/ |

As China targets graft, bribes abound in schools

The Washington Post

For years, Yang Jie’s friends warned her to save up for her daughter’s education. Not for tuition or textbooks, but for the bribes needed to get into the city’s better public schools.

A strong-willed, self-made businesswoman, Yang largely ignored their advice. “Success in life,” she told her daughter, “is achieved through hard work.”

But now, with her daughter entering the anxiety-filled application process for middle school, Yang is questioning that principle. She has watched her friends shower teachers and school administrators with favors, presents and money. One friend bought a new elevator for a top school. His child was admitted soon after.

Reining in corruption has been the main focus of China’s new president, Xi Jinping. But such campaigns are barely making a dent, critics say, in a country where children are shown as early as elementary school how to game the system.

Almost everything, from admission to grades to teacher recommendations, is negotiable in Chinese schools if you know the right person or have enough cash, parents and teachers say. As a result, many believe, the education system is worsening rather than mending the vast gap between the elite and everyone else in China.

As middle-class parents in Haidian, one of Beijing’s most competitive school districts, Yang, 42, and her husband had some money but few connections to help their daughter get into an elite school.

Then, this summer, a dance teacher pulled Yang aside. He said he knew people at the middle school her daughter had been aiming all her efforts at attending.

And suddenly, Yang admits, she started looking into how much savings she and her husband could cobble together if the dance teacher’s friends were to ask for compensation. She still hasn’t decided what to do.

Their dilemma, she said, boils down to this: “If everyone else is playing the game, how can I refuse?”

In Chinese cities, the best schools are the public ones.

Private schools are often aimed either at foreign expats or children barred from city schools, like the offspring of low-income Chinese migrant workers.

Even by Western standards, the top public schools are often astounding. During a recent tour of Beijing’s Jingshan School, administrators showed off a $326,000, one-story-high telescope for astronomy lessons, housed in a rotating room with retractable ceiling; flat-screen televisions in every class; pricey computer labs; an Olympic-size pool, and a state-of-the-art hydroponics garden. The school recently began requiring doctorate degrees for all upper-grade teachers.

Meanwhile, just a few kilometers away, at a private school for migrant families, kids walked off a dirt road into a ramshackle facility with cracked walls, overcrowded classes and a single bathroom consisting of cement holes in the ground.An intense competition has developed among parents to win admission for their offspring to the best schools.

Academic performance still matters greatly. And like many students, Yang’s 12-year-old daughter, Ma Qianyi, has spent every night over the past three years, even on weekends and vacations, attending expensive cram classes.

But she is the first to admit she doesn’t work hard, compared with her peers.

The hyper-competitiveness has driven many parents to curry favor in any way possible — delivering organic rice to a teacher worried about food safety, bringing back lavish gifts from abroad. When all else fails, store gift cards are always a safe bet.

“Sometimes, you open these cards on National Teacher’s Day and find crazy amounts inside,” one Beijing teacher said.

Such gifts, several parents explained, can lead to more attention for a struggling student, extra praise for gifted ones or even a seat closer to the front of the classroom.

“It’s human nature,” said one parent who regularly sends her son to school with gift cards. Like many adults interviewed, she asked for anonymity to talk frankly about school corruption. “If the teacher is choosing between two kids on equal footing, the effect of a gift may be small, but it could make all the difference.”

Yang used to send gift cards, too, worth $20 or $30 — modest in comparison to the $200 or $300 from other families. But she eventually stopped even that.

“It didn’t seem to make a difference,” she said. “I decided to save the money instead for things that actually contribute to my daughter’s education, like cram classes.”

The decision left her daughter uncomfortable and even bitter at times.

Her mother recalled the time in second grade when Qianyi lost out on a top award. “My daughter said to me, ‘The teacher chose that girl because her mother was smart and gave medicine to the teacher when she was sick.’ She asked me, ‘Why didn’t you give any medicine?’ “

The question has haunted Yang of late, with her daughter finishing elementary school in the spring.

Getting into a good middle school means a shot at Beijing’s top high schools. A top high school means proper preparation for China’s infamously rigorous college admissions exam, called the “gaokao.” A good gaokao score means a secure job, higher income, better housing, better marriage prospects.

Education in China is supposedly free and funded by the government. But elite schools benefit from hefty fees and donations. These days, admission to a decent Beijing middle school often requires payments and bribes of upwards of $16,000, according to many parents. Six-figure sums are not unheard of.

In theory, middle school admissions are guided by where children live, but independent studies have shown that only half the students at Beijing’s top public schools are chosen that way.

