/

Western media distorts Japan

by

Those two favorite targets for Western moralizing about Japanese corporate corruption — Olympus (cameras) and Recruit (information) — are back in the headlines. Both typify the shallowness of much Western reporting in Japan.

Olympus is a first-rate Japanese company credited with saving millions of lives with its advanced endoscope (internal camera) technology. But like many other Japanese firms in the late 1980s it got caught up in Tokyo’s response to Washington demands that Japan inflate its economy to ease massive U.S. trade deficits.

Zaitech — literally financial skill — was the slogan of the day. It called for companies to diversify away from their main business lines and begin trading in land and securities. The result was the bubble economy, followed by the collapse of asset prices in the early 1990s. Companies like Olympus, caught up in the real estate fever of the time, had to decide what to do next.

At the time many held on to their devalued assets, believing Tokyo’s assurances that a soft landing for the economy was on the way. Few could foresee that Tokyo’s planners would embrace the foolish austerity and supply-side policies then popular with U.S. economists. Before long Japan had sunk into the deflationary swamp where it has stayed for the past two decades.

At first Olympus, like many others, tried to postpone declaring losses by using the then-legitimate accounting technique tobashi. But then the Western-influenced mark-to-market economic purists moved in and tobashi was declared illegal. Sure enough, this saw another wave of asset price collapses and company bankruptcies.

Olympus now faced another dilemma; Tokyo had begun jailing directors who had tried to save their companies by continuing to cover up asset losses. It had to get its losses off its books. But as a traditional camera company it knew little about the skilled accounting techniques needed. It tried to muddle through and inevitably fell into the clutches of cover-up charlatans. And as its problems deepened, it turned to a foreign executive, Michael Woodford, to serve as president in a bid to help disguise the continuing cover-up.

In the normal course of events Olympus would eventually have gotten rid of its impaired assets, though at much loss to itself. But Woodford seems to have decided early on that his mission in life was to expose the company’s amateurish accounting moves as evil corruption.

He was sacked on the grounds he did not understand Japan — a reasonable response to his seeming inability to realize the dilemma his company had faced and the role he was expected to play. But for our Western media vultures it was fresh meat — a shining example of a foreigner being persecuted for trying bravely to clean up Japan’s polluted political and corporate stables.

Woodford’s recent book “Exposure — From President to Whistleblower at Olympus” is now gaining the same kind of publicity as that given to the myth that brave Western media intervention was needed to have former Prime Minister Kakuei Tanaka removed from Japan’s corrupt political scene.

The so-called Recruit scandal of the 1980s is a yet another myth being revived as the company recently prepared to list its shares on the market. Recruit was founded in 1960 by a brilliant entrepreneur, Ezoe Hiromasa.

After he graduated from the University of Tokyo, his immediate and first venture was a broadsheet listing job opportunities for graduates. He then had the revolutionary idea of publishing magazines listing accommodations for rent or sale, thanks to which no longer did we, myself included, have to spend days scouring Tokyo’s pokey, inefficient real estate agencies simply to find somewhere to live.

He followed that with magazines listing the job vacancies, which previously job-hunters could only find through feudalistic connections. He purchased at some loss two U.S. Cray super-computers in a bid to show willingness to help ease U.S.-Japan trade frictions. He helped to organize the large-scale resort development that Japan needed to revitalize remote areas. He also pioneered the promotion of women to top executive positions in his company. In short he was exactly the kind of enlightened businessman that Japan needed then, now, and in the future.

But that was not how Japan Inc. decided to see him. For them, he was an unpredictable upstart with a lower-class background. His final and fatal move was to try to improve on Japan’s then highly corrupt system for share placements. In those pre-bubble days anyone able to receive unlisted share issues, especially those involving land, were guaranteed spectacular profits. So Japan’s securities companies would make sure those shares went to their friends — gangsters, sokaiya (corporate extortionists) and sleazy politicians especially.

Ezoe decided the shares in his new real estate subsidiary, Recruit Cosmos, would go a somewhat cleaner route — to the politicians, bureaucrats and businessmen who could or would help him with his ventures. But Japan’s giddy media, seemingly ignorant of how share placements were being made in their own country, decided that this was bribery, even though some of the recipients ended up with losses on their shares.

