NEW YORK – French bank BNP Paribas has agreed to pay U.S. authorities an $8.9 billion fine to avoid being tried in court for dealing with U.S.-blacklisted countries, sources close to the matter said.
The deal ends months of haggling which saw French President Francois Hollande pressing his U.S. counterpart Barack Obama to intervene and lighten the punishment.
Agreement on the record fine, approved by the bank’s board of directors at a special weekend meeting in Paris, is due to be announced Monday after markets close at the New York Stock Exchange around 4:00 p.m.
The U.S. Justice Department and New York banking regulator Benjamin Lawsky will make separate announcements, another source said, also speaking on condition of anonymity.
BNP declined requests for a public comment.
At least $2 billion of the fine will go to Lawsky, who is temporarily suspending parts of BNP’s dollar-handling business in the United States — key to any major bank’s U.S. operations — for all of 2015.
Sources said the suspension would take place progressively since BNP already has operations underway.
BNP — France’s largest bank — has until December 31 to find a bank that agrees to make dollar payments on its behalf.
The deal forces BNP to plead guilty to the bank’s deals from 2002 to 2009 with countries that Washington has blacklisted, like Cuba, Iran and Sudan.
The investigation probed more than $100 billion of transactions, finding that $30 billion of that amount were concealed in order to skirt the sanctions.
BNP has a strong enough capital base to handle the penalty, but the size of the fine and the temporary halt to its dollar-handling business will mean a significant hit on its earnings.
BNP chief executive Jean-Laurent Bonnafe reportedly wrote to employees on Friday conceding the bank will be “punished severely,” but stressing that “this difficulty . . . will not impact our road map.”
U.S. authorities have already forced BNP to dismiss three senior officials allegedly linked to the sanctions violations, including its chief operating officer.
Lower bank officials could also be fired as part of the settlement.
Sources say the settlement could include a year-long suspension of the bank’s dollar clearing for oil and gas trading activities in Switzerland, Singapore and France, and suspension of dollar clearing on behalf of other banks and some clients.
That would likely be a blow to the bank’s bottom line. In 2013 BNP reported total profits of €4.83 billion ($6.59 billion) on revenues of €38.8 billion. It has already set aside $1.1 billion to cover losses from the case.
BNP has been largely quiet about the allegations and potential penalties during months of negotiations.
Critics have accused Washington of being especially tough with foreign banks, and BNP in particular, while treating U.S. banking transgressions more lightly.
In punishing U.S. banks for financial crisis-related violations, negotiated fines have run into the billions but none has had to plead guilty — an act which could lead to the loss of a banking license.
In 2012 Dutch bank ING paid a relatively paltry $619 million for violations related to the financial crisis, and Britain’s Standard Chartered $670 million. HSBC, which was also accused of complicity in money laundering, paid $1.9 billion.
None were forced to plead guilty or halt certain banking operations.
But U.S. authorities have become much tougher on banks that are less cooperative in investigations.
In May, Credit Suisse pleaded guilty to helping Americans evade taxes and was fined $2.6 billion, over three times the $780 million fine U.S. authorities imposed on fellow Swiss bank UBS for the same charges in 2009.
Analysts say the size of the BNP fine relates to the size of the business it did with Sudan and Iran, several times larger than that handled by ING and Standard Chartered.
The BNP controversy has been a thorn in U.S.-France relations. French officials warned in early June that it could cause problems for the huge transatlantic trade treaty under negotiation between the European Union and the United States.
“Evidently . . . this risks having negative consequences,” Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius ominously warned.
Hollande also raised the issue with Obama during a dinner in Paris.
Fabius said that Hollande had told Obama the case is “very important for Europe and for France,” saying if BNP is weakened it would “create a very negative interference in Europe and its economy.”
But even before the dinner, Obama had signaled he would stay out of a legal issue.
“The rule of law is not determined by political expediency,” he said.