NEW YORK – At the main entrance of the Nazi camp at Auschwitz one could read: “Arbeit macht frei” (“Work makes you free”). The current trial of Reinhold Hanning, 94, a former SS guard at the camp, brings to mind one of the saddest ironies in that most tragic place. He is being tried in the court city of Detmold, in western Germany, for his complicity in the death of 170,000 people, when he was just over 20 years old. Hanning is not charged with having directly participated in the killings in the camp; prosecutors accuse him of facilitating the murders in his capacity as a guard.
Hanning had been urged by his stepmother to join the SS. He was sent to France and then to the eastern front. After he was injured in Kiev, and having been rejected twice in his request to rejoin the front, he was sent as an internal service officer to Auschwitz, also known as Auschwitz-Birkenau, one of the most infamous death camps constructed by the Nazis.
Concentration camps had existed in Germany since 1933, as detention centers for Jews, political prisoners and others perceived as enemies of the Nazi state. Death camps, however, were built for the sole purpose of killing Jews and others the Nazis deemed as “undesirables.” They included artists, educators, homosexuals, communists, Gypsies and the mentally or physically disabled considered unfit for survival in Nazi Germany.
Auschwitz had started its operations in 1940 and its first commandant was Rudolf Hess, who had previously helped run the Sachsenhausen concentration camp in Oranienburg, Germany. When the Soviet army entered Krakow in 1945, the Germans ordered that the camp be abandoned. It was the end of an inconceivable cycle of death. Mounds of corpses, hundreds of thousands of pieces of clothing, and seven tons of human hair littered the camp.
It is estimated that between 1.1 million and 1.5 million people, the vast majority of them Jews, died in that inferno. More people died in that camp than the British and the Americans lost in the course of the war. Physically, Auschwitz began in 1940 and ended in 1945. Morally, however, it did not.
It is in this context that Hanning’s actions took place. “People were shot, gassed and burned. I could see how corpses were taken back and forth or moved out,” Hanning admitted to the court. While seated in a wheelchair, he said that he regretted being part of a “criminal organization” that had killed so many and caused so much suffering. “I’m ashamed that I knowingly let injustice happen and did nothing to oppose it,” he said, his voice broken by emotion.
If it weren’t so tragic, his testimony could be moving. In a statement read by his lawyer he said: “I have remained silent for a long time. I have remained silent all my life. I’ve tried to repress this period for my whole life. Auschwitz was a nightmare; I wish I had never been there. … I could smell burning bodies; I knew corpses were being burned.”
Auschwitz survivor Leon Schwarzbaum, who lost 35 members of his family in that camp, gave evidence in the trial against Hanning. He said that he remained haunted by his experiences in the camp and described Hanning as “cruel and sadistic.” “The older I get, the more time I have to think about what happened,” Schwarzbaum said. “I am nearly 95 years old and I still often have nightmares about this.”
But the most remarkable part of Schwarzbaum’s testimony is when he declared before entering the court: “I’ll look into his eyes and see if he is honest, because the truth is what is most important. I don’t want revenge; I don’t want him tormented in prison. He is just an old man like me.”
Having lived through the loss of three of my wife’s young cousins, who were murdered by the Argentine military during the 1970s (we were never able to learn the exact date), I couldn’t but marvel at his words. That despite all his personal suffering, Schwarzbaum would put truth and justice before his desire for revenge was for me Auschwitz’s greatest lesson.
Dr. Cesar Chelala is a winner of an Overseas Press Club of America and two national journalism awards from Argentina.
In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.