Ezoe had made little effort to disguise his actions. For more than a year the media had great fun digging out names of share recipients and forcing them into humiliating apology and retirement. They even decided that Ezoe’s use of backdoor funds to obtain that loss-making Cray computer was also evil.

The height of this media hysteria was the trial of Ezoe and former Cabinet secretary, Takao Fujinami, for bribery. At the time, Japan’s university education system and Ezoe’s job magazines were being thrown into chaos by the way companies tried to recruit students long before graduation. To restore some order, Ezoe had got himself appointed to an official education reform committee. And to do that, he had made contributions to Fujinami’s political funds.

Arrested for bribery, Ezoe held out for 103 days in arbitrary detention before being given a 13-year suspended sentence. He died a broken man (I knew him quite well). And while his company has survived and continues its good work, its name is constantly being dragged out by Western media as an especially egregious example of Japan’s corrupt business-political connections.

Let me suggest that if Western media need a mission, it is take a much harder look at how Japan really thinks and acts.

Gregory Clark is a former university president turned commentator on Japanese affairs, long resident in Japan. A Japanese translation of this article will appear on www.gregoryclark.net

  • anoninjapan

    Oh dear…this author really has drunk the cool aid!

    This is the same kind of blind ignorance exhibited by British Generals in WW1 when sending in troops to battle all for the sake of gaining 1 foot of ground, yet ignoring the tens of thousands died doing so and calling it a victory.

    This pretty much sums the author up:

    “..He was sacked on the grounds he did not understand Japan — a reasonable response to his seeming inability to realize the dilemma his company had faced and the role he was expected to play..”

    The “role” he is expected to play…..if it sounds like a duck and smells like a duck…

    What utter nonsense. I think the author needs get out more and stop reading those “romantic” novels of duty and the spirit of Bushido!

    • rossdorn

      While I, like every other reader, fail to find any argument against Clark’s reasoning in your rant, other than the fact, that you do not like it, my experience tells me that usually, what Clark writes is always pretty much dead on….

      • anoninjapan

        So..what M.Woodford did – speak out, was that illegal?..or were the practices he exposed, illegal?

    • Shimomura Wong

      Are you Nihon-jin, if not gain- jin?

      • anoninjapan

        and that matters how?

      • Shimomura Wong

        My answer would be Nihon Kokoro, banzai; banzai.!!!

      • anoninjapan

        Ugh…!

  • James

    While I do not have much knowledge about the specific incidents that the writer has discussed, I am going to agree with the article’s general notion of Western media distorting Japan.

    A few days after 3/11, i received a call from my families urging me to flee Tokyo since Japanese themselves were “fleeing in the hundreds of thousands” and Tokyo was a “ghost town”. Switching on the TV, those were indeed the images I saw. The reporter showed images of a mountain of people trying to enter stations and board trains and claimed that Japanese were “fleeing Tokyo”. What the reporter failed to mention was that train services were reduced to save electricity so that brought about a larger number of people congregating to commute to work. The images showed Japanese wearing face-masks “to avoid radiation” while ignoring the fact that every spring time masks are worn due to hay fever. Besides that, masks are also worn while suffering from the flu. Images were shown of darkened streets and conclusions of a “deserted, ghost-town” were made.

    Even if one could justify that the events of 3/11 were extraordinary and reporters had a tendency to inflate events, it also happens during other un extraordinary events. An elderly American tourist was taken in for questioning for being in possession of a pocket knife much larger than allowed by law and Western media and commentators reported of “persecution of tourists by Japanese authorities”. Japanese law regulates the hours of operation of nightclubs, common to some other countries, yet we have people writing that “dancing is outlawed”. The inaccuracy of such reporting, whether intentional or genuinely mistaken and I believe it to be the former, is akin to lying. Just a year or two ago, Toyota became the world’s largest automaker. In the same week, media reports of the “dark side of Toyota” started emerging. There are numerous other examples of such incidents: How about the Police stopping someone to check for his or her ID and then Debito Ardou crys foul for discrimination.

