In reply to Victoria Miroshnik’s Oct. 24 letter, “Future of liberal arts education,” generally her observations are correct, although a further comment is required. As a tutor in liberal arts studies with 20-plus years as such, I should state that yes, sometimes, when pressed for time or wishing to get things straight, one turns to Wikipedia, which is a godsend as a resource. Obviously, as Miroshnik referred to it too, it is meeting its goals. It should be recognized that Wikipedia is a product of the liberal arts mindset, a very good example and deserving of the donations it receives.
To the assertion that “In Japan private universities … teaching liberal arts are in great danger of financial collapse,” I can offer a contradiction. Presently I tutor at such an institution in Japan, one that is based on the traditional liberal arts model. Far from struggling to survive, it seems to be going from strength to strength as a new campus, a faculty of law, was opened last April.
However, it is true that “liberal arts” courses today are a mishmash of competing disciplines and ideologies. It is no wonder that students are confused, disillusioned and have lost interest in the liberal arts — generally speaking.
The course that I tutor is “Neo-Liberal Arts” studies for students of English as a foreign language, but also includes a mandatory course for students of art history and design. This course is solidly based on the classical trivium and Aristotle, the ethics, prior analytics and rhetoric. However, it has been expanded to a “meta-trivium” with regards to topics, etc.
A recent survey I did of 120 first-year students asked a simple question: “Why do we study what we study?” About 40 percent of students mentioned concerns over jobs and their future. Around 58 percent said that they wanted to develop their character so as to be a good parent, or to make the most of their lives. Of this group, 15 percent stated that they enjoyed studying and wished to study forever. Those concerned about jobs also stated that they needed knowledge and experience so as to have something to offer a prospective employer.
In sum, my only difficulties are in trying to keep up with over-productive students, but if it just comes down to jobs, well yes, I am now defending my job.
The opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are the writer’s own and do not necessarily reflect the policies of The Japan Times.
In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.