Poll: 57.9% say Japan’s Middle East aid should be nonmilitary


A majority of Japanese think the government’s aid for Middle Eastern countries fighting the Islamic State group should be limited to nonmilitary support, a Kyodo News poll showed Saturday.

The nationwide survey conducted via telephone on Friday and Saturday showed 57.9 percent of the respondents said Japan’s support should be nonmilitary, while 16.6 percent said it should include logistical support to the U.S.-led coalition fighting the Islamic State group.

The approval rating for Abe’s Cabinet stood at 54.2 percent, up 1.4 percentage points from the previous survey on Jan. 25.

The survey comes a week after Islamic State militants posted an online video showing the group had killed a Japanese hostage. The group criticized Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who earlier had pledged $200 million in humanitarian aid for countries fighting the Islamic State group.

The Abe government has dismissed the possibility that Japanese troops will offer logistical support.

Some 11.2 percent in the survey said Japan should provide financial aid for the coalition’s military operations against Islamic State militants, with 2.8 percent supporting Japan’s direct involvement in such attacks.

As for the planned $200 million in aid, 53.8 percent said it should be provided as announced, with 18.0 percent saying the amount should be reduced, and 14.6 percent calling for the aid to be canceled.

Some 60.8 percent supported the Abe government’s handling of the hostage crisis, little changed from 60.6 percent in the previous survey.

The hostage crisis began with the release of a video on Jan. 20 in which the militant group threatened to kill two Japanese hostages unless Tokyo paid $200 million in ransom within 72 hours. On Jan. 24, an image was posted online appearing to show that one of the hostages had been killed.

By political party, Abe’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party was supported by 39.0 percent, down from 39.6 percent in the last survey, while 7.4 percent backed the main opposition Democratic Party of Japan, down from 8.1 percent. A total of 38.2 percent said they did not support any particular party.

The survey was conducted by randomly calling selected households. It contacted 1,438 households with eligible voters, and got valid responses from 1,015 people.

  • Facebook User

    The US military create most of these problems then they go in acting like heros but are really raping and killing!
    It’s best to avoid the US military!
    Www theusmarinesrape com

  • timefox

    There are a lot of respectable Japanese. I was relieved.

  • Charles Burns

    Maybe Japan should bake cupcakes for ISIS fundraising or invite them to include Japan’s territory as part of its Caliphate. Weak minded saps.

    • Gordon Graham

      Did you ever answer that question “Have you ever served in combat”…I was curious also

  • jr_hkkdo

    I don’t think Japan can remain neutral in this war. They must take a side. Either the islamo-fascist side (the barbarians)…OR the side of civilized nations. Why? because ISIS/ISIL/Al Qaeda will not permit anyone to be neutral eventually. Everyone (in the world) will have to choose Islam or not. If they choose not to be Islamic (Muslim) then they are the enemy of Islam and will be targeted as such. By offering only non-military aid, Japan is trying to be neutral. I don’t think that is a real option for Japan.

    • kension86

      “By offering only non-military aid, Japan is trying to be neutral. I don’t think that is a real option for Japan.”

      No, that’s not neutral at all. Being neutral means no aids at all.

      Personally, I think Japan should either involve directly to solve the mess once for all, or save the money for its own economy. The middle-ground “freebies” option seems kinda pointless to me.

      • jr_hkkdo

        I agree with you…but I think maybe Japan is trying to be neutral as they have so often in the past. Sometimes it’s OK, but in this case, the Islamo fascists will not let them. One is either for them or one is their enemy – no in-between. So yes, the non-military aid is virtually pointless, except perhaps to soothe the conscience of the Japanese. Non-military aid has little chance of getting to the people needing it until ISIS is destroyed.

    • Charles Burns

      By offering non-military aid, Japan is trying to do what it always tries to do – just the bare minimum so other countries can’t accuse it of doing nothing, but not enough that the narrow minded folks within its walls start complaining about war.

      I agree full heartedly that countries need to decide whether they are with the terrorists or against them. The countries who sit on their hands and do nothing should receive no aid from the USA whatsoever. Why should we be helping foreign countries with various forms of support and funding, yet they sit idly by and watch as ew do all the heavy lifting.

      You have hostages being held by ISIS – it’s YOUR problem. DOn’t look to us to solve the world’s problems.