/

Document shows Tepco was aware of need for tsunami measures in 2008: lawyers

Kyodo

Tokyo Electric Power Co. was aware of the need to take anti-tsunami measures at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant before the 2011 crisis, contrary to its claims regarding such hazards there, lawyers for plaintiffs in a damages suit said Thursday.

Yuichi Kaido, one of the lawyers, told the Tokyo District Court that an internal Tepco document dated 2008 shows the company “had clearly recognized as of that year that measures against tsunami were inevitable, contradicting the company’s explanations so far.”

The operator of the radiation-leaking plant crippled by the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami has claimed during the trial and in other venues that it was not able to predict the massive tsunami.

The lawsuit was filed in March 2012 by more than 40 Tepco shareholders seeking to have former and current company directors pay around ¥5.5 trillion in damages to the company for their failure to prevent the crisis.

Tepco has demanded the claim be dismissed.

The internal document, which was compiled for a company meeting held at Fukushima No. 1 in 2008, says measures against tsunami hazards are “inevitable as we cannot help but expect bigger tsunami than currently projected” given the opinions of academics and the government, the lawyers said.

According to a report compiled in 2012 by a Diet-appointed panel that investigated the Fukushima nuclear disaster, Tepco projected in June 2008 that after an earthquake the plant could be hit by 15.7-meter waves. The internal document was produced three months after that, but the utility did not take specific measures against tsunami.

The document is another piece of evidence supporting the investigative panel’s report that called the world’s worst nuclear crisis since Chernobyl in 1986 a “clearly man-made disaster” caused by the company.

The lawyers claimed that Tepco apparently tried to avoid spending massive amounts of money on boosting the plant’s preparedness against disasters.

Fukushima No. 1 lost nearly all of its power sources and consequently the ability to cool its reactors after it was hit by the magnitude-9.0 earthquake and huge tsunami on March 11, 2011.

Reactors 1, 2 and 3 suffered core meltdowns while a hydrogen explosion rocked the building housing the No. 4 unit.

  • Liars N. Fools

    But TEPCO is essentially liability free and hence accountability free because the government is protecting it now from financial complex and using its corporate being to pay what compensation it will while limiting government liability.

  • Starviking

    And once again, we have an utter lack of regard for the 20,000-odd people who lost their lives on the 11th of March 2011.

    Let’s look at one quote:

    The internal document, which was compiled for a company meeting held at Fukushima No. 1 in 2008, says measures against tsunami hazards are “inevitable as we cannot help but expect bigger tsunami than currently projected” given the opinions of academics and the government, the lawyers said.

    Now the lawyers believe this is true. I think it says a lot about the lawyers that they don’t even think that, “given the opinions of academics and the government”, someone should have warned the people of Tohoku about a possible large tsunami?

    Maybe lawyers are just interested in easy targets?

    • JenniWest

      TEPCO was given time to make the recommended changes. They waited too long. (I think their psychics must have been off that week.)

      But TEPCO is not responsible for the people who lost their lives from the tsunami. That data was available and was not only known by TEPCO. As no one lost their lives from actual radiation contamination and will not, according to the math and to experts who are unconnected to TEPCO, I’m not sure what your post implies.

      • Starviking

        My post illuminates a strange double-standard on assigning responsibilities for damage and casualties in the events of the 11th of March 2011:

        Tepco. Directly responsible for zero deaths. Might have known/suspected/started planning for a higher tsunami. Multiple investigations. Vilified in the media.

        Various government agencies. Possibly directly responsible for 20,000 deaths. If subject to the same evidentiary standards as TEPCO, might have known/suspected/started planning for a higher tsunami. No investigations. Not vilified in the media.

      • JenniWest

        That’s par for the course, sadly, when the word “nuclear” anything is in a headline.

  • helenrberrios23

    Do you want to earn online from comfort of your house completing simple jobs on your computer for three to five hrs every day, earn 85 bucks an hour and get a paycheck at the end of every week and decide for your own when to work and for how long?

    Then see this—>

  • Starviking

    Leslie’s work is a great boon to the fact-focused individual.