Reactor in Kagoshima poised for restart despite public opposition


Staff Writer

Kyushu Electric Power Co. said Monday it will restart the No. 1 reactor at its Sendai nuclear plant on Tuesday, marking the country’s first long-term return to nuclear power since the Fukushima crisis.

The reactor, in Satsumasendai, Kagoshima Prefecture, will be the first to go live under new safety standards that were put in place in 2013. The standards were drawn up after the meltdowns at the Fukushima No. 1 power plant in March 2011.

The restart, strongly pushed by the pro-business administration of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, will deal a tough blow to anti-nuclear activists and citizens who have been calling for abolition of all nuclear power plants.

Advocates of the restart include the prefectural government as well as residents of Satsumasendai who appreciate the impact of nuclear-power related subsidies on public works projects and the effect the plant has on local service industries.

Meanwhile, the Abe Cabinet risks losing popularity among voters. A poll by the Mainichi Shimbun on Saturday and Sunday found that 57 percent of people are opposed to reactivating the Sendai plant, while 30 percent support it. The survey polled 1,015 respondents nationwide.

Abe has maintained that utility companies, not the central government, should decide whether to restart reactors if the Nuclear Regulation Authority declares them safe under new inspection standards.

But at the same time his administration has been promoting the reactivation of suspended commercial reactors, citing the huge cost of importing fossil fuels for thermal power plants.

Tuesday’s restart would come despite local worries that Kyushu Electric Power and local politicians and businesses have been pushing for it without addressing what would happen in the event of an emergency.

A protest rally in front of the plant Monday drew former Prime Minister Naoto Kan, who was in office at the time of the events of March 11, 2011.

With the exception of Kansai Electric Power Co.’s Oi No. 3 and 4 reactors in Fukui Prefecture, which were restarted in summer 2012 under the old safety measures and ran until early autumn 2013, all of Japan’s 43 remaining operable nuclear reactors have been shut down since the Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami, and subsequent meltdowns in Fukushima.

“Like Tepco and Fukushima at that time, Kyushu Electric will not take responsibility for evacuation in case of an emergency,” Kan told the rally. “Under current laws, neither Tepco nor Kyushu Electric have responsibility to ensure the safety of residents.”

Local governments hosting nuclear plants are required to draw up evacuation plans for those living within 30 km of the site.

But nuclear plants like Sendai are often located in isolated areas along a coast, where access roads are sometimes few and where many local residents are elderly and would require special care and assistance.

“The plans Kagoshima Prefecture has drawn up are unrealistic,” said Katsuhiro Inoue, a member of the Satsumasendai Municipal Assembly from the Japan Communist Party.

“They assume the main access road closest to the plant will be usable in the event of accident, and they don’t answer basic questions of how long it might take to move those who are elderly outside the 30-km radius of the plant, or what might happen to people who live more than 30 km away and try to evacuate,” Inoue said.

In May 2014, the prefecture calculated how long it would take to evacuate the nearly 215,000 people who live in Satsumasendai and nine other towns within 30 km of the plant.

In the best case scenario, officials estimated it would take almost 10 hours to evacuate 90 percent of the population.

In the worst case, the prefecture concluded, it could take almost 29 hours.

  • DrHanibalLecter

    If my memory serves me well, then Japan is a representative democracy?
    When I studied politics in (a european) University, I learned, that this means the people choose their leader in a free democratic election, who then decides in their name.
    Surely the people of Japan know what kind of thinking the Abe name has been standing for since several generations, and new what they were doing when they not just elected, but re-elected him?

    Are you suggesting that the people of Japan are idiots?
    The voting numbers in Sendai are no different than in the rest of country…

    • keratomileusis

      No no no! You’ve forgotten the “Golden Rule” my dear. Whoever has the gold, makes the rules.” Democracy is an illusion…

  • Oliver_K_Manuel

    Absolute honesty is probably the only way to resolve this debate.

    • Oliver_K_Manuel

      As noted yesterday in a comment on “Nagasaki bombing remembered, . . .” the veracity of official information about nuclear interactions was apparently compromised after WWII to obscure NEUTRON REPULSION in cores of:

      1. Heavy atoms like Uranium
      2. Some planets like Jupiter
      3. Ordinary stars like the Sun
      4. Galaxies like the Milky Way
      5. The now expanding Universe

      After WWII, physics textbooks replaced Aston’s valid definition of nuclear stability, based on values of Aston’s nuclear packing fraction with Weizsacker’s invalid definition of nuclear stability, based on values of Weizsacker’s nuclear binding energy.

      Dr. Carl von Weizsacker’s nuclear binding energy equation
      _ a.) Exaggerates proton-proton repulsion, and
      _ b.) Underestimates neutron-neutron repulsion.

      Dr. Paul Kazuo Kuroda reports in his autobiography Nobel Laureate Francis W. Aston lectured on nuclear energy and nuclear packing fractions at the Imperial University of Tokyo on 13 June 1936. A physicist in the audience immediately asked, “What is nuclear packing fraction?”

      It may be safe to use nuclear energy if nuclear physicists and engineers explain why Aston’s values of nuclear packing fraction always predict nuclear stability, but Weizsacker’s values of nuclear binding energy falsely predict greater stability for radioactive neutron-rich atoms than for stable proton-rich atoms, e.g.,
      _ c.) Radioactive tritium (H-3) versus stable He-3
      _ d.) Radioactive carbon-14 (C-14) versus stable N-14
      etc., etc.

  • donutpink

    The restart of nuclear power plants, the construction of new American military bases in Okinawa, the passing of the security bills in the lower house are all issues that the people of Japan stand against.

    Japan’s economy in deflation, highest GDP-to-debt ratio in the world, decrease in wages, increase of poverty and childhood poverty, an aging society. All problems that people of Japan cannot ignore.

    • Oliver_K_Manuel

      The people of Japan should join the efforts of the late Professor Paul Kazuo Kuroda (Nuclear Geochemist at the Imperial University of Tokyo during WWII) for truth about nuclear energy and the birth of the Solar System five billion years (5 Ga) ago when the Sun exploded.

  • Oliver_K_Manuel

    The problem is just this: Scientific and technical information on nuclear physics and engineering were compromised after WWII to prevent public knowledge of the source of energy in atomic bombs, e.g.,

    1. Each neutron repels, rather than attracts, other neutrons.
    2. Weizsacker’s nuclear binding energy concept is flawed.
    3. Neutron repulsion causes neutron emission and fission.
    4. Stars & reactors generate hydrogen by neutron decay.
    5.The Standard Nuclear and Solar Models are incorrect.

    • Oliver_K_Manuel

      To safely harvest nuclear energy will require a complete rebuilding of post-WWII government science from the Orwellian Ministry of Consensus Science (UN)Truths after nations and national academies of science were united on 24 October 1945.

      To hide neutron repulsion, veracity was compromised in these major fields: Astronomy, astrophysics, climatology, cosmology, geology, nuclear, particle, planetary, solar, space, and theoretical physics