/

Japan pushes ahead with Hokkaido carbon capture test despite quake concerns

by

Bloomberg

Japan is preparing to test its biggest project yet for capturing and storing greenhouse gas pollution under the seabed despite concerns about cost and the safety of pursuing the technology in a region prone to earthquakes.

Engineers plan to inject carbon dioxide into deep saline aquifers off the coast of Hokkaido starting in April. The gas will be siphoned away from a refinery operated by Idemitsu Kosan Co. under the government-backed project.

Five years after an earthquake and tsunami triggered reactor core meltdowns in Fukushima, Japan is grappling for ways to generate power while meeting global goals for reducing fossil-fuel emissions. Carbon capture and storage, tested in many nations but working at a commercial scale almost nowhere, holds the promise of limiting the most damaging fumes from thermal power plants and giving Japanese companies a vast new market.

“Individual technologies have already been established” for the project, Tetsuo Kasukawa, a spokesman for Japan CCS Co., the Tokyo-based research company that built and prepared the site for the carbon injection, said in an interview in Tokyo. “We want to prove CCS is also possible in Japan.”

Some Japanese companies are already lending their expertise to and investing in CCS projects overseas. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. designed and built a project in Alabama with Southern Co.

Tokyo Gas Co., Osaka Gas Co. and Chubu Electric Power Co. are part of the alliance building the world’s largest CCS project, on Barrow Island off the coast of Western Australia.

The technology has its doubters, given that it can cost billions of dollars for a single plant and none has a long operational record at an industrial scale.

“It is our view that CCS is unlikely to play a significant role in mitigating emissions from coal-fired power stations,” authors including Ben Caldecott, director of the sustainable finance program at the University of Oxford’s Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, wrote in a report in January.

“Deployment of CCS has already been too slow to match” scenarios presented by the International Energy Agency and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Another concern is whether stored carbon dioxide will leak, releasing the greenhouse gas back into the atmosphere in high concentrations.

“There is no guarantee that carbon dioxide can be stored in a stable way in Japan, where there are many earthquakes and volcanic eruptions,” said Kimiko Hirata, a researcher of coal power projects for Kiko Network, a Kyoto-based environmental group.

CCS needs long-term monitoring, she added.

Since most CCS projects are still at the experimental stage, little data are available to calculate the risk of earthquakes caused by CCS.

Japan CCS is confident the geology of the area is sound.

“Carbon dioxide will be injected in such a way that there won’t be any impact on geological formation,” Kasukawa claimed. The carbon dioxide will be injected “little by little,” he said, contrasting it with hydraulic fracking, where oil and gas drillers pump fluid under pressure into formations to release trapped deposits.

The project off Hokkaido is the first in Japan to involve the three stages of the CCS process — capture, transfer and underground injection of carbon dioxide for storage — according to Kasukawa. An earlier demonstration project conducted by the Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth injected a total of 10,400 tons of carbon dioxide at a test site in Niigata Prefecture.

Beginning in April, between 100,000 tons to 200,000 tons of carbon dioxide will be injected annually into two separate reservoirs 1,000 meters and 3,000 meters, respectively, in depth under the seabed off the port of Tomakomai in Hokkaido, according to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, which is sponsoring the pilot project.

About ¥34 billion ($300 million) had been set aside for the project from the ministry for the four years through the end of this month to build the project site. Cost estimates for the entire project haven’t been made available by METI, though the government’s target is for CCS to be viable by 2020.

“It is difficult at this point to estimate how much CO2 emissions will be cut in Japan and how much of that should be achieved through CCS in the future,” said Takeshi Nagasawa, director of the global environment partnership office at METI. “But it is still important to build technologies so that we will be ready when it is needed.”

  • PetroleumTechnology

    An interesting question here is the native CO2 concentration that is being siphoned from the refinery. If it is high then cryogenic and/or membrane processes can be used to capture the CO2 very cheaply.
    Another question is whether the refinery stream has any significant SO2, as this would be highly problematic for the type of absorption technologies such as amine capture that have oddly been favored to date.
    Does anybody by chance know the answers to these questions please?

    • PetroleumTechnology

      Here is a little background as to why these two particular questions have been raised.

      In brief, the current model for CCS among the power companies has been to seek to extend the Absorption process successfully used for SO2 capture to also capture CO2. I would respectfully like to suggest that a less expensive alternative would be to simply copy the processes of the large oil companies (specifically using cryogenic separation and gas separation membranes). Not only is this approach much less expensive, but most importantly it is more robust with respect to SO2, which has been a major practical problem for the adaptation of the absorption process.

      If anyone is interested in learning more about how these proven oil company processes can be resourcefully adapted to capturing CO2 from coal-fired power plants, please connect with me on LinkedIn (David Willson at Stanbridge Capital).