U.S. to relinquish key oversight role for Internet


The U.S. government announced Friday it was giving up its key role overseeing the Internet’s technical operations, handing over those functions to “the global multistakeholder community.”

The move “marks the final phase of the privatization” of the management of the Internet domain name system, said a statement from the U.S. Commerce Department.

The U.S. agency called for “global stakeholders to develop a proposal” for a transition to a new plan with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, a nonprofit group that took over some of the functions in 1997 under an agreement with the U.S. government.

The decision comes with Washington under pressure following revelations about vast surveillance programs operated by the secretive National Security Agency to collect intelligence and other data through a variety of methods.

ICANN leaders said during a conference call that the move by the U.S. was a sign that the organization has matured and that it was in the works long before leaked documents showed massive online snooping by intelligence agents.

“Every president, every board of ICANN since its inception has been working toward this day,” ICANN’s president and chief executive, Fadi Chehade, said during a conference call.

The end of the U.S. oversight role has no immediate impact for Internet users, and ICANN will continue to administer the network’s key technical functions.

The change affects U.S. government oversight of the “root zone” of databases underlying the Internet, which makes Washington a steward of that system even though the functions are contracted out to ICANN and the infrastructure company Verisign.

“The timing is right to start the transition process,” said Assistant Commerce Secretary Lawrence Strickling, who added that he looked forward to “an appropriate transition plan.”

The statement said the U.S. hopes to “support and enhance the multistakeholder model” and “maintain the openness of the Internet” under any new system.

ICANN said its role as administrator of the Internet’s unique identifier system remains unchanged. “The Internet’s Unique Identifier functions are not apparent to most Internet users, but they play a critical role in maintaining a single, global, unified and interoperable Internet,” ICANN said.

But the change leaves some questions unanswered on the future stewardship of the Internet.

Daniel Castro of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation said the United States “was bullied into making the change” due to pressure over the revelations of leaked NSA documents from former contractor Edward Snowden.

“The Snowden disclosures are merely a pretext,” Castro said in a blog post. “While the NSA revelations have rightly angered many people around the world, they have nothing to do with Internet governance. The U.S. Department of Commerce has not once abused its oversight of ICANN to aid the intelligence community.”

Castro said the change opens the door to governments such as Russia or China modifying the Internet architecture for political reasons. Without U.S. oversight, “ICANN would not be accountable to anyone, and would be motivated only by the interests of those individuals who control the organization.”

Greg Shatan, a U.S. lawyer who is a member of an ICANN working group, said the change is “a big deal” but that Washington is not walking away entirely from its role in the Internet. The change affects “the plumbing of the Internet,” but ICANN still has obligations to the U.S. under its “Affirmation of Commitments,” Shatan added in an email. “By making this announcement, the U.S. is trying to make sure the transition happens on its own terms, and that the U.S. is setting the rules for the transition.”

The European Union recently called for these modifications, but some other countries have been seeking deeper changes, such as placing the Internet under U.N. control — which came up at a heated 2012 gathering of the U.N.’s International Telecommunications Union.

“The U.S. is making sure that the ITU and the U.N. do not take this oversight function,” Shatan said. “The press release is very clear that the U.S. will not accept any proposal that replaces U.S. government oversight with a government or intergovernmental solution.”