Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte signed a contentious anti-terrorism bill into law Friday that critics fear will be used to silence dissent and give the government a new weapon to target opponents.

The legislation, which was approved by Congress last month and has been criticized by rights groups, enables Duterte to appoint a council that could order warrantless arrests of people it deems are terrorists.

It also allows for weeks of detention without charge, which the government argues is necessary to combat long-running communist and Islamist insurgencies.

“The signing of the… law demonstrates our serious commitment to stamp out terrorism, which has long plagued the country and has caused unimaginable grief and horror to many of our people,” Duterte’s spokesman Harry Roque said.

But activists say the definition of terrorism in the legislation is vague and could strengthen Duterte’s campaign against critics. Some are already serving prison sentences or facing jail time after attacking his policies including his drug war that has killed thousands.

“Under Duterte’s presidency, even the mildest government critics can be labelled terrorists,” Amnesty International’s Asia director Nicholas Bequelin said.

“This administration has effectively crafted a new weapon to brand and hound any perceived enemies of the state,” he added.

“In the prevailing climate of impunity, a law so vague on the definition of ‘terrorism’ can only worsen attacks against human rights defenders.”

The law defines terrorism as intending to cause death or injury, damage government or private property or use weapons of mass destruction to “spread a message of fear” or intimidate the government.

Suspects could be held up to 24 days without charge, which opponents allege violates a three-day limit set by the Philippine Constitution.

Critics allege the legislation also strips away old safeguards, such as penalties against law enforcers for wrongful detention of suspects.

“By signing the anti-terrorism bill into law, President Duterte has pushed Philippines democracy into an abyss,” said Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director for Human Rights Watch.

“The law threatens to significantly worsen the human rights situation in the Philippines, which has nosedived since the catastrophic ‘war on drugs’ began four years ago,” Robertson added.

In a report last month, the U.N. human rights office said at least 8,663 people have been killed in the drug war with “near impunity” for offenders.

Government officials say alarm about the law is overblown, citing provisions that exempt “advocacy, protest, dissent, stoppage of work… not intended to cause death or serious physical harm”.

Roque said Duterte signed the bill without making any changes.

Since its passage through Congress, prominent Philippine business leaders, Muslims in the Catholic-majority country, and U.N. human rights chief Michelle Bachelet have lobbied Duterte to veto the bill.

In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.