WASHINGTON – The citizenship hopes of 1.8 million immigrants brought illegally to the United States as children hung in the balance Monday as Congress launched debate on the hot-button issue, with President Donald Trump eager to “make a deal” on new legislation.
In offering a path to citizenship for the so-called Dreamers, Trump has exceeded the demands of opposition Democrats — but only in exchange for tough cutbacks on overall immigration and funding for a massive wall on the Mexican border.
His proposal will be front and center as senators from both sides of the aisle begin an unpredictable process that could yield a long-sought breakthrough on immigration, or end in failure — with hundreds of thousands of immigrants at risk of losing their legal protections early next month.
“We start very serious DACA talks today,” Trump said, referring to the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program that expires on March 5.
Trump scrapped the scheme last September and gave Congress six months to craft a permanent fix.
“I hope to be able to make a deal,” Trump said, adding the Republican Party would “love” to reach an agreement.
“If the Democrats want to make a deal, it’s really up to them.”
A group of conservative senators was to introduce a bill Monday that closely follows the proposals Trump made in January.
The Secure and Succeed Act offers a 10- to 12-year path to citizenship for the 1.8 million Dreamers.
But it will also end the popular “green card lottery,” a 28-year-old program to diversify immigrant arrivals, and sharply limit family-based immigration.
In addition, it will allocate $25 billion for tighter border security including the construction of a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border that Trump promised during his 2016 election campaign.
“This is the only bill that has a chance of becoming law, and that’s because it’s the only bill that will truly solve the underlying problem,” said Sen. Tom Cotton, a lead sponsor of the legislation.
“This bill is generous, humane, and responsible, and now we should send it to the president’s desk,” Cotton said in a statement.
The Senate’s focus on immigration begins on the day the White House unveiled Trump’s budget framework for 2019, which asks for increases in border security funding, including for additional agents, detention centers and high-tech equipment such as drones.
“Until the porous borders are closed to the criminals, terrorists, and gang members that exploit it, America remains at risk,” the White House said in the document.
Several Democrats have suggested Trump’s plan is dead on arrival, in large part because it would so dramatically curb legal immigration.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has pledged to oversee an open-ended process by which both sides will be allowed to introduce amendments on immigration.
“Whoever gets to 60 wins,” McConnell said last week, referring to the threshold for advancing most legislation in the 100-member chamber.
With the fate of the Dreamers in limbo, a bipartisan group of about 25 senators known as the “Common Sense Coalition” is trying to forge a compromise package.
The clock is ticking: nearly 700,000 Dreamers who are registered under DACA could begin losing protections from expulsion early next month.
The program’s March 5 expiration date is not set in stone, however; a San Francisco judge’s injunction has at least temporarily blocked removal of DACA protections ordered by Trump late last year.
Cotton’s bill could meet stiff resistance.
Democrats and some Republicans have opposed Trump’s hard-line stance, especially the restriction of family-based immigration to spouses and children, and massive funding for the border wall.
Trump’s Democratic opponents had originally pushed only for a permanent solution for the DACA registrants, in separate legislation.
By expanding the promise of citizenship to all 1.8 million DACA-eligible young immigrants — and tying it to immigration cutbacks — Trump has put the Democrats in a corner.
The president has blamed domestic terror attacks and violent crime on beneficiaries of the visa lottery and family-based “chain migration.”
Should an immigration compromise pass the Senate, its fate in the House would remain unclear, in part because some conservatives oppose pathways to citizenship for undocumented migrants.