Overseas work, study seen as negative point for anyone handling state secrets

Kyodo

The Cabinet Intelligence and Research Office has warned government offices before the new state secrecy law takes effect Wednesday that people who have studied or worked abroad have a higher risk of leaking secrets.

According to the 2011 documents obtained at the request of Kyodo News, the Cabinet Secretariat, the office that will supervise the controversial law with tougher penalties for leaking state secrets, pointed to the need to check educational and employment records in examining which public servants are deemed eligible to handle sensitive information.

Under the secrecy law, which was enacted in December last year, civil servants and others who leak sensitive information on foreign policy, defense, counterterrorism and counterespionage face up to 10 years in prison.

The legislation has drawn criticism over the possibility of arbitrary classification of state secrets that will undermine the people’s right to information.

The government plans to screen those who may be given access to state secrets, including public servants and defense industry workers.

Their background, links to spying or terrorism, mental condition, criminal records, drug use, drinking habits and debts will be checked. Only those who are believed to have no risk of leaking secrets will be approved to handle classified information.

Those being vetted will be asked about their educational history from high school and employment record over the past 10 years.

The documents presented by the intelligence and research office at a meeting with other government bodies in November 2011 state that the experience of attending schools overseas or foreign schools in Japan as well as working abroad or working for foreign companies “could be an opportunity to nurture a special feeling about foreign countries.”

The papers said such people “tend to be influenced by” approaches from foreign countries and there is a “risk” that they “prioritize the benefits of foreign countries and voluntarily leak secrets.”

The office of the Cabinet Secretariat said that academic and employment backgrounds are just “one of the check points” and will not solely decide who is deemed capable of dealing with classified information.

The office said the view of overseas experience was presented as part of a free exchange of opinions with other government entities to create an effective system to control state secrets.

Masahiro Usaki, a professor at Dokkyo Law School who is familiar with the secrecy law, said that “the government has been encouraging young people to go abroad amid the trend of globalization. So it doesn’t make sense that it will now judge (overseas experience) as a negative factor.”

“From the viewpoint of the right to privacy, research (on people’s background) should be minimum,” Usaki added, adding that checking only final educational status would be sufficient. He also said the period of 10 years covering past employment records is too long.

  • Rebane

    By similar reasoning the government in the near future will likely consider citizens with a good knowledge of English or any other foreign language are “dangerous” to the state. Let us study English harder now.

  • Ron NJ

    Typical of the mindset that anything that has left the shores of Glorious Nippon is forever tainted by the gaikoku and thus impure – now codified in government policy. Well done, Japan!

  • rossdorn

    It is sad….
    This state has always been a bad joke, and as it seems, will always be. What to do, this people lets these guys get away with everything and keeps on re-electing them.
    The rich and powerful would not be rich and powerful if they would not abuse taht much stupidity.

  • Firas Kraïem

    To be fair, most other countries also subject people with ties to a foreign country to additional scrutiny for such sensitive matters (how they are defined is another question). I myself was denied an internship with the French governmental agency in charge of information security because, due to my dual-citizenship, the screening process to obtain the necessary security clearance would have taken longer than the internship itself.

    • SC4649

      I don’t think simple experience abroad compares with multiple citizenships…

      • Firas Kraïem

        I was unfortunate enough to be among the most severe cases, but those who “simply” have ties to a foreign country are not given a free pass. You must report all travels to foreign countries, however short, and also all foreign citizens with whom you are in close relationships, be they personal or professional, and all those are duly investigated.

        Comments here seem to be woefully ignorant about how the state security world works in basically all of the world. Japan has been very naive in those issues (see for example how clueless they were during the hostage crisis in Algeria) and is just now starting to catch up.

      • OsFish

        Indeed. The US security clearance guidelines include as red flags for concern, receiving education abroad, having a family member abroad, having financial interests in foreign-owned companies and so on.

  • Charles

    Thank you, Abe’s cabinet, for doing this.

    You see, my girlfriend was planning to vote for you. But now, I can just show her this, and maybe she will change her mind, because she studied and worked abroad in the UK for six years, and she is sure not to approve of this. Once she can see how Abe’s cabinet is out to destroy her career prospects, maybe she will change her mind and not vote LDP.

    Please, LDP, do as many idiotic things like this right before the election as possible. It will be great ammunition to use against you, and will help people make more informed decisions about who to vote for on December 14 (basically, anyone but the LDP).