Utilities should have nuclear waste storage facilities as prerequisite for reactor restarts, panel says

Kyodo

Utilities should be responsible for establishing temporary storage facilities for high-level radioactive waste as a prerequisite for restarting their nuclear reactors, according to a panel of experts that advises the government.

The Science Council of Japan, which is made up of scientists, proposed in a report released on Thursday that the government start discussions about requiring electric power companies to set up facilities within their regions to store radioactive waste for 30 years. The idea would be to give the government time to come up with long-term policies, supported by the public, on how to dispose of the waste.

Restarting reactors without clear measures to cope with nuclear waste is irresponsible and will have an impact on future generations, the report said.

Although the panel’s proposals do not have legally binding power, the panel has the authority to advise the government. Its recommendation is likely to spur debate concerning the storage of nuclear waste, since the government’s new safety standards don’t currently require utilities to have waste storage facilities in place as a prerequisite for restarting their nuclear reactors.

From a technical point of view, the council said that dry cask storage, which usually uses steel cylinders, would be the best way to store spent nuclear fuel. Vitrification, in which the fuel is turned into solid glass, would be another option.

  • aliare

    I heard Jim Cramer is behind the website Emini S&P Trading Secret now, I don’t know if that’s true but I’m a member there and I’m learning to trade from them there course material is excellent and so is their support. I can recommend them if anybody is interested in learning to trade like I am.

  • goofyfootgaijin

    What a “radical” idea: that these companies should be responsible for doing something safe and ethical with the incredibly toxic waste they produce. That the government has allowed these monstrosities to run until recently without any plan for dealing with the forever toxic waste they produce is absolutely mind-boggling. If the answer is still “we don’t have space for the waste” decommissioning is the only reasonable path.

    • Starviking

      You’re balming the wrong people. The nuclear power programme was pushed by the government over 40 years ago. The government was supposed to provide a way to store the long-term waste. It didn’t.