/

Is new China the old Japan?

by Curtis S. Chin

In the context of the continued economic and military rise of China, an old Japanese propaganda poster from the Philippines now on display at a small but powerful exhibition in New York City, marking the 75th anniversary of the outbreak of World War II, is striking.

Japan’s wartime flag as well as those of the people, nations and admittedly colonies that Imperial Japan sought to conquer are visible in the exhibit.

This particular poster depicts parts of East and Southeast Asia, and in English, reads: “December 8th. The third anniversary of Greater East Asia War to defend Asia for and by the Asiatics. Japan’s victory is the Philippines Triumph.”

Dec. 8 was the date from Asia’s side of the dateline of Japan’s attack on U.S. forces at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.

On display at the Grolier Club, a New York institution dedicated to appreciation of books and prints, the poster is one of many items that can be viewed until Aug. 2 in “The Power of Words and Images in a World at War.”

Drawn from the collection of the Museum of World War II in Boston, the exhibition focuses on the iconic posters, broadsides, books and periodicals that influenced millions in the course of the “last great worldwide conflict.”

Yet, in touring the exhibition of old words and images, a very modern, troubling question comes to mind: Does “New China” equal “Old Japan”?

Or more pointedly, does China risk becoming the Japan of some seven decades past, namely a rising nation that sparks conflict and then war under the guise of “Asia for Asians”?

Trouble continues to brew in the East China and South China seas, where an increasingly assertive China is seen, fairly or not, by many of its neighbors as a schoolyard bully, taking by force — one “salami slice” of territory at a time — what it could not through diplomacy.

The stationing of a massive floating deep-water oil rig by China into waters also claimed by Vietnam has been the latest flash point and tensions continue to escalate. Riots flared in Vietnam against factories and other interests perceived as being linked to China, and video footage of what seems to be a massive Chinese ship ramming and sinking a much smaller Vietnamese fishing boat has hit the Internet.

The last few months, let alone years, are no model for a way forward when it comes to dispute resolution.

Cases in point: In November of last year, China unilaterally announced an expanded air defense zone encompassing airspace that overlapped with claims by Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.

And in the last few months, Chinese military planes have come dangerously close to those of the United States and Japan. China, Taiwan and Japan also all claim the Senkaku Islands, known as the Diaoyu Islands by the Chinese.

To the south, in an area that China claims is its own, within a “nine-dash line” skirting the coasts of several Southeast Asian nation, Chinese ships patrol a reef still claimed by and known by the Philippines as the Scarborough Shoal.

So far, China — in its rhetoric and its efforts to change the status quo — is losing the external public relations war even as its actions no doubt may play well at home amidst a slowing economy and growing concerns over pollution and corruption.

Pointedly, at the recent Conference on Interaction and Confidence Building Measures in Asia summit in Shanghai, Chinese President Xi Jinping unveiled a new “Asian Security concept,” which in essence called for Asian security to be left to Asians. China has indeed “stood up,” and a century of “humiliation” at the hands of Western powers is long over, as China, the second-largest economy in the world, resumes its “rightful” place in the world order.

Flash back to the 1930s and 1940s as Imperial Japan’s propaganda machine exhorted Asians to control their own destinies and throw aside the yoke of Western colonial rule. Asia for Asians was the mantra.

And better yet, Japan’s leaders argued, come join Japan in a “Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere,” where all would benefit as Japan took its rightful leadership role in the region.

Well, we all know how well that played out, as Japan’s vision of Asia for Asians led that nation and much of the Asia-Pacific region down a path to destruction. From the ashes of World War II and the Korean and Vietnam wars that followed, a new paradigm evolved with the U.S. helping guarantee a Pacific peace that has allowed Asia to prosper and ironically China to rise.

That defense status quo is now being challenged by China even as the U.S. and Japan seek to reaffirm it.

At the Asia Security Summit held recently in Singapore, also known as the Shangri-La Dialogue, U.S. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and Japan Prime Minister Shinzo Abe both raised China’s ire with statements challenging China’s recent territorial moves.

The U.S. “will not look the other way when fundamental principles of the international order are being challenged,” Hagel said. “We firmly oppose any nation’s use of intimidation, coercion or the threat of force to assert [its] claims.”

Abe, in his keynote address, announced Japan’s intention to play a greater role in regional security, in ensuring open skies and sea lanes, and in supporting Southeast Asian nations in territorial disputes with China.

Sadly there is no third party — no respected principal in the schoolyard — to intervene, and in a face-saving move make clear that all sides need to let cooler heads prevail.

China should pull back its oil rig. The 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations must work together now, and a clear code of conduct be established in the South China Sea even as territorial claims remain unresolved.

And every nation — Japan, China and the U.S. included — should treat each other with respect.

With tensions mounting, it is time for all players to take a step back from the brink of even greater conflict and commit to engagement, cooperation and a peaceful resolution to disputes.

The power of words and images — a force during wartime — can also be a force during times of (relative) peace. This will be essential if this century is to be one of shared peace and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region, some 7½ decades since the start of World War II.

Curtis S. Chin, a former U.S. ambassador to the Asian Development Bank (under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama), is managing director of advisory firm RiverPeak Group, LLC. On Twitter: @CurtisSChin

  • Demosthenes

    I think this article definitely raises the fundamental question about China that we should be asking ourselves. But, when you think about it, if China really is wanting to become top dog in the region, isn’t it just easier to bare in mind that perhaps things in Asia are just going back to how they were in ancient times? China becoming the dominant force in Asia isn’t really a new story, it’s more of a return to the way things used to be traditionally. We tend to think of the Asia Pacific region as being dominated by Western influences, but that’s only because that’s how things have been over the spans of our lifetimes. I’m just hoping that, if it is going that direction, that China does it without any wars or other stupid acts of aggression. Let’s hope they’re fans of Sun Tzu’s suggestion “to win without battle is the highest form of victory.”

    • CaptainAsia

      Don’t you think China should find the jade rabbit first before we tick any boxes?

  • http://www.sheldonthinks.com/ Andrew Sheldon

    The problem of course is that the West really hasn’t opened up China to Western ideas or values. Its been a thoroughly materialists transformation. The implication is clear; morally perverted liberals and conservatives have ‘empowered China’, and in so doing failed to avert the prospects for conflict. We need libertarianism in the West before we can expect any values transformation in China; but also to strengthen the capacity of the West to defend itself. A strong economy is the basis for military defence; but before that, one’s needs coherent values. Conservatives and liberals have just ignored the issue…remaining ambiguously ‘apprehensive’.