China successfully tests first stealth combat drone: media

AFP-JIJI

China has tested its first stealth combat drone, state media said Friday, citing online photos of an aircraft resembling a small U.S. B-2 bomber and hailing the advance toward Western-level technology.

The test flight came weeks after Tokyo said a drone had flown near the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea, causing tensions to escalate by another notch.

The drone in Friday’s announcement, called the “Sharp Sword,” is another step in China’s years-long military buildup, with its defense spending now the second-highest in the world and growing by double-digit percentages each year.

“The successful flight shows the nation has again narrowed the air-power disparity between itself and Western nations,” the state-run China Daily said.

It said Thursday’s test flight made China the “fourth power . . . capable of putting a stealth drone into the sky,” after the U.S., European Union and Britain.

Images posted online showed a sleek grey delta-wing aircraft apparently powered by a jet engine and resembling an American combat drone.

State media widely reported the new aircraft in close detail, although they said the test flight was first revealed by ordinary Internet users on a popular military Web forum, cjdby.net.

Chinese authorities quickly censor any news or images exposed online by citizens that they deem sensitive, so it is unlikely they did not approve the reports.

State broadcaster CCTV, citing eyewitnesses, said on its international channel that the test flight lasted 20 minutes Thursday afternoon in the southwestern city of Chengdu. The flight “implies that China has made the leap from drones to combat drones,” it said, calling it a move of “major significance.”

The aircraft was developed by two subsidiaries of Aviation Industry Corp. of China, the country’s top aircraft manufacturer, the China Daily said.

China is steadily building its military muscle and unveiled its first stealth fighter, the J-20, in early 2011, though it is not expected to enter service until 2018.

Beijing’s first aircraft carrier — a refurbished vessel purchased from Ukraine and named the Liaoning — went into service in September 2012 but is not expected to be fully operational for several years.

A drone was at the center of a recent spat between Beijing and Tokyo, whose dispute over the Senkaku Islands has raised concerns of conflict.

An unidentified unmanned aircraft flew near the islands in September, where China routinely conducts maritime patrols, prompting Japan to scramble fighter jets. The aircraft came from the northwest and returned in that direction, a defense official said.

Tokyo later threatened to shoot down any such aircraft, a move that Beijing warned would amount to an “act of war.”

  • Far East

    So much for the so-called ‘peaceful rise of China’

  • rr02

    You can call them “offensive” if you want but they have been classified as defensive in nature since they are designed for anti submarine warfare helicopters. Your own statement about offensive vs defensive is reckless and true only as you feel it to be.
    The determination of “defensive” has evolved with the need to have aerial tankers to assist interceptors in quickly reaching and returning from all corners of the Japanese Defensive Zones. With seaborne fuelers to assist other navies in the extraterritorial areas such as fueling partner country ships engaged in the Philippine relief operations.
    You can look for the demons in the shadows or you can see the Chinese actions for what they are; an emerging nuclear power setting about to achieve “peace” by intimidating it’s neighbors

  • rr02

    Okay, how would this work; two small Japanese carriers with only helicopters aboard will blockade how many thousands of miles of Chinese coast? A nation with no nuclear weapons will somehow, in an act of offensive antagonism deter a long time nuclear armed nation?

    • Testerty

      Go read the US and Japan proclaimed 1st Island Chain Defense about how they intend to blockade China.

  • rr02

    Maybe I misunderstand your use of the word “offensive”. Do you mean “offensive” like when you pick your nose and eat it or “offensive” as in a military operation? And when you speak of “doing that” do you mean using two puny ships to intimidate a nuclear nation with many times the population and more coastline than even Wash DC? The last thing I want to do is misunderstand your misunderstanding of the brilliance of this concept.

    • Testerty

      Both. Offensive as in disgusting and offensive as in aggressive. The so call “2 punny” ships you mentioned are backed by US$600 billion American military. It is like the pit bull and its gansta owner. walking into your backyard and the dog kept barking at you. LOL. Most offensive.

      • rr02

        I’m still having a hard time grasping the notion that two puny Japanese ships supported by a $600B “gansta” is going to blockade China by sea. With what? And why? What does the rest of the world have that China could possibly need so desperately that they haven’t done without before? The numerous blockades since WWII haven’t really worked so how on earth could anyone expect it to work this time?

      • Testerty

        You have to ask why do US imposed so many sanction on so many countries. Moreover, you have to ask why do US and Japan created the First Island Chain of Defense (a potential blockade actually) on China when, as you said, it is ineffective? SO why do people wave a gun at China when they claimed they are not going to use it?

      • rr02

        Why do I have to wonder about American sanctions of other countries when this topic is about China and Japan alone? My comment about previous blockades in general is meant to only illustrate the failure of such efforts.
        Politicians “wave a gun” all the time it just so happens China is doing it moreso now not only with China but the Philippines, The US has made great strides since the late ’60s to become more allied with China and continues to progress even with these minor territorial disputes that continue to crop up between China and it’s neighbors. It is the ineptness of the current US administration that allows these events to, lately escalate further than they should.

  • Ado Christian

    Don’t suppose they got the technology from any secure U.S. Government military website, or from a secure corporate website? Naaa, Communist China is not one to spy on the U.S. and steal any military secrets. and if you believe that… I got this neat bridge in Brooklyn that I can sell you for a price you can’t refuse… :-)