/

Reluctant to speak, Fukushima moms admit fear of radiation, pressure from families

by

Staff Writer

To stay or to flee. Mothers in Fukushima Prefecture had to make harsh decisions for their families after the nuclear disaster of March 2011. More than four years on, they still have to.

Those who remain there live in constant fear for their children’s health. But choosing to flee opened them to accusations of being bad wives who abandoned their relatives, community and husbands tied to jobs.

It is a no-win situation for those who face the decision to stay or go, because they may be unable to live up to the ideal of a ryosai kenbo (good wife, wise mother).

“Consciously or subconsciously, women are aware of the role we are expected to play in a family. After the earthquake and nuclear disaster, however, everything changed,” said Yukiko (not her real name), a mother and voluntary evacuee in her 30s. “I can’t live up to those expectations any more, and society judges me.”

All women interviewed for this story spoke on condition of anonymity.

As the crisis at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant began to play out, Tokyo Electric Power Co. established a 20-km no-go zone around the site, outside of which the government said conditions were safe. Many did not believe the assertion.

Yuriko, a woman in her 70s who lives in the city of Minamisoma, Fukushima Prefecture, believes the zone restrictions divided the community.

“Some people trusted the government’s word and continued to live here, but others couldn’t stand living every day in fear and moved out,” Yuriko said. “Nobody knew what to believe and communities have fallen apart.”

The fear of radiation, rumors and media reports about the safety of local food prompted many mothers just outside the no-go zone to evacuate voluntarily for the sake of their children’s health. Some moved to neighboring prefectures, including Iwate and Miyagi, and others made the great leap south to Tokyo.

“To be honest, I didn’t have much knowledge about the nuclear reactors in Fukushima. But I did know how deadly high exposures of radiation could be,” said Yuko, in her 30s, who has a 6-year-old daughter. “I evacuated to Tokyo within a week of the disaster. My husband stayed in Fukushima, but I was determined to leave to prioritize the safety of my daughter.”

In many cases, voluntary evacuees like Yuko are mothers who fled with their children while their husbands remained in Fukushima to work.

Some were accused of abandoning or running away from their families, particularly those they married into. Relatives labeled the wives disloyal and overly sensitive.

The worried mothers, meanwhile, believe they are wise to protect their children from radiation exposure.

But with no concrete scientific or medical proof to justify their decision to flee, they often feel guilty for leaving a tight-knit community.

“Every time I go up to visit my hometown in Fukushima for a funeral or a traditional holiday, I’m always asked the same question by my relatives,” Yuko said.

” ‘When are you moving back home?’ they ask. ‘It’s safe now.’ The relationship I have with my family has become distant.”

Even those who evacuated to Tokyo may not find life any better.

The government helps evacuees whose homes were within the 20-km-wide zone with free accommodation and a monthly stipend. But voluntary evacuees do not qualify for this and thus struggle to make a living.

Life is just as difficult for mothers who remain in Fukushima. They have constant qualms about the invisible dangers of radiation and about whether they made the right choice by staying.

Some said they decided to stay for the sake of their husbands, to avoid separating the family. Some, like Hiroko, felt they had no choice — they had no money to evacuate, they could not find housing for a family of five with pets, and had a life in Fukushima they did not want to risk losing.

“It is strange because nobody talks about their worries dealing with 3/11,” said Hiroko, a 30-something who now lives in the town of Kashima, Fukushima Prefecture.

“It’s almost like the disaster never happened and people erased the crucial reality.”

Mothers who stay also face being branded as bad.

“Sometimes when I’m alone in the house, I start to cry, imagining the future of my children,” Hiroko said. “I fear my children may become sick, and the ones who I love most will hold a grudge against me for failing to protect them. That is my biggest fear.”

As reconstruction speeds up in the prefecture, with posters everywhere boasting slogans such as “Ganbaro Nippon” (Stick it out, Japan) or “Ganbaro Fukushima,” there is pressure on mothers to keep their worries to themselves.

What has saved some mothers are peer support groups — organizations specifically created for women to share information and give each other mutual support.

Among them is Beteran Mama no Kai (Veteran Mom’s Group), an organization based in both Fukushima and Tokyo.

The group’s main goal is to encourage mothers who were victims of 3/11 to speak to other women in a similar situation and make connections. Monthly events are held to check up on each other and to relieve stress.

Akiko was among the women who joined the group.

“I was able to speak to other women about topics I would have never been able to talk about on a daily basis, such as food regulations or radiation levels,” Akiko said. “I was able to make friends within the group, and I don’t feel so alone anymore.”

Academic experts say women have long been known to suffer heavily following a trauma like this.

“A disaster such as Fukushima is not a single event, but a period of struggle that continues to change over time,” said David Slater, professor of anthropology at Sophia University. “And women often carry the heaviest burden, working behind the scenes.”

