion, including the costs of transportation and insurance.

In June 2013, Kansai Electric imported 20 units of MOX fuel assemblies from France for ¥18.514 billion for use at the No. 3 and No. 4 reactors at the Takahama power station in Fukui Prefecture.

The average cost per unit stood at ¥925 million, compared with the average of around ¥103 million for 60 units of conventional uranium fuel that Kansai Electric imported from the United States between October and November that year, also for use at the two reactors.

All five power companies declined to disclose MOX fuel costs, citing confidentiality of MOX fuel procurement contracts.

Japanese power companies use MOX fuel by mixing it with conventional uranium fuel. The share of the MOX fuel in the total fuel used has been limited to around 30 percent so far. The Oma nuclear power station of the Electric Power Development Co. (J-Power), which is under construction, will be the first one that will rely entirely on MOX fuel.

The use of MOX fuel in Japan is being halted because all commercial reactors still remain idle nearly four years after the nuclear disaster at Tepco’s Fukushima No. 1 power station began in March 2011. The federation planned to have MOX fuel used at 16 to 18 reactors across Japan by fiscal 2015, but the plan was put off.

  • Tom Clements

    It’s the same story in the US, which continues to pursue construction of a $12.7-billion MOX plant at the US DOE’s Savannah River Site (SRS) in South Carolina. Any MOX that the SRS plant might one day produce would be far more expensive than uranium fuel and no utilities are expressing interest in its use in their nuclear reactors. Those utilities would have to be paid a large amount of taxpayer funds to use a product they don’t want. The life-cycle cost of the US MOX program is well over $30 billion, which makes the project unsustainable and underscores that plutonium in the US (and elsewhere in the world) should be managed as a waste with a high negative value). — Tom Clements, Savannah River Site Watch, Columbia, South Carolina, USA

  • PacE

    not to mention that plutonium in MOX can blow up in a type of nuclear explosion such at Fukushima 3,

    The science behind that statement is here

    http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2013/12/fukushima-was-nuclear-explosion-here-is.html

  • Sam Gilman

    That’s another anti-nuclearist climate change denier. They do seem to increasing amongst the anti-nuclear population.