/

Time to end the interference

by William Pfaff

We have today entered a new political — or politico-religious — period in which the Muslim peoples of the Middle East are seizing control of their own fortunes, a control lost as a result of the First World War and the defeat of the Ottoman Empire, which, with its Arab Caliphate predecessors in Crusader times, traces back to the very origin of Islam in what now is Syria, Iraq and Arabia proper.

Few in the West seem to have grasped the significance of the fact that Muslims themselves have taken over the struggle against Islamic radicalism.

The West did not start the war in Syria. Until chemical weapons were used in the war, it has had no direct implication in it — and feeble indirect ones other than to assist the victims.

It is the Syrians’ war and that of the other Arabs who have chosen to take part. The rebellion in Syria has divided into sectarian factions: the Alawites led by President Bashar Assad; Sunni Islamists supported by Saudia Arabia and Gulf Arabs; Shiite radicals supported by Iranians and Hezbollah; Kurds; plus several Christian communities trying to escape the fighting.

Many Western officials and individuals have since 2001 implicitly or explicitly identified the 9/11 attacks as the first blows in a global clash of Muslim and Western civilizations, a notion then in fashion among Western policymakers, picked up from the academic world and accepted by credulous Muslim intellectuals and activists as a plausible (if wrongheaded) explanation of the West’s enmity toward their society.

Clash of civilizations still is the explanation for the crisis that is believed in retrograde circles of Western governments, expediently promoted by Israel whose interests it serves, as well as by the multiplying number of would-be Muslim combat organizations (plus websites, serving audiences of rootless or uprooted Muslim emigres and converts in radicalized Western ghettos).

The war of civilizations explanation is wrong, and dangerously so. There has been a great change since 2001.

The Western assault on Muslim radicals, launched by President George W. Bush with his invasion of Iraq in search of phantom Arab nuclear weapons, American B-52 bombardments followed by unending war in Afghanistan, those programs of illegal and immoral assassinations that have followed under the direction of Barack Obama, and a Pentagon now reorganized and geared to global action against Islamic radicalism — all of these have thus far met an unbroken series of military defeats or political frustrations or “blowback.” And, yet, they are being extended, and the American army now is spinning a web of intervention and violence in Africa.

These policies have instead set in action a powerful series of new movements inside a fissiparous and demoralized Middle East. These are hostile to or independent of the West, or only marginally linked or supported, and are committed to a devastating series of wars inside Islamic civilization — or at least inside the Mediterranean Arab part of global Islam, one part of that vastly larger religious civilization that also dominates Indonesia and Malaysia, Pakistan and Central Asia, and a part of China.

The crisis is essentially an Arab phenomenon, and indirectly a Western one. It exists because the Mediterranean is where European (and latter-day American) imperialism interacted most intimately with Islam. This war within Muslim civilization is sectarian — Sunni against Shiite — and national because the modern Arab world was defined by imperialism in terms of modern monarchies subsequently become republics and/or military or secret policy dictatorships.

The Arabs, Egyptians and Maghrebis are struggling to identify themselves and their own destinies, which certainly are not, as Washington thinks, eventually to become acolytes and puppets of Western secular, irreligious or anti-religious, exploitative globalized and militarized capitalism.

The process has begun in revolt and bloodshed in Egypt, Libya, Syria and Yemen — bloodshed first foreshadowed by radical upheaval against the U.S.-led West, its modern military presence and actions in the region, provoking the reactionary radicalism of al-Qaida — which was preceded by Washington’s clandestine military intervention in Afghanistan, inviting Russian invasion and the terrible struggle that followed.

From that eventually came the devastating 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington, and all that has followed.

It is essential that the West now cease its interference. It cannot reconcile the Syrians, or the Sunnis and Shiites, nor the conflicts in the Maghreb and the Sahel, mainly produced by climate and history.

The West has suffered the delusion that a war on these people would produce modernity and democracy. War is a destroyer, which includes among its victims those who initiate it.

Visit William Pfaff’s website for more on his latest book, “The Irony of Manifest Destiny: The Tragedy of America’s Foreign Policy,” at www.williampfaff.com. © 2013 Tribune Content Agency

  • http://www.sheldonthinks.com/ andrew Sheldon

    Whilst one can deride US values, whether in domestic and foreign policy, it would be pertinent to note two things:
    1. Not everyone in the US and broader world sanctioned the war; libertarians were largely against it, despite some penchant for conservatism among them.
    2. The Middle East does not exactly convey the most coherent and rational framework of values
    I would however concede, as a matter of context, that we might expect more from better educated Americans. but then, you look at the American & Western ‘Prussian’ education system, and you think…no, that’s about right.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_CeWip5BpU

  • zer0_0zor0

    the Muslim peoples of the Middle East are seizing control of their own fortunes, a control lost as a result of the First World War and the defeat of the Ottoman Empire

    It’s good to see some historical context to the struggle against religious sectarianism and modernity. It was one thing for Ataturk to secularize Turkey’s Sunni population, but it is another to quell sectarian strife and extremism.

    Ans with respect to “interference”, the issue of the creation of the “Jewish state” of Israel cannot be ignored, as that introduces another variable with a religious dimension into the equation.

    Not only is it a different religion, i.e., not a question of sectarian strife, but the fact that the West sanctioned the creation of a modern state with what many see as a theocratic dimension problematizes the West’s true aims in the region.

    With the recent overtures for a rapprochement between the USA and Iran, it will be interesting to see how this works out.