While mothers who live in Fukushima fear for their children’s health and dread health checkups because of the risk of getting a bad diagnosis, those who voluntarily evacuated to Tokyo are contemplating whether to move back up north.

Some mothers worry that their children need a father figure in their lives.

Moreover, balancing two households, in Fukushima and Tokyo, is financially and emotionally difficult — and there is always the emotional pressure from relatives in Fukushima nagging them about their return.

Yet, some fear returning.

“If I am forced to move back to Fukushima, I have to pretend I don’t care about radiation — when I actually do,” said Yuko, the Tokyo evacuee.

  • aditya sudershan

    2001?

  • Rainer Klute

    Radiation isn’t the problem, but the fear of radiation is. So sad that radiophobia took the lives of 1,600 people due to rapid and chaotic evacuation! So sad that radiophobia hampers the lives of so many more!

    Below a dose of 100 mSv delivered in a short period of time there’s no need to be concerned. As far as I know, the highest personal dose delivered to the general public in Fukushima was only about half of that. This should give you some relief.

    • https://twitter.com/atomikrabbit atomikrabbit

      It’s interesting to note that if the nearby Fukushima communities hadn’t been evacuated at all, the maximum dose that would have been received by a member of the public would have been only 51 mSv (5.1 Rem), distributed over a period of a year. This is far below the amount at which biological effects can even be detected clinically. unscear(dot)org/docs/reports/2013/13-85418_Report_2013_Annex_A.pdf (page 190)

      Evacuation is not always the most “conservative” option. The public should have been instructed to shelter-in-place, with prophylactic distribution of thyroid protecting KI tablets, rather than the mass disruption of relocation. But with half-educated radiophobes like Kan and Jaczko making the decisions, the result was over a thousand elderly and infirm dying from evacuations, who would have been fine if left if place.

      Once again, we see a decision related to nuclear energy that was based solely on political, rather than technical, considerations.

  • Rainer Klute

    Radiation isn’t the problem, but the fear of radiation is. So sad that radiophobia took the lives of 1,600 people due to rapid and chaotic evacuation! So sad that radiophobia hampers the lives of so many more!

    Below a dose of 100 mSv delivered in a short period of time there’s no need to be concerned. As far as I know, the highest personal dose delivered to the general public in Fukushima was only about half of that. This should give you some relief.

  • Firas Kraïem

    “In many cases, voluntary evacuees like Yuko are mothers who fled with
    their children while their husbands remained in Fukushima to work.”

    This may be a revelator of how unhealthy the “traditional” Japanese family structure, where the husband is basically just a cash cow, is for all those involved.

  • brwstacsj

    I am glad that some of the women have found support groups in which they have the freedom to express their fears and concerns to people that are empathetic.
    I don’t agree with Rainer Klute’s post. Fukishima’s three cores are believed to have melted down and breeched their containment vessels. Radioactive water is still pouring out of the site. There are constant concerns about the safety of Fukishima’s infrastructure. On top of this, the Japanese parliament passed the State Secrete Act, which could lead to the imprisonment of reporters that leak any state secretes, which could include Fukushima. Based on these factors, if a person had a way to, I would evacuate permanently to be prudent.
    I feel so sad for these families because they have lost so much and face so many unknowns. I continue to keep them in my prayers.

    • Starviking

      The cores of reactors 1 and 2 have breached their reactor vessels. It is highly unlikely that they have breached containment.

      Radioactive water pours out of the site, into containment at the Daiichi Port. There has been little contamination off shore because of this.

      As for the conflation of the State Secrets Act with Daiichi, there is absolutely no evidence of this. Look at the Japan Times, The Asahi Shimbun, The Mainichi Shimbun – lots of anti-nuclear news about Daiichi. No one is being shut-up but the SSA.

    • Sam Gilman

      I’m afraid that people like you are causing many of these problems. As another poster has indicated, you list here lots of false information, and to mne it looks like with the clear aim of scaring people. It looks like you’re exploiting these people for your own agenda.

    • greenthinker2012

      Another false repetition of the “State Secrets Act” canard.
      Get real.

    • greenthinker2012

      Another false repetition of the “State Secrets Act” canard.
      Get real.

  • Tim Johnston

    I feel for the Mothers of those small children.
    As an adult I don’t worry, but as a parent I would very concerned. Second worst nuclear accident and the worst nuclear accident that has occurred ocean side.

  • Toolonggone

    It seems easy for detractors to accuse these women of being ignorant and paranoiac. But the real problem is with the inability of central government to provide sufficient information and knowledge about radiation effect and proper safety measurement in case of accident. The triple explosion and meltdown occurred at the very first few days was so menacing that it struck fear into the eyes of people. Did the government do anything remarkable to convince local residents that now it’s safe to return to their home–even those residing within just a couple of miles away from nuclear reactors? How much proportion of their money has been used for reconstruction of the town so far?? Hope we would not hear another phony narrative like New Orleans miracle after ten-year anniversary of national disaster in 2021.