Instead, getting in often comes down to three things: talent, money and relationships, particularly ties with government or party officials.

“If you know someone, you pay a lot less,” said a mother in Beijing’s Chaoyang district.

Some payoffs have become semi-legal. Many government ministries and state-owned companies reserve seats for children of their employees through large donations to schools.

And most top schools charge a “school choice fee” — ranging from $5,000 to $40,000 — for children living outside of specific school districts. The central government has repeatedly banned such fees. But they have not only remained, they’ve risen in recent years. Lacking the resources of wealthier, better-connected families, Yang and her daughter decided early on to target seats reserved at most top schools for those with “speciality skills.” That’s why Qianyi took up dancing three years ago.

“It’s the only thing I’m good at,” she said matter-of-factly on a recent night, while wolfing down noodles before a lesson.

But schools’ evaluations of such skills have also proven susceptible to corruption.

A parent in Yang’s district who was approached for bribes by a coach explained it this way: “Just because your child wins first place in a race doesn’t mean he has the best chance. The school can choose the third- or even fourth-place runner and simply say they had more potential.”

Neither Yang nor her husband attended college; she did finish a vocational high school. Yet, she managed to start her own company with a friend, selling imported sensors.

Today’s China, however, is a different country from that of her youth, exponentially more competitive. Millions vie in megacities for limited jobs, housing and mates.

Yang said she has struggled to define guiding principles for herself even as she has tried to teach life lessons to her daughter.

“I want her to be able to see this society for what it is — one that is full of wolves,” Yang said. “But I don’t necessarily want her to be either wolf or sheep.”

  • 曾虎

    What a shame!!!

  • Ben

    it’s really quite interesting how rather than try to improve the system, parents instead focus their efforts on improving their own child’s individual chances. i wonder how much better off the country would be if the bribes paid to get into school were instead used to organise and protest the government into fixing the system?

    • lasolitaria

      Or maybe getting the government out of education?

      • Ben

        the government isn’t in education. the bribes were paid to teachers and school administrators. the article even says that government officials themselves have to pay bribes (in the form of donations) to get their kids in.

      • lasolitaria

        I think you missed the fact that the whole article revolves around public (i.e. funded and controlled by government) schools and how they’re sought for.

      • Ben

        they’re public schools yes, but i think you’ve just assumed that means public officials choose who gets in, which is not how the article reads.

        She has watched her friends shower teachers and school administrators with favors, presents and money. One friend bought a new elevator for a top school. His child was admitted soon after.

        “Sometimes, you open these cards on National Teacher’s Day and find crazy amounts inside,” one Beijing teacher said.

        “If the teacher is choosing between two kids on equal footing, the effect of a gift may be small, but it could make all the difference.”

        As you can see, the bribes go to teachers and school administrators, not the government.

      • lasolitaria

        Well, public officials do choose who gets in because the administrators of public schools are public officials.

        The fact that bribes go to the officials receiving them rather than the government goes without saying. If a bribe goes to the government rather than to the individuals directly involved, is that really a bribe?

        The issue here is that public schools that should in theory be open for everybody not only aren’t but actually end up being more excluding than private schools. That’s a problem only for public schools.

        I doubt there will be no more bribes and/or schools will become less excluding if government gets out of education but at least public funds won’t be used to pay for fancy learning environments for the children of the privileged.

        I’m not excluding your solution (I thought my “or maybe” made that sufficiently clear) but just posing another. I do think, though, that it’s naive to believe popular protests (assuming they’re peaceful) can push a corrupt government into “fixing the system” at least one time, let alone in the long term. Besides, why is it indispensable that the government be involved in “fixing the system”?

      • lasolitaria

        The fact that bribes go to the officials directly involved rather than to government goes without saying (a bribe that went to government wouldn’t be a bribe, maybe a donation). However, my issue isn’t who is bribed. My issue is that public schools that are funded by the people so they are in theory open for everybody not only aren’t but actually end up being fancy playgrounds for the children of the privileged. If government steps out, the best schools will still be fancy and get bribes but the whole thing won’t cost the people a dime.

        I don’t exclude your solution but I pose another (that’s why I said “or maybe”). I do believe, though, that thinking popular protests (assuming they’re peaceful) can push a corrupt government into fixing itself once, let alone in the long term, is naive. So getting it out of schools may be as hard or even harder to achieve but it has a more realistic chance at solving the issue.

        P.S.: public officials DO choose who gets in because the administrators of public schools are public officials.