SEOUL – In a move likely watched closely by Japan, the U.S. military has begun issuing furlough warnings to almost 9,000 civilian South Korean employees as Washington and Seoul remain at loggerheads over President Donald Trump’s demand that its ally pay more for its hosting of American troops.
The notices inform workers at American military facilities in South Korea that they potentially face administrative furloughs as of April 1, according to a statement issued Wednesday by U.S. Forces Korea.
The two sides remain deadlocked, although U.S. officials have indicated they have backed off Trump’s initial demand that South Korea pay about $5 billion a year for U.S. forces stationed there — more than five times the $900 million in a stopgap one-year agreement that expired on Dec. 31. South Korea has said there is quite “a big difference in principle” between the two sides.
“Without the Republic of Korea’s continued commitment to share the cost of employing our Korean National workforce, USFK will soon exhaust program funds available to pay their salaries and wages,” the notice said.
Trump, who fancies himself a deal-maker, has repeatedly called for allies to shoulder more of the costs of their partnerships with the United States. Japan — despite Trump’s golf-buddy relationship with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe — is no exception.
For Tokyo, Washington’s ongoing cost-sharing talks with Seoul, and their ultimate result, are likely to have a significant impact on Japan’s potentially contentious negotiations with the White House on a bilateral Special Measures Agreement for hosting American troops that will expire in 2021.
Trump’s push for South Korea to contribute much more money to its SMA has put the alliance under strain at a time when North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s regime has said it would no longer be bound by its previous promise to halt testing of nuclear weapons and long-range ballistic missiles.
The union for the South Korean workers has said that operations at the bases would be completely paralyzed if there were massive furloughs.
Workers to be directly affected by such notices have offered to work without pay out of concern over how the situation could harm South Korea’s national defense, according to Son Gi-o, a representative of the U.S. Forces Korea Korean Employees Union, who called for a deal to be reached soon.
“You can’t put a pause in defending your own country,” Son said in an interview, adding that U.S. government officials “wouldn’t have made such a decision if it had a direct impact on a military base in their own land.”
John Rood, U.S. undersecretary for defense for policy, told the House Armed Services Committee that he expected the alliance between the two countries to remain firm despite the differences in funding and said the South Korean negotiators were “no pushovers.”
“We have to recommit ourselves to maintaining the ironclad nature of that alliance and try to manage that in a way where we can steer this to a successful conclusion,” Rood said.
Committee Chairman Adam Smith, a Democrat, said he worried that the Trump administration’s approach “could potentially jeopardize our relationship with South Korea.”
People familiar with the discussions say American negotiators have shifted their position as they seek to offer a justification for a far bigger price tag.
After initially suggesting South Korea could make more purchases of U.S. defense equipment, the Trump administration is now focused on other elements, such as asking the country to pay more for temporary troop rotations. Another demand is for South Korea to spend more on capabilities that would allow it to take full operational control of joint forces in wartime.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in is facing parliamentary elections in April and is wary of the political fallout if he agrees to a hefty increase, which has little support in his camp and among his country’s general public. South Korea decided this month to send a naval unit to the Strait of Hormuz, answering a U.S. call for greater international security commitments in the region.
In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.