Japan, China and South Korea designate Yokohama as East Asia City of Culture

Kyodo

The culture ministers of Japan, China and South Korea met Saturday in the ancient South Korean city of Gwangju and designated one East Asia City of Culture in each country.

Culture minister Hakubun Shimomura nominated Yokohama, a historic port city known for international exchanges, while China’s envoy chose Quanzhou, an ancient trading port in southern Fujian province, and South Korea’s representative selected Gwangju, for its more than 2,000-year history.

The three cities will serve as the principal venues for a series of cultural and arts exchange programs to be organized next year to promote mutual understanding among the three neighbors, whose ties have been harmed by increasingly rancorous territorial clashes and conflicting historical interpretations.

Shimomura’s trilateral get-together with Chinese Minister of Culture Cai Wu and South Korean Culture Minister Yoo Jin-ryong was the first Cabinet-level meeting among the three countries since Prime Minister Shinzo Abe took office last December.

Tokyo’s relations with Beijing and Seoul have been badly strained over the past year by the Senkaku and Takeshima territorial disputes, as well as differing historical views of Japan’s invasion of China and colonial rule of the Korean Peninsula in the last century.

“One big achievement of this meeting is that we have come to share the understanding that cultural exchanges are important to develop the ties of our countries,” Shimomura told reporters after the one-day summit.

The three also agreed to hold the next trilateral meeting of cultural ministers next year in Japan. As host nation, Japan will additionally put on an arts and culture festival featuring events and performances from the three countries.

The three sides will designate new East Asia Cities of Culture from 2015.

Japan, China and South Korea launched the trilateral minister-level culture summits in 2007. The Gwangju meeting was the fifth held. The three neighbors also held a ministerial conference on environmental issues in May, but, reflecting its soured diplomatic ties with Japan, China only dispatched a deputy minister.

  • Ron NJ

    Being founded in 57 BC, I take issue with the claim that Gwangju is “ancient”. The only thing it could possibly be ancient compared to are cities like Kyoto (relatively recent with a foundation in 794 AD) and cities in modern colonial states (ie America, Australia, etc in cases where habitation did not overlap with natives).
    Why even bother using a word like that? It’s just ridiculous orientalism like “ooh, mysterious Asia look how ancient and different it is!” when in reality Gwangju is just a relatively young city which, let’s be fair, doesn’t even retain all that much from the past given how extensively it has been built up and the past wiped out. Not a thing ancient about it no matter how you cut it.