What will replace the signature?

Regarding the Bloomberg Global Perspective of Sept. 20, “The case against cursive writing”: I do not think less of children or young adults who cannot write because they were not taught cursive handwriting in school. It is a laborious, lengthy, time-consuming lesson in an environment where teachers are called on to do so much more these days, and there is only so much one can do to satisfy the politicians and the parents.

I don’t think schools have any obligations whatsoever to satisfy the expectations of business, because I don’t see it as the job of schools to prepare young people for the workforce. That’s the responsibility of businesses after they hire fresh employees — to train them in their work.

The responsibility of schools is to cultivate well-rounded, broadly literate people, critically thinking and self-motivated.

But my opinion of people is negatively affected when I meet adults who cannot sign their names. I’ve met North Americans like this, university graduates who sign their names in print like elementary school third graders. Commentary on their lack of cursive ability is met with blank stares, indicating that the failure goes beyond mere dexterity.

It’s a problem because one’s signature — always executed in cursive script — is a legal vehicle, or has habitually been a legal vehicle used to authenticate and confirm documents like contracts, wills, passports and applications, and to confirm identity as well.

What will replace the legal stature of the signature if coming generations are cursive-challenged?

Maybe Westerners will go the way of the official seal, like the Japanese hanko and inkan, developing some digital device like the signet rings of old, a device programmed with data to confirm our identity. Just press it to the pad or screen.

Or maybe we will devolve to a personal “mark,” like the “X” illiterate characters make in the movies. This seems to be what happened with U.S. Treasury Secretary J.J. Lew, who was criticized for his crazy loop-de-loop signature (“U.S. Treasury chief ‘fixes’ unusual signature scribble,” The Washington Post article published in The Japan Times on June 20).

grant piper
tokyo

The opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are the writer’s own and do not necessarily reflect the policies of The Japan Times.

  • LeslieFish

    Oh come on! Your legal signature is any depiction of your name which you always use and is recognizable as your signature. Just ask any lawyer. It absolutely does not have to be in Cursive! In fact, Cursive is possibly the worst form of script for legibility. Other forms — Italic, Blackletter, Copperplate, and so on — are far more legible, easier to learn, quicker to teach, and frankly more beautiful. Forget Cursive; teach the kids Italic, and watch them develop distinctive signatures of their own.

    –Leslie < Fish

  • Mike Wyckoff

    haven’t we already moved toward finger-printing to replace the signature? At least thats what anyone with a new iphone 5s is thinking.