U.S. gas boom to fracture Asia energy scene: study


A boom in gas production will reshape the U.S. role in Asia and could fuel new tensions with a growing, energy-hungry China, a new report says.

U.S. foreign policy has historically been based largely on demand for outside energy, with Washington closely allying itself with oil-rich Arab monarchies. But a major increase in gas production — in part through the controversial practice of fracking deep underground — has given the United States the prospect not just of energy independence but of playing a Middle Eastern-style strategic role as an exporter, according to industry forecasts.

A report by the Seattle-based National Bureau of Asian Research predicted soaring demand from the continent — led by China — for imported gas. Despite rapid growth, Asia relies on natural gas for just 11 percent of its energy use, far lower than the 30 percent global average, the study said.

Four Western nations — the United States, Canada, Australia and Norway — could control 40 percent of the world’s natural gas supply by 2020, said Nikos Tsafos, an expert at consultancy PFC Energy who contributed to the report.

“If you’re sitting here in Washington . . . that could seem like a good thing. If you’re sitting in Beijing, you may not think so,” he said at the launch of the report in the U.S. capital.

Tsafos expected that Chinese suspicions of U.S. intentions would grow, pointing to the backlash in Beijing when American lawmakers’ concerns about national security led China to drop a bid to acquire former U.S. oil giant Unocal in 2005.

If its worries about the United States mount, China may increasingly look to neighboring Russia for energy or farther afield to countries such as Sudan, Venezuela or Iran, the report said.

Amy Myers Jaffe of the University of California, Davis said that China — traditionally focused on Taiwan and other regional interests — may calculate that it needs to develop its military to secure far-flung oil and gas installations.

“The United States will be able to use its energy abundance as a means to promote its global vision,” she wrote, noting that Washington may pursue a “more assertive” foreign policy. “But it must also consider how its changed energy situation will influence China’s military calculus.”

Mikkal Herberg of the University of California, San Diego, noted that the rise in U.S. energy security comes as the war-weary country cuts its military budget. Asian nations, however, still rely on oil and liquefied natural gas from the Middle East.

A reduction of the U.S. role in the region “would have important implications for Asia, since much of its imported oil and LNG comes from the Middle East and is secured by U.S. power in the region and protection of sea lanes from the Middle East to Asia,” he wrote. U.S. President Barack Obama has already declared a “pivot” strategy of putting a greater focus on Asia, which he has said is key to the U.S. future.

China has been seeking in the medium term to reduce its overwhelming dependence on coal, one of the dirtiest forms of energy and one that is linked to the country’s notoriously poor air quality as well as climate change. It has been pursuing renewable energy such as solar, but gas has grown more attractive as prices drop.

Japan, Asia’s second-largest economy, has also been on the prowl for foreign energy after the Fukushima disaster in 2011 led it to shut down nuclear reactors.

  • Why would US production levels, even if a quarter of the world’s total, be an issue for China, given that the US is only bolstering its production for ‘self-sufficiency. Strange logic. The opposite is actually true; there is more ‘seaborne’ capacity for China to buy. Also both China and the US can rely on Australia and plenty of others for alternate supply…as you allude to Russia as a natural supplier to China. China is also a large country, who can be expected to embrace solar as it becomes even more commercial.