Thai opposition petitions court to annul election

AP

Thailand’s main opposition party petitioned a court Tuesday to annul last weekend’s national election, launching a legal challenge that could prolong the deeply divided country’s political paralysis.

The Democrat Party’s petition to the Constitutional Court also urges the dissolution of Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra’s ruling party, which called Sunday’s elections in a bid to defuse anti-government protests that started three months ago.

Wiratana Kalayasiri, a former opposition lawmaker and head of the Democrat Party’s legal team, said the petition argues the polls violated the constitution on several grounds, including that they were not completed in one day.

Critics call the Democrats’ argument counterintuitive, saying the reason the election could not be finished in one day is because anti-government protesters backed by the party sabotaged the vote.

The Democrat Party boycotted the election, and the protesters aligned with it forced the closure of hundreds of polling stations in Bangkok and the south, preventing millions of people from voting.

As a result, a series of special elections are required to complete the balloting. Election results cannot be announced until all areas have successfully voted.

“This election has violated the constitution on several counts, but mainly it was not a fair one,” Wiratana said. “The election was not held on the same day . . . that is why we are seeking to nullify it.”

Despite fears of violence, the voting proceeded peacefully in 90 percent of polling stations.

The struggle to hold the balloting was part of a 3-month-old conflict that has split the country between supporters of Yingluck and opponents, who allege her government is too corrupt to rule, and that she is a puppet of her brother, ousted Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra.

Thaksin, a billionaire businessman who is the most divisive figure in modern Thai history, fled into exile to avoid a corruption conviction after being deposed in a 2006 military coup.

The demonstrators have occupied major intersections in Bangkok and forced government ministries to shut down and work elsewhere.

The protesters are demanding the elected government be replaced by an unelected “people’s council” to enact reforms ahead of new elections and remove the Shinawatra family’s influence from politics.

Yingluck has refused to step down, arguing she was elected by a large majority and is open to reform, but that such a council would be unconstitutional and undemocratic.

  • http://www.sheldonthinks.com/ Andrew Sheldon

    It is with dismay that I have to acknowledge that, despite legitimacy in the Democrat Party’s efforts to depose the current leader, both because of the nature of the regime and the extortive nature of representative democracy, it is clear that these protagonists simply don’t have the intellect to defend their position. Their actions are morally defensible; the problem is that, had they used a ‘moral argument’, they would surely have alienated a great number of unthinking people currently supporting them. It seemed to work for the Founding Fathers of the USA. I guess Thailand is not ready to take that step. They have successfully spurned the personal renunciation typically associated with Christianity and most religions; it appears they stumbled on the embedded mysticism in the nation. Apparently those US-educated ‘elites’ are not ‘elite’ enough….or maybe modern America was the source of their confusion. Parodoxes abound. Maybe we’ll need to wait another 100 years. Way past my bedtime.