SYDNEY – Officials in Australia and Japan on Monday expressed skepticism and confusion over a pledge by Prime Minister Tony Abbott to give an Australian state-owned shipbuilder the option to tender for a major submarine contract, heightening the uncertainty around the project.
Sources have said Australia is strongly considering buying a version of the 4,000-ton Soryu-class submarine built by Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Kawasaki Heavy Industries to replace its aging Collins-class fleet.
But Abbott on Sunday promised shipbuilder ASC Ltd. the option to bid for the next-generation submarines, worth as much as 40 billion Australian dollars ($31 billion), in an attempt to shore up support ahead of a challenge to his leadership from within the ruling Liberal Party. He survived the revolt during a vote earlier Monday.
Abbott had pledged ahead of his election in 2013 that up to 12 submarines would be built at ASC in South Australia state, before beginning to backpedal last year, signaling that cost and timely delivery were paramount.
His government ruled out an open tender in December, appearing to put Japan in the driver’s seat.
Independent South Australian Sen. Nick Xenophon questioned the sincerity of Abbott’s weekend pledge.
“If the prime minister was genuine about the subs being built in Australia he could have, should have, announced that there would be a competitive process culminating with a build right here in Australia,” he told the Australian Broadcasting Corp.
Swedish defense firm Saab, France’s state-controlled naval contractor DCNS and Germany’s ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems have expressed interest in the project.
For Japan, such a deal would mark its re-entry into the global arms market after Prime Minister Shinzo Abe ended a ban on weapons exports last year.
South Australian state Defense Minister Martin Hamilton-Smith said Abbott’s pledge was unclear and left room for the submarines to be built overseas, potentially in Japan.
“Nothing short of adhering to the promise that was made to South Australians prior to the federal election . . . will do,” he told the ABC.
Tokyo appeared puzzled as well.
A Japanese government source involved in the submarine talks said Japan “doesn’t know what Abbott meant” by his weekend promise.
If Australia issued a formal tender, it was highly unlikely Japan would take part because of political sensitivities.
“If we are asked that’s not a problem, but we can’t really be seen to be going out and actively pursuing a deal,” the source told Reuters, echoing comments Japanese sources have previously made about taking part in an open tender.
Abbott on Monday denied there were any “secret deals” for Japan to build the hull or major parts of the submarines, but that a “competitive evaluation process” would likely include foreign partners.
“We want the best possible submarines at the best possible price,” he said.
“We are talking, not just to the Japanese, although we certainly are talking to them, we are talking to the French, we are talking to the Germans.”
In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.