Rich states resettle barely 1% of Syrian refugees; Japan takes none: report

AFP-JIJI, Staff Report

Wealthy countries have resettled only a fraction of the nearly 5 million refugees who have fled Syria, Oxfam said Tuesday, urging them to step up and do their share.

The British charity called on wealthy countries to resettle at least 10 percent of the 4.8 million Syrian refugees registered in the region surrounding the war-ravaged nation by the end of the year.

So far, rich countries have pledged fewer than 130,000 resettlement spots, and only around 67,100 people — a mere 1.39 percent of the refugees — have made it to their final destinations since 2013, Oxfam said.

The charity issued its report ahead of an unprecedented U.N.-hosted conference in Geneva on Wednesday, where countries will be asked to pledge resettlement spots for Syrian refugees.

As the brutal conflict enters its sixth year, most of the people who have fled are located in Syria’s immediate neighbors such as Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan and Iraq.

But as the war has dragged on and conditions have worsened in the surrounding states, Syrians have increasingly set their sights on Europe, accounting for most of the more than 1 million migrants who risked their lives crossing the Mediterranean last year.

They are also believed to be heavily represented among the more than 7,500 people, including many children, who have died trying to make the crossing since 2014.

Wednesday’s conference, which will be opened by U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, will aim to ensure “global responsibility sharing” for the crisis sparked by Syria’s brutal conflict, which has claimed more than 270,000 lives.

“To date, the response to calls of increased resettlement of vulnerable refugees has been disappointing, and the conference is an opportunity for states to mark a change of course,” the Oxfam report said.

The charity said its analysis showed only three of the world’s wealthy countries — Canada, Germany and Norway — had pledged more resettlement spots than what was considered their “fair share” according to the size of their economies.

Five other countries, Australia, Finland, Iceland, Sweden and New Zealand had meanwhile pledged more than half of their fair share, while the remaining 20 nations included in the analysis fell far short, Oxfam said.

Japan, meanwhile, has not pledged to accept any Syrian refugees against the tally of 49,768 that is considered to be its fair share, the analysis showed. Japan was one of five rich nations that did not pledge any resettlement or humanitarian spots, the report said. The others were Greece, South Korea, Russia and Slovakia.

While continuing to offer aid to the conflict-hit region, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said in September that Japan — the world’s third-largest economy — must improve the living standards of its own people before it can consider accepting Syrian and other refugees.

According to Justice Ministry figures, a record 7,586 people sought asylum last year in Japan. But a mere 27 people were granted refugee status, compared with 16 the previous year.

So far, France had only pledged to take in 1,000 Syrian refugees, or just 4 percent of the nearly 26,000 considered its fair share, the report said.

The United States, which has resettled 1,812 Syrian refugees and said it will take in 10,000 more, has meanwhile pledged just 7 percent of the nearly 171,000 considered to be its fair share, the report showed.

The Netherlands also stood at 7 percent, Denmark at 15 and Britain at 22, Oxfam said.

“We need to show Syrian people that ‘solidarity’ is an action, not a sound bite,” Oxfam chief Winnie Byanyima said in a statement.

“Countries with a strong economy, good services and developed infrastructure can immediately resettle 500,000 refugees between them — if they chose to,” she said.

Byanyima said that in Lebanon, one in five inhabitants is a Syrian refugee, while they constitute 10 percent of the population in Jordan, which counts a refugee camp as its fourth largest “city.”

“These countries have fragile economies and weak infrastructure. They can no longer shoulder this responsibility virtually alone,” she said, insisting that the Geneva conference “should result in urgent solutions, offering people safe and legal routes to a welcome in third countries.”

  • Yuki

    I don’t think letting 50 thousand Syrians in to Japan would be a good idea. Unlike other countries (especially in the middle east), they would have a VERY hard time adjusting to Japanese culture. Also, I’m not sure if the police forces would be set up to handle the extra crime the way some other countries can.

    • Thunderball

      Then Japan should accept the Japanese (in millions) who are in South America (most of them are pure Japanese); and they WANT to return back to Japan!! Do not know why Japan never recognises these people; they have priority over Syrians and other refugees!! At lease, if these Japanese (in South America) granted Japanese citizenship and return back to their ORIGINAL HOME (Japan), then there will be enough space in South America for more refugees!!! This is my personal opinion based on what I have learnt from “many” Japanese-Latin friends! Please notice that Italy, Germany and other European nations have already granted their citizenships (and the right to return back home)
      to their own nations who immigrated to South America!!!

      • zer0_0zor0

        There are a lot of Japanese from Brazil and other countries that have returned (and I believe that they do have that right), but they haven’t integrated into Japanese society smoothly in many cases, because of the cultural differences and language.

        But surely you already know that. So what is your point?

  • zer0_0zor0

    Japan didn’t cause the crisis in Syria; the CIA did, under authorization by Nobel Peace Prize holder President Barack Obama!

    Oh, wait, the president is coming to Hiroshima to seal his legacy as a man of peace…

  • Steve Jackman

    This goes to show once again why Japan should not be allowed to become a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council. A country which is so disengaged from the rest of the global community has no business being a part of the U.N. Security Council.

    • kyushuphil

      Yes, Steve, “disengaged” — but also not.

      Right now the ministry in charge of education for Japan seeks to keep in place the conceit that Japanese never need be aware of “others.” The whole worldview built into “sadamerarete iru” says that there is only one “way,” and very old men at the top preserve that way, and it’s simply the job of everyone to fit themselves to it, no questions asked.

      Having “others” actually here in Japan would challenge the current complacency and imaginative cowardice that rule all institutional life. Would challenge all the kissing-up to authorities, all the submergence of everybody to the continued mindless apparent safely in all those same-age cohort group regimentations.

      Worse, it might free the many talented women in Japan, thus threatening all those men who’ve learned extra incompetence for themselves in order to fit the “sadamerarete iru.”

      But at another level, all this learning to grovel in institutions engages quite perfectly with the worst of the TPP planned for Japan. The materialism that is ruinous now at so many levels can roll over all — all the more — if the currently absolutely evil education system lets its conformity indoctrination keep engaging with whatever may yet profit the worst corporate predators.