    Why do people do this? I will save it for some other day.

    • zer0_0zor0

      Now TEPCO is a legitimate target, but there is a corruption with the national government along the lines of the ENRON scandal in the USA, but the nuclear connection changes the register of the problem. That is somewhat different than simple corruption and embezzlement within a company.

      I agree with you, however, that the Japan-bashing in the English language news media is practically propagandistic in terms of its correspondence to reality.

    • TomokoHasegawa

      I agree with you about the reporting after 3/11 in the Western media. It was so bad at getting the basic facts right that I still meet people who think all the thousands of victims of the Tsunami died because of radiation. I think there was no misunderstanding at play, but also no intention of Japan bashing on the other hand. The Western media simply saw a huge opportunity for click bait, similar to 9/11. And it knew it could get away with distorting reality in “faraway Japan” to make the news as catastrophic as possible. Simply unethical journalism.

      I strongly disagree about the notion of Toyota’s dark side being manufactured to thwart competition, though. If anything, Japanese businesses’ “colorful” practices never were given the level of scrutiny they always deserved, since the invention of modern Japan. So any reporting on them, regardless of timing, is welcome and long overdue.

  • Steve Jackman

    This article is so wrong on so many levels that I wouldn’t even know where to begin refuting it.

    A much better article would be, “Japanese Media Distorts Japan”. Japanese media in general (with the exception of this newspaper) rarely reports on anything which reflects poorly on Japan, especially if it thinks foreigners may get wind of it. As such, I feel it has little integrity, objectivity or professionalism. Even in the case of Olympus, the mainstream Japanese media was completely mum about it for a long time even after it was (rightly) covered by foreign media.

    I feel sorry for those who rely solely on Japanese media for their news and information, since they will never be knowledgeable or well informed about what really goes on in Japan.

    Even foreign journalists who are assigned to cover Japan by top foreign news outlets are constantly harrassed, intimidated and threatened by dark forces in Japan, made up mostly of Japanese nationalists and ultra-conservatives, every time they expose something about Japan that these nuts don’t approve of. Over the long term, this unfortunately has the effect that these foreign journalists either tone down their coverage of real news about Japan (focusing instead on feel-good and fluff pieces), or they start self-censoring their coverage about Japan. It’s too bad that Japanese levels of journalism are so far behind other developed countries.

    • rossdorn

      No one will argue with your “Japanese Media Distorts Japan”. This is basically almost a third world country which continuously wants and needs to hype itself to compensate for the utterly lousy quality of life it provides for its people. The problem with foreign correspondents is that, given the economic reality of the media nowadays, they either are anyway just sitting back home in their own countries and copy and paste others opinion who had their “work” also simply copied and pasted, or, they neither can nor want to see japanese reality, which anyway takes a several years of living here, as even you probably are aware of by now….

      That is all true.
      But that does not make a thing in that article wrong, because while simply making the statement that it is, you are not giving us a single reason, why that is so.
      The point is the same that another commentator here also made, that neither you nor he like what Clark writes, who has been living a few more years in Japan than both of you together, and his articles so far always have always stood up to research.

      So kindly understand what he writes, do your research and THEN tell us what you find wrong with it. I for my part will be very interested in the result….

      • Steve Jackman

        The thing which the author conveniently ignores is that the criminal behavior by Japanese management at Olympus came to light ONLY because a foreigner was appointed as the President of the company. There are undoubtedly many more Japanese companies which are involved in criminal behavior, who one never hears about because there are no senior level foreigners at these companies.

        After having lived here and working professionally at some of Japan’s top companies, I am confident in saying that one of the main reasons Japanese corporations are so resistent to having senior level non-Japanese employees is because they are afraid that they will expose shady business practices by Japanese management which routinely take place at Japanese companies.

      • rossdorn

        I totally agree and Clark does NOT ignore that, if you read his articles it is clear to see….

      • zer0_0zor0

        And you would pretend that the USA, for example, is any better?

        The USA is worse, as an even greater litany of scandals attests.

