World / Science & Health

Do you consume a credit card's worth of plastic every week?


Researchers say people worldwide could be ingesting 5 grams of microscopic plastic particles every week — equivalent in weight to a credit card.

Coming mostly from tap water and especially bottled water, nearly invisible bits of polymer were also found in shellfish, beer and salt, scientists and the University of Newcastle in Australia reported.

The findings, drawn from 52 peer-reviewed studies, are the first to estimate the weight of plastics consumed by individual humans: about 250 grams (half a pound) over the course of a year.

Another study calculated that the average American eats and drinks about 45,000 plastic particles smaller than 130 microns annually, and breathes in roughly the same number.

“Not only are plastics polluting our oceans and waterways and killing marine life, it’s in all of us,” said Marco Lambertini, director-general of WWF International, which commissioned the report. “If we don’t want it in our bodies, we need to stop the millions of tons of plastic that continue leaking into nature every year.”

In the past two decades, the world has produced as much plastic as during the rest of history, and the industry is set to grow by 4 percent a year until 2025, according to a new report by Grand View Research.

More than 75 percent of all plastics wind up as waste.

A third of that — some 100 million tons — is dumped or leaches into nature, polluting land, rivers and oceans.

Based on current trends, the ocean will contain 1 metric ton of plastic for every 3 metric tons of fish by 2025, according to The New Plastics Economy report, published by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation.

Plastic particles have recently been found inside fish in the deepest recesses of the ocean, and blanketing the most pristine snow in the Pyrenees mountains between France and Spain.

The authors of Wednesday’s report were up-front about the limitations of their research, starting with the fact that little is known about health consequences.

Gaps in data were filled with assumptions and extrapolations that could be challenged, though the estimates, they insisted, were on the conservative side.

They invited other researchers to build on their conclusions.

“Developing a method of transforming counts of microplastic particles into masses will help determine the potential toxicological risks for humans,” said co-author Thava Palanisami, a microplastics expert at the University of Newcastle.

Some experts remain skeptical about long-term impact.

“Based on the evidence that is currently available, I do not think that health effects of microplastics are a major concern,” said Alastair Grant, a professor of ecology at the University of East Anglia.

But that doesn’t mean plastic isn’t a major problem, he added.

“What we do need is political and economic actions to reduce the amounts of plastic being disposed of into the environment and encourage recycling.”

Media and watchdog reports have recently uncovered numerous cases of plastic waste from rich countries sent for recycling in poorer ones being dumped or burned instead.

“This is likely to have much more serious health effects than a rather small number of plastic particles in food and water,” Grant said.

The WWF said only hard targets backed by binding national commitments could hope to stem the tide.

“The global goal must be to reduce plastic leakage into nature to zero,” Eirik Lindebjerg, WWF’s global plastics policy manager, said.

“We need a new, legally binding agreement to combat marine plastic pollution — it should be a standalone treaty like the Montreal Protocol or the Paris Agreement.”

“Zero plastics” does not mean no plastics used. But waste must be folded back into a circular economy, and plastics should no longer be made from fossil fuels, Lindebjerg added.