Clinton, Sanders debate who is better for Hispanics


Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders tangled repeatedly in their eighth presidential debate over who is a true advocate for Latinos and who has a track record of letting Hispanics down.

Fighting for Florida and beyond, the two faced off Wednesday night just six days before Florida gives its verdict on the presidential race.

Clinton faulted Sanders for repeatedly voting against a 2007 comprehensive immigration reform bill; he faulted her for opposing a 2007 effort to allow people who were in the country illegally to obtain driver’s licenses.

Had the immigration package passed back then, Clinton said, “a lot of the issues we are still discussing today would be in the rearview mirror.”

Sanders retorted that he opposed the legislation because it included a guest worker program “akin to slavery.”

Clinton has won 762 pledged delegates compared to 549 for Sanders, with 10 delegates from recent primaries still to be allocated. When superdelegates are included, Clinton leads 1,223 to 574, more than halfway to the 2,383 needed to win the Democratic nomination.

On the Republican side Wednesday, billionaire businessman Donald Trump called for Republicans to rally behind his candidacy after he won primaries in three more states, declaring that he could not be defeated in the November general election as the standard-bearer of a united party.

Clinton mocked Trump’s plan for a wall on the Mexican border, saying he’d build “the most beautiful tall wall, better than the great wall of China” to be “magically” paid for by Mexico. That, she said, is a fantasy.

Sanders largely agreed, adding his hope that in the immigration debate “we do not, as Donald Trump and others have done, resort to racism and xenophobia and bigotry.”

Both Sanders and Clinton were bidding for momentum after Sanders startled Clinton with an upset victory in Michigan on Tuesday. Both candidates laid out rival paths to the Democratic nomination.

Clinton stressed that she has a strong lead in the delegates, declaring, “This is a marathon, and it is a marathon that can only be carried by the kind of campaign I am running.”

Sanders said he’d come a long way from the early days when his campaign was largely written off and said his showing in Michigan was evidence that his message is resonating.

Clinton kept pushing on immigration matters, accusing Sanders of supporting legislation that would have led to indefinite detention of people facing deportation, and for standing with Minutemen vigilantes. Sanders called that notion “ridiculous” and “absurd,” and accused Clinton of picking small pieces out of big legislative packages to distort his voting record.

The candidates squared off soon after a testy debate in Michigan on Sunday in which they argued about trade and economic issues of particular interest in the industrial Midwest.

With Missouri, Illinois, Ohio among the states that will be voting on Tuesday, the candidates returned to a pointed matter they’d already argued about three days earlier, scuffling over Sanders’ vote against 2009 legislation that bailed out the auto industry, among others. Sanders said it was those “others” — big banks that had fueled the recession to begin with — that inspired him to vote no. Clinton stressed she’d made a different judgment to side with the automakers.

Immigration commanded considerable attention for good reason: Florida is home to nearly 1.8 million Hispanics, including about 15 percent of the state’s Democrats. A good share of those Florida voters already have locked in their decisions: nearly 487,000 Democrats have cast early ballots, representing about 11 percent of registered Democrats.

Hispanic voters have made up about 10 percent of voters in the Democratic primaries so far this year, and Clinton has been getting about two-thirds of their votes to about one-third for Sanders. The Vermont senator, for his part, stresses that he’s making progress on winning over younger Hispanics.

Overall, 691 delegates are at stake on Tuesday, including 99 in Florida, which awards all its delegates to the winner rather than dividing them up proportionately.