        Neither business/corporate culture is laudable, but the Japan bashing is hypocritical.

        Eric Holder is a disgrace for not having prosecuted anyone in the finance sector for their criminal behavior in relation to the mortgage-based derivatives, etc., market crash, and perhaps even worse, he didn’t prosecute two Bush era DOJ lawyers responsible for the so-called Terror Memos.

        The USA is even more of a “USA Inc.” than Japan is a “Japan Inc.”.

    • Shimomura Wong

      Good,foreigners in reporting should be be more hospitable because their own country not that clean and pure too

  • Paul Johnny Lynn

    I’ve liked some of Gregory’s articles before, but I have to say portraying ‘poor little Olympus’ as the victim, a guileless corporate innocent, lead astray by the evils of Western influence, while applauding their treatment of Woodford is somewhat distasteful.

    • rossdorn

      ‘poor little Olympus’ maybe what you read into this. I also see that, but I also see his criticism of japanese corporate culture, that has an absurd idea about itself when it comes to exist and survive and succeed in a globalised world.

      There is not one single japanese corporation that is at the top of the business. Instead of inventing a new sensation like the “Walkman” was many decades ago, they now try to sell the world stemcells made from lemonade and fail to understand that the country is a laughing stock of the financial world and on a downward slide like no other.

      ‘poor little Olympus’ is a victim, but because of its own hilarious incompetence.

      • Paul Johnny Lynn

        I often say to students that the industries that helped establish Japan post-war (electronics, cameras, cars, and motorcycles) are headed the way of the dodo once China overcomes it’s (perceived and real) quality control problems. When the average Joe is offered the choice of 2 products of equal quality, but one is 1/3 the price, well, who wouldn’t.

      • rossdorn

        If your students are Japanese, then either will not believe you, or they will call their fathers who will kill you for that…. ;-)

      • Paul Johnny Lynn

        98% of them are Japanese, luckily most of them have a brain (and use it) though and agree with me. Let’s not forget either that so many of those products were reverse engineered, or just plain copied from existing Western examples too.

      • zer0_0zor0

        Not quote so. Are you familiar with the American concept of “built in obsolescence”? General Motors was a pioneer (pun intended) in that field.

      • Paul Johnny Lynn

        Beg yours? Don’t see the relevance of your reply.

      • zer0_0zor0

        Not all Japanese products are “reverse engineered”, etc.
        Look up the phrase “built-in obsolescence”, and it should become clear what I was getting at.
        Granted, I don’t deny that a lot of Japanese products are somewhat derivative improvements on Western precedents, but that doesn’t encompass the whole story. The USA betrayed its own values when corporate America turned against innovation in an effort to secure a predictable cycle in market turnover, and that allowed Japan and Germany to overtake her in the affected fields.

      • Paul Johnny Lynn

        I’m fully aware of what the term designed obsolescence means, I just didn’t see the relevance. And of course not all Japanese products are reverse engineered, merely most of the ones the post-war success has been built on, eg: cars, cameras, motor-bikes, audio-visual and house-hold appliances.

      • zer0_0zor0

        The country still has Toyota and an actual Nobel prize winner for groundbreaking stem cell research.

  • itoshima2012

    Mr Clark, agree totally! Thanks for this article!

  • abc

    What a totally ridiculous article. Gregory Clark’s method seems to be: take an incident or issue that involves behavior by Japanese people that any normal person (including 99.9% of Japanese) would regard as deplorable, and contrive to claim that the Japanese were in the right and the West was in the wrong, even when that clearly flies in the face of reality – as in the Olympus case.

  • Toolonggone

    Oh boy, this man is totally pathetic. Does he really believe that Olympus and Recruit could be different stories if western media stayed out of business? Hello?? It was Japanese news media who struck down these two cases as corporate scandal. His description of Japan’s scandal is not true. Speaking of idiocy.

    • Paul Johnny Lynn

      Actually (I may be wrong, but) if I recall correctly the mainstream Japanese press only ran with it after Western media had reported it. I think some smaller independent local magazines had talked about it, but their readership is limited.